Suppr超能文献

“获得或失去”:初级保健卫生服务评估中视角的重要性。

"Gaining or losing": The importance of the perspective in primary care health services valuation.

机构信息

Consultorio de Villamanta (CS Navalcarnero), Gerencia Asistencial de Atención Primaria, Madrid, Spain.

Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, Spain.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Dec 5;12(12):e0188969. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188969. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Economic theory classifies an intervention as socially beneficial if the total Willingness to Pay (WTP) of those who gain exceeds the total Willingness to accept (WTA) of those who are harmed. This paper examines the differences in health system users' valuation of a health care service in primary care setting based on the WTP and WTA perspectives, discussing the impact of personal and service variables, including risk attitudes, on these disparities.

METHOD

Six hundred and sixty two subjects who asked for care in health centres in the Region of Madrid (Spain) were interviewed, using the contingent valuation method to estimate WTP and WTA. Patient sociodemographic characteristics, health needs, satisfaction with the service and risk attitude and behaviour under risk (measured by self-reported scales and lottery games respectively) were collected. Generalised Linear Models were used to estimate the association between the explanatory variables and the WTA/WTP ratio.

RESULTS

We obtained the WTA/WTP ratio for 570 subjects (mean 1.66 CI 95%: 1.53-1.79; median 1, interquartile range 1-2). People with higher education or in high social groups expressed WTA values closest to WTP. The opposite occurred in patients with the greatest health needs or who were born abroad. Self-reported expression of risk aversion appeared also related to increases in the WTA/WTP ratio. Satisfaction with the service evaluated was the most influential factor in the WTA/WTP ratio.

CONCLUSION

Health need, difficulty in obtaining substitutes and satisfaction with the service could serve for profiling people averse to loss for health care services in primary care setting. Self-reported expression of risk aversion could also be related to increases in the WTA/WTP ratio. This would mean that these characteristics should be taken into account both in the design and implementation of new healthcare interventions, as in the making decision for disinvestment.

摘要

原理和目的

经济理论将干预措施归类为对社会有益的干预措施,如果受益方的总支付意愿(WTP)超过受损害方的总接受意愿(WTA)。本文从 WTP 和 WTA 的角度考察了初级保健环境中卫生系统使用者对医疗保健服务的价值评估差异,讨论了个人和服务变量(包括风险态度)对这些差异的影响。

方法

对马德里地区(西班牙)卫生中心就诊的 662 名患者进行了访谈,使用条件价值评估法估计 WTP 和 WTA。收集了患者的社会人口统计学特征、健康需求、对服务的满意度以及风险态度和风险下的行为(分别通过自我报告量表和彩票游戏进行测量)。使用广义线性模型估计解释变量与 WTA/WTP 比值之间的关联。

结果

我们获得了 570 名患者的 WTA/WTP 比值(平均值 1.66,CI95%:1.53-1.79;中位数 1,四分位距 1-2)。受教育程度较高或社会地位较高的人表达的 WTA 价值最接近 WTP。健康需求最大或出生在国外的患者则相反。自我报告的风险厌恶表达似乎也与 WTA/WTP 比值的增加有关。对所评估服务的满意度是 WTA/WTP 比值的最主要影响因素。

结论

健康需求、获得替代品的困难程度以及对服务的满意度可以用于描绘初级保健环境中对医疗保健服务持损失厌恶态度的人群。自我报告的风险厌恶表达也可能与 WTA/WTP 比值的增加有关。这意味着这些特征应在新医疗干预措施的设计和实施中以及在做出投资决策时考虑在内。

相似文献

1
"Gaining or losing": The importance of the perspective in primary care health services valuation.
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 5;12(12):e0188969. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188969. eCollection 2017.
5
WTP and WTA: do people think differently?
Soc Sci Med. 2007 Sep;65(5):946-57. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.04.014. Epub 2007 May 17.
10

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Reforming Spanish health care: a matter of survival.
Health Policy. 2015 Jan;119(1):107-10. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.10.020. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
3
Kinky thresholds revisited: opportunity costs differ in the NE and SW quadrants.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2015 Feb;13(1):7-13. doi: 10.1007/s40258-014-0136-3.
5
Unravelling the concept of consumer preference: implications for health policy and optimal planning in primary care.
Health Policy. 2010 Oct;97(2-3):105-12. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.04.005. Epub 2010 May 14.
7
Perception of the economic value of primary care services: a Willingness to Pay study.
Health Policy. 2010 Mar;94(3):266-72. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.11.001. Epub 2009 Nov 28.
8
Contingent valuation: what needs to be done?
Health Econ Policy Law. 2010 Jan;5(Pt 1):91-111. doi: 10.1017/S1744133109990016.
9
[Adaptation of a patient satisfaction questionnaire on medical and nursing care].
Aten Primaria. 2008 Dec;40(12):611-6. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(08)75694-4.
10
Loss aversion and cost effectiveness of healthcare programmes.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(11):895-8. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200826110-00001.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验