• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Guidance for publishing qualitative research in informatics.信息学中定性研究发表指南。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Nov 25;28(12):2743-2748. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab195.
2
Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis.系列:定性研究实用指南。第 3 部分:抽样、数据收集和分析。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2018 Dec;24(1):9-18. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1375091. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
3
Reporting qualitative research in health informatics: REQ-HI recommendations.健康信息学中定性研究的报告:REQ-HI建议
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;169:877-81.
4
Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing.系列:定性研究实用指南。第 4 部分:可信性和出版。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2018 Dec;24(1):120-124. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
5
Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 2: Context, research questions and designs.系列:定性研究实用指南。第 2 部分:背景、研究问题与设计。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2017 Dec;23(1):274-279. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1375090.
6
STARE-HI--Statement on reporting of evaluation studies in Health Informatics.STARE-HI——关于健康信息学中评估研究报告的声明。
Int J Med Inform. 2009 Jan;78(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.09.002. Epub 2008 Oct 18.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
The methodological integrity of critical qualitative research: Principles to support design and research review.关键定性研究的方法完整性:支持设计和研究审查的原则。
J Couns Psychol. 2021 Apr;68(3):357-370. doi: 10.1037/cou0000523.
9
Systematic prioritization of the STARE-HI reporting items. An application to short conference papers on health informatics evaluation.STARE-HI报告项目的系统优先级排序。在健康信息学评估短会议论文中的应用。
Methods Inf Med. 2012;51(2):104-11. doi: 10.3414/ME10-01-0072. Epub 2011 Mar 4.
10
STARE-HI -statement on reporting of evaluation studies in health informatics.STARE-HI——关于健康信息学评估研究报告的声明
Yearb Med Inform. 2009:23-31.

引用本文的文献

1
The public's perceptions and attitudes of male nursing postgraduate professional identity on Chinese social media: Qualitative study based on machine learning.中国社交媒体上公众对男性护理研究生职业认同的认知与态度:基于机器学习的定性研究
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 4;20(9):e0331379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331379. eCollection 2025.
2
Migration and health literacy: a qualitative analysis of health literacy among Africans from refugee backgrounds in Australia.移民与健康素养:对澳大利亚具有难民背景的非洲人的健康素养的定性分析
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 11;25(1):2432. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23658-4.
3
"Be Really Careful about That": Clinicians' Perceptions of an Intelligence Augmentation Tool for In-Hospital Deterioration Detection.“对此务必格外小心”:临床医生对一种用于院内病情恶化检测的智能增强工具的看法。
Appl Clin Inform. 2025 Mar;16(2):377-392. doi: 10.1055/a-2505-7743. Epub 2025 Apr 30.
4
Finding Consensus on Trust in AI in Health Care: Recommendations From a Panel of International Experts.在医疗保健领域对人工智能信任达成共识:国际专家小组的建议。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 19;27:e56306. doi: 10.2196/56306.
5
The Significance of Information Quality for the Secondary Use of the Information in the National Health Care Quality Registers in Finland.信息质量对芬兰国家医疗保健质量登记册中信息二次使用的重要性。
Methods Inf Med. 2024 Sep;63(3-04):66-76. doi: 10.1055/a-2511-7866. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
6
Exploring Participants' Experiences of Digital Health Interventions With Qualitative Methods: Guidance for Researchers.用定性方法探索参与者对数字健康干预的体验:研究人员指南。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 28;26:e62761. doi: 10.2196/62761.
7
Machine learning-based prediction models in medical decision-making in kidney disease: patient, caregiver, and clinician perspectives on trust and appropriate use.基于机器学习的预测模型在肾脏疾病医疗决策中的应用:患者、护理人员及临床医生对信任及合理使用的看法
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 Jan 1;32(1):51-62. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae255.
8
"Goldmine" or "big mess"? An interview study on the challenges of designing, operating, and ensuring the durability of Clinical Data Warehouses in France and Belgium.“金矿”还是“一团糟”?对法国和比利时设计、运营和确保临床数据仓库耐用性所面临挑战的访谈研究。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Nov 1;31(11):2699-2707. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae244.
9
ChatGPT Use Among Pediatric Health Care Providers: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.儿科保健提供者中使用 ChatGPT:横断面调查研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Sep 12;8:e56797. doi: 10.2196/56797.
10
Clinician voices on ethics of LLM integration in healthcare: a thematic analysis of ethical concerns and implications.临床医生对医疗保健中 LLM 整合的伦理看法:对伦理问题和影响的主题分析。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Sep 9;24(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02656-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Feeling better on hemodialysis: user-centered design requirements for promoting patient involvement in the prevention of treatment complications.血液透析中的舒适感:以用户为中心的设计要求,以促进患者参与预防治疗并发症。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Jul 30;28(8):1612-1631. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab033.
2
The Age Limit Does Not Exist: A Pilot Usability Assessment of a SMS-Messaging and Smartwatch-Based Intervention for Older Adults with Depression.年龄限制并不存在:基于短信和智能手表的干预措施对老年抑郁症患者的初步可用性评估。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2021 Jan 25;2020:213-222. eCollection 2020.
3
A scoping review of qualitative research in JAMIA: past contributions and opportunities for future work.JAMIA 中定性研究的范围综述:过去的贡献和未来工作的机会。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Feb 15;28(2):402-413. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa179.
4
Infrastructure Revisited: An Ethnographic Case Study of how Health Information Infrastructure Shapes and Constrains Technological Innovation.重新审视基础设施:关于健康信息基础设施如何塑造和制约技术创新的人种志案例研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Dec 19;21(12):e16093. doi: 10.2196/16093.
5
Design and Evaluation of an Integrated, Patient-Focused Electronic Health Record Display for Emergency Medicine.设计和评估一种综合的、以患者为中心的急诊电子病历显示系统。
Appl Clin Inform. 2019 Aug;10(4):693-706. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1695800. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
6
Informing, Reassuring, or Alarming? Balancing Patient Needs in the Development of a Postsurgical Symptom Reporting System in Cancer.提供信息、安抚还是警示?在癌症术后症状报告系统开发中平衡患者需求
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Dec 5;2018:166-174. eCollection 2018.
7
What Influences Saturation? Estimating Sample Sizes in Focus Group Research.哪些因素会影响饱和度?焦点小组研究中的样本量估计。
Qual Health Res. 2019 Aug;29(10):1483-1496. doi: 10.1177/1049732318821692. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
8
Process and Outcomes of a Recursive, Dialogic Member Checking Approach: A Project Ethnography.递归、对话式成员核查方法的过程和结果:一个项目民族志。
Qual Health Res. 2019 Jun;29(7):944-957. doi: 10.1177/1049732318812448. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
9
Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization.定性研究中的饱和度:探索其概念化与操作化
Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1893-1907. doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
10
Comparative Analysis of Recruitment Strategies in a Study of Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM) in Metropolitan Detroit.在底特律大都市男男性行为者(MSM)研究中比较招募策略。
AIDS Behav. 2018 Jul;22(7):2296-2311. doi: 10.1007/s10461-018-2071-z.

信息学中定性研究发表指南。

Guidance for publishing qualitative research in informatics.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Nov 25;28(12):2743-2748. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab195.

DOI:10.1093/jamia/ocab195
PMID:34537840
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8633663/
Abstract

Qualitative research, the analysis of nonquantitative and nonquantifiable data through methods such as interviews and observation, is integral to the field of biomedical and health informatics. To demonstrate the integrity and quality of their qualitative research, authors should report important elements of their work. This perspective article offers guidance about reporting components of the research, including theory, the research question, sampling, data collection methods, data analysis, results, and discussion. Addressing these points in the paper assists peer reviewers and readers in assessing the rigor of the work and its contribution to the literature. Clearer and more detailed reporting will ensure that qualitative research will continue to be published in informatics, helping researchers disseminate their understanding of people, organizations, context, and sociotechnical relationships as they relate to biomedical and health data.

摘要

定性研究通过访谈和观察等方法对非定量和不可量化的数据进行分析,是生物医学和健康信息学领域不可或缺的一部分。为了展示其定性研究的完整性和质量,作者应报告其工作的重要内容。本文观点提供了有关报告研究组成部分的指南,包括理论、研究问题、抽样、数据收集方法、数据分析、结果和讨论。在论文中解决这些问题有助于同行评审员和读者评估工作的严谨性及其对文献的贡献。更清晰、更详细的报告将确保信息学继续发表定性研究,帮助研究人员传播他们对与生物医学和健康数据相关的人、组织、背景和社会技术关系的理解。