• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亚洲的腹腔镜阑尾切除术可减少镇痛药用量并更快恢复工作。

Laparoscopic Appendectomy Translates into Less Analgesics and Faster Return to Work in Asia.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore.

Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

出版信息

JSLS. 2022 Apr-Jun;26(2). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2022.00006.

DOI:10.4293/JSLS.2022.00006
PMID:35815330
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9215694/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is claimed to require less analgesic and allow for a faster return to work. This study examines whether these benefits hold true in Asian patient populations.

METHODS

A retrospective audit of emergency appendectomies over one year was conducted to study outcomes of postoperative pain, length of stay (LOS), duration of analgesia, and hospitalization leave (HL). A telephone questionnaire evaluated post-discharge analgesic intake, residual symptoms at follow-up, adequacy of HL and opinion on teleconsult reviews.

RESULTS

Of the 201 patients, 187 (93%) underwent LA. Presurgery symptoms were significantly longer in the open appendectomy (OA) group (mean: OA 3.79, LA 1.81 days; =0.026) which also had a higher frequency of perforation (71.4%). LA patients reported less pain compared to OA (LA 3.60 vs. OA 4.14; =0.068) but were prescribed the same 2 weeks of analgesics as OA. LOS was significantly less for LA (mean LA 3.09, OA 6.93 days; =0.006). Mean HL for LA and OA were 17.9 and 21.8 days respectively (=0.05). Nearly 83% patients did not complete the prescribed course of analgesics and 47% patients felt that HL was more than adequate. Seventy-five percent of patients were asymptomatic at hospital follow-up and nearly 41% agreed to teleconsult reviews.

CONCLUSION

Majority of LA patients do not need 2 weeks of analgesics and their HL can be shortened for faster return to work thereby realizing the true benefits of minimally invasive surgery. Selected cases can be offered postoperative teleconsultation.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)据称需要较少的镇痛,并且可以更快地恢复工作。本研究检查这些益处是否适用于亚洲患者人群。

方法

对一年中进行的急诊阑尾切除术进行回顾性审核,以研究术后疼痛、住院时间(LOS)、镇痛持续时间和住院假(HL)的结果。通过电话问卷调查评估出院后的镇痛摄入、随访时的残留症状、HL 的充分性以及对远程咨询审查的意见。

结果

在 201 名患者中,187 名(93%)接受了 LA。开放阑尾切除术(OA)组的术前症状明显更长(平均:OA 3.79,LA 1.81 天;=0.026),穿孔的发生率也更高(71.4%)。LA 患者报告的疼痛比 OA 少(LA 3.60 与 OA 4.14;=0.068),但与 OA 一样开了 2 周的镇痛药。LA 的 LOS 明显更短(平均 LA 3.09,OA 6.93 天;=0.006)。LA 和 OA 的平均 HL 分别为 17.9 和 21.8 天(=0.05)。近 83%的患者没有完成规定的镇痛药疗程,47%的患者认为 HL 足够。75%的患者在医院随访时无症状,近 41%的患者同意进行远程咨询审查。

结论

大多数 LA 患者不需要 2 周的镇痛药,并且可以缩短 HL,以更快地恢复工作,从而实现微创手术的真正益处。可以为选定的病例提供术后远程咨询。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d544/9215694/2e08c1630d0e/LS-JSLS220028F001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d544/9215694/2e08c1630d0e/LS-JSLS220028F001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d544/9215694/2e08c1630d0e/LS-JSLS220028F001.jpg

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic Appendectomy Translates into Less Analgesics and Faster Return to Work in Asia.亚洲的腹腔镜阑尾切除术可减少镇痛药用量并更快恢复工作。
JSLS. 2022 Apr-Jun;26(2). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2022.00006.
2
Needlescopic, laparoscopic, and open appendectomy: a comparative study.针式内镜、腹腔镜及开放式阑尾切除术:一项对比研究。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2001 Oct;11(5):306-12. doi: 10.1097/00129689-200110000-00004.
3
Complicated appendicitis in children: is laparoscopic appendectomy appropriate? A comparative study with the open appendectomy--our experience.儿童复杂性阑尾炎:腹腔镜阑尾切除术是否合适?与开腹阑尾切除术的比较研究——我们的经验。
J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Oct;44(10):1924-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.03.037.
4
Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy. Prospective randomized study of outcomes.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术。结局的前瞻性随机研究。
Arch Surg. 1997 Jul;132(7):708-11; discussion 712. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430310022003.
5
Laparoscopic appendectomy for simple and perforated appendicitis in children: the procedure of choice?小儿单纯性及穿孔性阑尾炎的腹腔镜阑尾切除术:是首选术式吗?
J Pediatr Surg. 2000 Nov;35(11):1582-5. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2000.18319.
6
Advantages of laparoscopic appendectomy in the elderly.老年患者行腹腔镜阑尾切除术的优势。
Am Surg. 2006 Jun;72(6):474-80.
7
Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy.腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术的临床疗效
JSLS. 2009 Oct-Dec;13(4):574-80. doi: 10.4293/108680809X1258998404524.
8
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: A retrospective cohort study on the management of acute appendicitis (simple and complicated) in children under 13 years of age.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗 13 岁以下儿童单纯性和复杂性急性阑尾炎的回顾性队列研究。
Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2021 Oct-Dec;18(4):182-186. doi: 10.4103/ajps.AJPS_102_20.
9
Laparoscopic appendectomy: a viable alternative approach.腹腔镜阑尾切除术:一种可行的替代方法。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 1997 Feb;7(1):1-6. doi: 10.1089/lap.1997.7.1.
10
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗穿孔性阑尾炎
J Gastrointest Surg. 2006 Jun;10(6):906-10. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.12.012.

引用本文的文献

1
Pain Management During Adult Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Systematic Review.成人腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的疼痛管理:一项系统综述。
Cureus. 2024 Jan 10;16(1):e52037. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52037. eCollection 2024 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
Conversion rate and risk factors of conversion to open in laparoscopic appendicectomy.腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的中转开腹率及中转开腹的危险因素。
Ann Coloproctol. 2022 Dec;38(6):409-414. doi: 10.3393/ac.2020.00437.0062. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
2
Moving from an era of open appendectomy to an era of laparoscopic appendectomy: A nationwide cohort study of adult patients undergoing surgery for appendicitis.从开腹阑尾切除术时代迈向腹腔镜阑尾切除术时代:一项针对接受阑尾炎手术的成年患者的全国性队列研究。
Scand J Surg. 2021 Dec;110(4):512-519. doi: 10.1177/1457496921992615. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
3
Disease burden of appendectomy for appendicitis: a population-based cohort study.
阑尾炎切除手术的疾病负担:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jan;34(1):116-125. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06738-6. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
4
A clinical comparison of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for the treatment of complicated appendicitis: historical cohort study.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎的临床比较:历史队列研究。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Aug;46(4):847-851. doi: 10.1007/s00068-019-01086-5. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
5
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗疑似阑尾炎
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 28;11(11):CD001546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001546.pub4.
6
Post-operative telephone review is safe and effective: prospective study - Monash outpatient review by phone trial.术后电话随访安全有效:前瞻性研究——莫纳什门诊电话随访试验
ANZ J Surg. 2018 May;88(5):434-439. doi: 10.1111/ans.14280. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
7
Outcomes of complicated appendicitis: Is conservative management as smooth as it seems?复杂阑尾炎的结局:保守治疗真的像看起来那么顺利吗?
Am J Surg. 2018 Apr;215(4):586-592. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.10.032. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
8
Acute appendicitis.急性阑尾炎
J Paediatr Child Health. 2017 Nov;53(11):1071-1076. doi: 10.1111/jpc.13737. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
9
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a retrospective cohort study assessing outcomes and cost-effectiveness.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术:一项评估结局和成本效益的回顾性队列研究
World J Emerg Surg. 2016 Aug 30;11(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13017-016-0102-5. eCollection 2016.
10
Acute appendicitis: modern understanding of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management.急性阑尾炎:发病机制、诊断和治疗的现代认识。
Lancet. 2015 Sep 26;386(10000):1278-1287. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00275-5.