Suppr超能文献

替代组织的选择会影响新生儿表观基因组关联研究的结果。

Choice of surrogate tissue influences neonatal EWAS findings.

作者信息

Lin Xinyi, Teh Ai Ling, Chen Li, Lim Ives Yubin, Tan Pei Fang, MacIsaac Julia L, Morin Alexander M, Yap Fabian, Tan Kok Hian, Saw Seang Mei, Lee Yung Seng, Holbrook Joanna D, Godfrey Keith M, Meaney Michael J, Kobor Michael S, Chong Yap Seng, Gluckman Peter D, Karnani Neerja

机构信息

Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, A*STAR, Singapore, 117609, Singapore.

Duke NUS Medical School, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.

出版信息

BMC Med. 2017 Dec 5;15(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0970-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Epigenomes are tissue specific and thus the choice of surrogate tissue can play a critical role in interpreting neonatal epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) and in their extrapolation to target tissue. To develop a better understanding of the link between tissue specificity and neonatal EWAS, and the contributions of genotype and prenatal factors, we compared genome-wide DNA methylation of cord tissue and cord blood, two of the most accessible surrogate tissues at birth.

METHODS

In 295 neonates, DNA methylation was profiled using Infinium HumanMethylation450 beadchip arrays. Sites of inter-individual variability in DNA methylation were mapped and compared across the two surrogate tissues at birth, i.e., cord tissue and cord blood. To ascertain the similarity to target tissues, DNA methylation profiles of surrogate tissues were compared to 25 primary tissues/cell types mapped under the Epigenome Roadmap project. Tissue-specific influences of genotype on the variable CpGs were also analyzed. Finally, to interrogate the impact of the in utero environment, EWAS on 45 prenatal factors were performed and compared across the surrogate tissues.

RESULTS

Neonatal EWAS results were tissue specific. In comparison to cord blood, cord tissue showed higher inter-individual variability in the epigenome, with a lower proportion of CpGs influenced by genotype. Both neonatal tissues were good surrogates for target tissues of mesodermal origin. They also showed distinct phenotypic associations, with effect sizes of the overlapping CpGs being in the same order of magnitude.

CONCLUSIONS

The inter-relationship between genetics, prenatal factors and epigenetics is tissue specific, and requires careful consideration in designing and interpreting future neonatal EWAS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This birth cohort is a prospective observational study, designed to study the developmental origins of health and disease, and was retrospectively registered on 1 July 2010 under the identifier NCT01174875 .

摘要

背景

表观基因组具有组织特异性,因此替代组织的选择对于解释新生儿全基因组表观遗传关联研究(EWAS)以及将其外推至目标组织可能起着关键作用。为了更好地理解组织特异性与新生儿EWAS之间的联系,以及基因型和产前因素的作用,我们比较了脐带组织和脐带血的全基因组DNA甲基化情况,这是出生时最容易获取的两种替代组织。

方法

对295名新生儿使用Infinium HumanMethylation450芯片阵列进行DNA甲基化分析。绘制并比较了出生时两种替代组织(即脐带组织和脐带血)之间个体间DNA甲基化变异位点。为确定与目标组织的相似性,将替代组织的DNA甲基化图谱与在表观基因组路线图项目下绘制的25种主要组织/细胞类型进行比较。还分析了基因型对可变CpG位点的组织特异性影响。最后,为探究子宫内环境的影响,对45种产前因素进行了EWAS分析,并在替代组织之间进行比较。

结果

新生儿EWAS结果具有组织特异性。与脐带血相比,脐带组织在表观基因组中显示出更高的个体间变异性,受基因型影响的CpG比例较低。两种新生儿组织都是中胚层来源目标组织的良好替代物。它们还显示出不同的表型关联,重叠CpG位点的效应大小处于相同数量级。

结论

遗传、产前因素和表观遗传学之间的相互关系具有组织特异性,在设计和解释未来的新生儿EWAS时需要仔细考虑。

试验注册

该出生队列是一项前瞻性观察性研究,旨在研究健康与疾病的发育起源,并于2010年7月1日进行回顾性注册,标识符为NCT01174875。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3296/5715509/81493d46c9c8/12916_2017_970_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验