Rossini Zefferino, Milani Davide, Nicolosi Federico, Costa Francesco, Lasio Giovanni Battista, D'Angelo Vincenzo Antonio, Fornari Maurizio, Colombo Giovanni
Division of Neurosurgery, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy; Division of Neurosurgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Italy.
Division of Neurosurgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Italy.
World Neurosurg. 2018 Feb;110:373-385. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.11.153. Epub 2017 Dec 2.
The transnasal approach to lesions involving the craniovertebral junction represents a technical challenge because of limited inferior exposure. The endoscopic transseptal approach (EtsA) with posterior nasal spine (PNS) removal is described. This technique can create a wide exposure of the craniovertebral junction, thereby increasing the caudal exposure.
On patients undergoing anterior craniovertebral junction decompression, we calculated the degree of exposure on the sagittal plan through a paraseptal route, an EtsA without and with PNS removal. The horizontal exposure and working area with the latter approach were also evaluated.
Five patients underwent the transnasal procedure. The age of patients ranged from 34-71 years. All patients harbored basilar impression. The mean postoperative Nurick grade (1, 8) was improved versus the average preoperative grade (3). The average follow-up duration was 16 months. All patients underwent occipitocervical fixation. The mean vertical distances, from the clinoid recess to the inferior most limit with the paraseptal approach, EtsA without and with PNS removal were 38.52, 44.12, and 51.16 mm, respectively. The difference between our approach and a standard paraseptal route was statistically significant (P = 0.041; P< 0.05). The mean horizontal distances were 31.68 mm (mononostril entry) and 35.37 mm (binostril entry). The mean working area was 1795.53 mm.
Endoscopic endonasal approaches to the craniovertebral junction are increasing, but the downward extension on the anterior cervical spine represents a limit. Therefore, many surgeons prefer transoral or transcervical approaches. The EtsA with PNS removal allows for a more caudal exposure than the standard paraseptal approach, with reduced nasal trauma.
由于下方暴露受限,经鼻入路处理累及颅颈交界区的病变是一项技术挑战。本文描述了一种经鼻内镜经鼻中隔入路(EtsA)并切除后鼻棘(PNS)的方法。该技术能够广泛暴露颅颈交界区,从而增加尾侧暴露范围。
在接受前路颅颈交界区减压的患者中,我们通过经鼻中隔路径、不切除和切除PNS的EtsA,计算矢状面上的暴露程度。还评估了后一种入路的水平暴露范围和操作区域。
5例患者接受了经鼻手术。患者年龄在34至71岁之间。所有患者均有基底凹陷。术后平均Nurick分级(1, 8)较术前平均分级(3)有所改善。平均随访时间为16个月。所有患者均接受了枕颈固定。经鼻中隔入路、不切除和切除PNS的EtsA从鞍结节到最下界限的平均垂直距离分别为38.52、44.12和51.16 mm。我们的入路与标准经鼻中隔路径之间的差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.041;P<0.05)。平均水平距离分别为31.68 mm(单鼻孔入路)和35.37 mm(双鼻孔入路)。平均操作区域为1795.53 mm²。
经鼻内镜入路处理颅颈交界区的情况越来越多,但颈椎前路的向下延伸存在局限性。因此,许多外科医生更喜欢经口或经颈入路。切除PNS的EtsA比标准经鼻中隔入路能提供更多的尾侧暴露,同时减少鼻创伤。