Suppr超能文献

撒哈拉以南非洲地区的卫生筹资政策:政府主导还是受捐助方影响?对决策过程的范围界定审查

Health financing policies in Sub-Saharan Africa: government ownership or donors' influence? A scoping review of policymaking processes.

作者信息

Gautier Lara, Ridde Valéry

机构信息

Department of social and preventive medicine, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec Canada.

Public Health Research Institute (IRSPUM), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec Canada.

出版信息

Glob Health Res Policy. 2017 Aug 8;2:23. doi: 10.1186/s41256-017-0043-x. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The rise on the international scene of advocacy for universal health coverage (UHC) was accompanied by the promotion of a variety of health financing policies. Major donors presented health insurance, user fee exemption, and results-based financing policies as relevant instruments for achieving UHC in Sub-Saharan Africa. The "donor-driven" push for policies aiming at UHC raises concerns about governments' effective buy-in of such policies. Because the latter has implications on the success of such policies, we searched for evidence of government ownership of the policymaking process.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review of the English and French literature from January 2001 to December 2015 on government ownership of decision-making on policies aiming at UHC in Sub-Saharan Africa. Thirty-five (35) results were retrieved. We extracted, synthesized and analyzed data in order to provide insights on ownership at five stages of the policymaking process: emergence, formulation, funding, implementation, and evaluation.

RESULTS

The majority of articles (24/35) showed mixed results (i.e. ownership was identified at one or more levels of policymaking process but not all) in terms of government ownership. Authors of only five papers provided evidence of ownership at all reviewed policymaking stages. When results demonstrated some lack of government ownership at any of the five stages, we noticed that donors did not necessarily play a role: other actors' involvement was contributing to undermining government-owned decision-making, such as the private sector. We also found evidence that both government ownership and donors' influence can successfully coexist.

DISCUSSION

Future research should look beyond indicators of government ownership, by analyzing historical factors behind the imbalance of power between the different actors during policy negotiations. There is a need to investigate how some national actors become policy champions and thereby influence policy formulation. In order to effectively achieve government ownership of financing policies aiming at UHC, we recommend strengthening the State's coordination and domestic funding mobilization roles, together with securing a higher involvement of governmental (both political and technical) actors by donors.

摘要

背景

倡导全民健康覆盖(UHC)在国际舞台上兴起的同时,也推动了各种卫生筹资政策的发展。主要捐助方将医疗保险、免除用户费用和基于结果的筹资政策作为撒哈拉以南非洲实现全民健康覆盖的相关工具。“捐助方驱动”推动旨在实现全民健康覆盖的政策引发了对政府是否切实认可此类政策的担忧。由于这对这些政策的成功实施具有影响,我们探寻了政府在决策过程中主导地位的证据。

方法

我们对2001年1月至2015年12月期间关于撒哈拉以南非洲旨在实现全民健康覆盖的政策决策中政府主导地位的英文和法文文献进行了范围界定审查。共检索到35项研究结果。我们提取、综合并分析了数据,以便深入了解决策过程五个阶段(出现、制定、筹资、实施和评估)的主导情况。

结果

大多数文章(24/35)在政府主导方面呈现出混合结果(即在决策过程的一个或多个层面存在主导情况,但并非全部层面)。只有五篇论文的作者提供了在所有审查的决策阶段都存在主导的证据。当结果表明在五个阶段中的任何一个阶段存在政府主导不足时,我们注意到捐助方不一定发挥了作用:其他行为体的参与导致政府主导的决策受到破坏,例如私营部门。我们还发现证据表明政府主导和捐助方的影响可以成功共存。

讨论

未来的研究应超越政府主导的指标,通过分析政策谈判期间不同行为体之间权力不平衡背后的历史因素。有必要调查一些国家行为体如何成为政策倡导者并进而影响政策制定。为了有效实现政府对旨在实现全民健康覆盖的筹资政策的主导,我们建议加强国家的协调和国内资金筹集作用,同时确保捐助方让政府(政治和技术)行为体更多地参与进来。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7712/5683243/fa2ddfafb883/41256_2017_43_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验