• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术后电话随访安全有效:前瞻性研究——莫纳什门诊电话随访试验

Post-operative telephone review is safe and effective: prospective study - Monash outpatient review by phone trial.

作者信息

Ma Yi, Jones Gregory, Tay Yeng Kwang, Hunter Toni, Holden Dane, Rodgers-Wilson Stephen, Cashin Paul, Tan Pee Yau, Croagh Daniel

机构信息

Department of Upper GI and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Department of General Surgery, Dandenong Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

ANZ J Surg. 2018 May;88(5):434-439. doi: 10.1111/ans.14280. Epub 2017 Dec 5.

DOI:10.1111/ans.14280
PMID:29205807
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Studies have shown that post-operative telephone follow-up is satisfactory and effective. As high quality evidence is scant, we conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare it against outpatient clinic review for emergency laparoscopic appendicectomy or cholecystectomy.

METHOD

Patients who received emergency laparoscopic appendicectomy or cholecystectomy were eligible for this study. Once recruited, they were randomly allocated to either clinic review or telephone follow-up on discharge. Participants were reviewed at 2 weeks after operation and contacted again at 4 weeks after initial follow-up for satisfaction survey.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy-nine participants were recruited with one withdrawn consent and six excluded. Ninety-six underwent laparoscopic appendicectomy and 76 had laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ninety-six attended clinic review and 76 had telephone follow-up. The two groups were similar in baseline variables. Non-attendance rate was higher for clinic review cohort (24% vs 6.6%, P = 0.002). Participants who received telephone review reported higher satisfaction level (9.31 vs 8.85, P = 0.002), and most patients prefer telephone follow-up (73.1%, P < 0.0001). No difference was detected for missed complications (P = 0.354).

CONCLUSION

Telephone follow-up post laparoscopic appendicectomy or cholecystectomy is safe, satisfying and effective.

摘要

引言

研究表明,术后电话随访令人满意且有效。由于高质量证据匮乏,我们开展了一项随机对照试验,将其与急诊腹腔镜阑尾切除术或胆囊切除术后的门诊复查进行比较。

方法

接受急诊腹腔镜阑尾切除术或胆囊切除术的患者符合本研究条件。一旦入选,他们在出院时被随机分配至门诊复查组或电话随访组。在术后2周对参与者进行复查,并在首次随访后4周再次联系以进行满意度调查。

结果

共招募了179名参与者,其中1人撤回同意书,6人被排除。96例行腹腔镜阑尾切除术,76例行腹腔镜胆囊切除术。96人接受门诊复查,76人接受电话随访。两组的基线变量相似。门诊复查队列的未就诊率更高(24%对6.6%,P = 0.002)。接受电话复查者报告的满意度更高(9.31对8.85,P = 0.002),且大多数患者更喜欢电话随访(73.1%,P < 0.0001)。在漏诊并发症方面未发现差异(P = 0.354)。

结论

腹腔镜阑尾切除术或胆囊切除术后的电话随访安全、令人满意且有效。

相似文献

1
Post-operative telephone review is safe and effective: prospective study - Monash outpatient review by phone trial.术后电话随访安全有效:前瞻性研究——莫纳什门诊电话随访试验
ANZ J Surg. 2018 May;88(5):434-439. doi: 10.1111/ans.14280. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
2
Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: home visit versus telephone follow-up.门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术:家访与电话随访
Can J Surg. 2001 Feb;44(1):39-44.
3
Patient preference for time-saving telehealth postoperative visits after routine surgery in an urban setting.患者对于在城市环境中进行常规手术后节省时间的远程医疗术后访视的偏好。
Surgery. 2018 Apr;163(4):672-679. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.08.015. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
4
Single hospital visit elective day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy without prior outpatient attendance.单次住院择期日间腹腔镜胆囊切除术,无需事先门诊就诊。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Sep;31(9):3574-3580. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5387-7. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
5
Telehealth follow-up in lieu of postoperative clinic visit for ambulatory surgery: results of a pilot program.远程医疗随访代替门诊手术术后访视:一项试点计划的结果。
JAMA Surg. 2013 Sep;148(9):823-7. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.2672.
6
Preferred parental method of post-operative tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy follow-up (phone call vs. clinic visit).扁桃体切除术和腺样体切除术后随访的首选家长方式(电话随访与门诊复诊)
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Jan;92:181-185. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.11.025. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
7
Telephone Follow-Up for Emergency General Surgery Procedures: Safety and Implication for Health Resource Use.电话随访在急诊普通外科手术中的应用:安全性和对卫生资源利用的影响。
J Am Coll Surg. 2020 Feb;230(2):228-236. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.10.006. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
8
Cosmesis, patient satisfaction, and quality of life after da Vinci Single-Site cholecystectomy and multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: short-term results from a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.达芬奇单孔胆囊切除术与多孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术后的美容效果、患者满意度及生活质量:一项前瞻性、多中心、随机对照试验的短期结果
Surg Endosc. 2017 Aug;31(8):3242-3250. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5353-4. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
9
Digital Follow-Up After Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Feasibility Study.择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术的数字化随访:一项可行性研究。
World J Surg. 2022 Nov;46(11):2648-2658. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06684-w. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
10
Patient perspectives on postoperative visits after common general operative procedures.患者对常见普通手术术后就诊的看法。
Surgery. 2013 Oct;154(4):934-9; discussion 939-40. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.05.005. Epub 2013 Sep 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital Health Interventions and Patient Safety in Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.数字健康干预措施与腹部外科手术中的患者安全:系统评价与荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Apr 1;7(4):e248555. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.8555.
2
The efficiency of quick response code versus telephone contact for post-discharge follow-up after ophthalmic day surgery: a randomized controlled trial.快速响应码与电话随访在眼科日间手术后出院随访中的效率比较:一项随机对照试验。
Int Ophthalmol. 2023 Aug;43(8):2669-2677. doi: 10.1007/s10792-023-02666-6. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
3
Telemedicine versus face-to-face follow up in general surgery: a randomized controlled trial.
远程医疗与普通外科面对面随访的比较:一项随机对照试验。
ANZ J Surg. 2022 Oct;92(10):2544-2550. doi: 10.1111/ans.18028. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
4
Laparoscopic Appendectomy Translates into Less Analgesics and Faster Return to Work in Asia.亚洲的腹腔镜阑尾切除术可减少镇痛药用量并更快恢复工作。
JSLS. 2022 Apr-Jun;26(2). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2022.00006.
5
Utilization and Adequacy of Telemedicine for Outpatient Pediatric Surgical Care.远程医疗在儿科门诊外科护理中的利用和适宜性。
J Surg Res. 2022 Oct;278:179-189. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.04.060. Epub 2022 May 20.
6
Are Surgical Patients Satisfied With Remote Consultations? A Comparison of Remote Versus Conventional Outpatient Clinic Follow-Up for Surgical Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.手术患者对远程会诊满意吗?手术患者远程与传统门诊随访的比较:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Patient Exp. 2021 Jul 31;8:23743735211035916. doi: 10.1177/23743735211035916. eCollection 2021.
7
Current and future use of telemedicine in surgical clinics during and beyond COVID-19: A narrative review.COVID-19期间及之后外科诊所远程医疗的当前及未来应用:一篇叙述性综述
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Jun;66:102378. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102378. Epub 2021 May 8.
8
Patient preferences for using technology in communication about symptoms post hospital discharge.患者出院后在症状交流中使用技术的偏好。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb 15;21(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06119-7.