• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学校健康促进评估:混合方法的真实评价方法。

Evaluation of health promotion in schools: a realistic evaluation approach using mixed methods.

机构信息

EHESP School of Public Health (Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Santé Publique), 35043 Rennes CEDEX, France.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2010 Jan 28;10:43. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-43.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-10-43
PMID:20109202
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2824736/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Schools are key settings for health promotion (HP) but the development of suitable approaches for evaluating HP in schools is still a major topic of discussion. This article presents a research protocol of a program developed to evaluate HP. After reviewing HP evaluation issues, the various possible approaches are analyzed and the importance of a realistic evaluation framework and a mixed methods (MM) design are demonstrated.

METHODS/DESIGN: The design is based on a systemic approach to evaluation, taking into account the mechanisms, context and outcomes, as defined in realistic evaluation, adjusted to our own French context using an MM approach. The characteristics of the design are illustrated through the evaluation of a nationwide HP program in French primary schools designed to enhance children's social, emotional and physical health by improving teachers' HP practices and promoting a healthy school environment. An embedded MM design is used in which a qualitative data set plays a supportive, secondary role in a study based primarily on a different quantitative data set. The way the qualitative and quantitative approaches are combined through the entire evaluation framework is detailed.

DISCUSSION

This study is a contribution towards the development of suitable approaches for evaluating HP programs in schools. The systemic approach of the evaluation carried out in this research is appropriate since it takes account of the limitations of traditional evaluation approaches and considers suggestions made by the HP research community.

摘要

背景

学校是促进健康(HP)的重要场所,但开发适合学校 HP 评估的方法仍然是一个主要的讨论话题。本文介绍了一项旨在评估 HP 的方案的研究方案。在回顾 HP 评估问题后,分析了各种可能的方法,并论证了现实评估框架和混合方法(MM)设计的重要性。

方法/设计:该设计基于系统评估方法,考虑了现实评估中定义的机制、背景和结果,根据我们自己的法国国情,使用 MM 方法进行调整。通过评估法国小学全国性的 HP 计划,说明了设计的特点,该计划旨在通过提高教师的 HP 实践和促进健康的学校环境来增强儿童的社会、情感和身体健康。采用嵌入式 MM 设计,其中定性数据集在主要基于不同定量数据集的研究中发挥辅助、次要作用。详细说明了通过整个评估框架结合定性和定量方法的方式。

讨论

本研究为开发适合学校 HP 计划的评估方法做出了贡献。本研究中进行的评估的系统方法是合适的,因为它考虑到了传统评估方法的局限性,并考虑了 HP 研究界的建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c87/2824736/b5c2cc32770d/1471-2458-10-43-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c87/2824736/b52a08e2ad96/1471-2458-10-43-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c87/2824736/5c975bd3ce85/1471-2458-10-43-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c87/2824736/c0bfabc34992/1471-2458-10-43-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c87/2824736/41dea8851f94/1471-2458-10-43-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c87/2824736/b5c2cc32770d/1471-2458-10-43-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c87/2824736/b52a08e2ad96/1471-2458-10-43-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c87/2824736/5c975bd3ce85/1471-2458-10-43-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c87/2824736/c0bfabc34992/1471-2458-10-43-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c87/2824736/41dea8851f94/1471-2458-10-43-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c87/2824736/b5c2cc32770d/1471-2458-10-43-5.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of health promotion in schools: a realistic evaluation approach using mixed methods.学校健康促进评估:混合方法的真实评价方法。
BMC Public Health. 2010 Jan 28;10:43. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-43.
2
Significant effects of implementation of health-promoting schools on schoolteachers' nutrition knowledge and dietary intake in Taiwan.实施健康促进学校对台湾地区学校教师营养知识和饮食摄入的显著影响。
Public Health Nutr. 2010 Apr;13(4):579-88. doi: 10.1017/S1368980009991017. Epub 2009 Aug 6.
3
A quasi-experimental cross-disciplinary evaluation of the impacts of education outside the classroom on pupils' physical activity, well-being and learning: the TEACHOUT study protocol.一项关于课外教育对学生身体活动、幸福感和学习影响的准实验性跨学科评估:TEACHOUT研究方案
BMC Public Health. 2016 Oct 24;16(1):1117. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3780-8.
4
A health promotion initiative in French primary schools based on teacher training and support: actionable evidence in context.基于教师培训和支持的法国小学健康促进计划:背景下的可行证据。
Glob Health Promot. 2011 Mar;18(1):34-8. doi: 10.1177/1757975910393585.
5
Evaluating OzHarvest's primary-school Food Education and Sustainability Training (FEAST) program in 10-12-year-old children in Australia: protocol for a pragmatic cluster non-randomized controlled trial.评估澳大利亚 10-12 岁儿童的 OzHarvest 小学食品教育和可持续性培训(FEAST)计划:一项实用的群组非随机对照试验方案。
BMC Public Health. 2021 May 22;21(1):967. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10302-0.
6
The Healthy Primary School of the Future: study protocol of a quasi-experimental study.未来健康小学:一项准实验研究的研究方案
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jul 26;16:639. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3301-9.
7
A primary school active break programme (ACTI-BREAK): study protocol for a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial.一项小学主动休息计划(ACTI-BREAK):一项试点整群随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2017 Sep 19;18(1):433. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2163-5.
8
Study protocol of the quasi-experimental evaluation of "KEIGAAF": a context-based physical activity and nutrition intervention for primary school children.“KEIGAAF”的准实验评估研究方案:一项针对小学生的基于情境的体力活动和营养干预。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jul 6;18(1):842. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5764-3.
9
School-based intervention that integrates nutrition education and supportive healthy school food environment among Malaysian primary school children: a study protocol.马来西亚小学生营养教育与支持健康学校食物环境相结合的学校干预措施:研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Oct 30;19(1):1427. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7708-y.
10
Scaling-up an efficacious school-based physical activity intervention: Study protocol for the 'Internet-based Professional Learning to help teachers support Activity in Youth' (iPLAY) cluster randomized controlled trial and scale-up implementation evaluation.扩大一项有效的校内体育活动干预措施:“基于互联网的专业学习以帮助教师支持青少年活动”(iPLAY)整群随机对照试验及扩大实施评估的研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Aug 24;16(1):873. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3243-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Healthy Me, Healthy Planet: Evaluation of a pilot planetary health library program.健康的我,健康的星球:一项行星健康图书馆试点项目的评估
Health Promot J Austr. 2025 Jan;36(1):e882. doi: 10.1002/hpja.882. Epub 2024 Jun 9.
2
Daily Optional Physical Education Does Not Counteract Increasing Inactivity by Age among Adolescents.每日可选体育课并不能抵消青少年随着年龄增长而日益增加的身体活动不足。
Children (Basel). 2023 Dec 14;10(12):1929. doi: 10.3390/children10121929.
3
The "Planning Health in School" Programme (PHS-pro) to Improve Healthy Eating and Physical Activity: Design, Methodology, and Process Evaluation.

本文引用的文献

1
Creating the document 'Promoting health in schools: from evidence to action'.创建文档“促进学校健康:从证据到行动”。
Glob Health Promot. 2009 Dec;16(4):69-71. doi: 10.1177/1757975909348138.
2
Practices and representations of health education among primary school teachers.小学教师的健康教育实践和表现。
Scand J Public Health. 2010 Feb;38(1):86-94. doi: 10.1177/1403494809350518. Epub 2009 Oct 22.
3
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.
《学校卫生规划》(PHS-pro)项目改善健康饮食和身体活动:设计、方法和过程评估。
Nutrients. 2023 Oct 26;15(21):4543. doi: 10.3390/nu15214543.
4
Evaluation of the Health Promoting Schools (CEPS) Program in the Balearic Islands, Spain.西班牙巴利阿里群岛健康促进学校(CEPS)计划评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 29;19(17):10756. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710756.
5
[Realistic evaluation mechanisms in primary health care interventions in rural and marginal urban populationsMecanismos de avaliação realistas em intervenções de atenção primária à saúde em populações rurais e urbanas periféricas].农村及城市边缘人群初级卫生保健干预中的现实评估机制
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2022 Apr 12;46:e27. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2022.27. eCollection 2022.
6
Factors influencing the effectiveness of a Cooperative Planning approach in the school setting.影响合作规划方法在学校环境中有效性的因素。
Health Promot Int. 2021 Dec 13;36(Supplement_2):ii16-ii25. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daab164.
7
Supporting parents by combatting social inequalities in health: a realist evaluation.通过消除健康方面的社会不平等来支持父母:一项现实主义评估
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jun 29;21(1):1252. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11237-2.
8
Implementing large-system, value-based healthcare initiatives: a realist study protocol for seven natural experiments.实施大型系统、基于价值的医疗保健倡议:一项针对七个自然实验的现实主义研究方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 22;10(12):e044049. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044049.
9
School health and nutrition program implementation, impact, and challenges in schools of Nepal: stakeholders' perceptions.尼泊尔学校的学校健康与营养计划实施情况、影响及挑战:利益相关者的看法
Trop Med Health. 2019 May 14;47:32. doi: 10.1186/s41182-019-0159-4. eCollection 2019.
10
Implementation of health promotion programmes in schools: an approach to understand the influence of contextual factors on the process?在学校实施健康促进计划:一种理解情境因素对过程影响的方法?
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jan 22;18(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-5011-3.
《流行病学观察性研究报告强化(STROBE)声明》:观察性研究报告指南
Bull World Health Organ. 2007 Nov;85(11):867-72. doi: 10.2471/blt.07.045120.
4
Did the Ottawa Charter play a role in the push to assess the effectiveness of health promotion?《渥太华宪章》在推动评估健康促进的有效性方面发挥了作用吗?
Promot Educ. 2007;Suppl 2:28-30. doi: 10.1177/10253823070140020901x.
5
In defense of the randomized controlled trial for health promotion research.为健康促进研究中的随机对照试验辩护。
Am J Public Health. 2006 Jul;96(7):1181-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.061713. Epub 2006 May 30.
6
Toward European consensus tools for reviewing the evidence and enhancing the quality of health promotion practice.迈向用于审查证据和提高健康促进实践质量的欧洲共识工具。
Promot Educ. 2005;Suppl 1:10-4, 45-6, 55-6 passim. doi: 10.1177/10253823050120010105x.
7
[Towards a framework to assess the effectiveness of community-based health promotion initiatives: recent North-American developments].[构建评估社区健康促进倡议成效的框架:北美地区近期的进展]
Promot Educ. 2004;Spec no 1:17-21, 49.
8
[School health education: practices and representations of primary school teachers].[学校健康教育:小学教师的实践与表现]
Sante Publique. 2002 Dec;14(4):403-23.
9
Reconsidering community-based health promotion: promise, performance, and potential.重新审视基于社区的健康促进:前景、成效与潜力。
Am J Public Health. 2003 Apr;93(4):557-74. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.4.557.
10
The Faces Pain Scale for the self-assessment of the severity of pain experienced by children: development, initial validation, and preliminary investigation for ratio scale properties.用于儿童自我评估所经历疼痛严重程度的面部疼痛量表:开发、初步验证及比率量表属性的初步调查。
Pain. 1990 May;41(2):139-150. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(90)90018-9.