Karolinska Institute, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Sweden.
Uppsala University, Department of Surgical Sciences, Section for Forensic Medicine, Sweden.
Scand J Public Health. 2020 Feb;48(1):29-37. doi: 10.1177/1403494817745187. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
Statistics on drug-related deaths (DRD) provide crucial information on the drug situation. The European Monitoring Centre for Drug and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) has published a specification for extracting DRD from national mortality registers to be used in international comparisons. However, surprisingly little is known of the accuracy of DRD statistics derived from national mortality registers. This study assesses the accuracy of Swedish data derived from national mortality registers by comparing it with other sources of data. We compared five Swedish datasets. Three were derived from national mortality registers, two according to a Swedish specification and one according to the EMCDDA specification. A fourth dataset was based on toxicological analyses. We used a fifth dataset, an inventory of DRD in Stockholm, to assess the completeness and coverage of the Swedish datasets. All datasets were extracted from high-quality registers, but still did not capture all DRD, and both the numbers and demographic characteristics varied considerably. However, the time trends were consistent between the selections. In international comparisons, data completeness and investigation procedures may impact even more on stated numbers. .
药物相关死亡率(DRD)统计数据提供了有关毒品情况的重要信息。欧洲毒品和毒瘾监测中心(EMCDDA)发布了一项从国家死亡率登记册中提取 DRD 以用于国际比较的规范。然而,令人惊讶的是,人们对从国家死亡率登记册中得出的 DRD 统计数据的准确性知之甚少。本研究通过与其他数据源进行比较,评估了瑞典从国家死亡率登记册中获得的数据的准确性。我们比较了五个瑞典数据集。三个数据集来自国家死亡率登记册,两个数据集是根据瑞典规范编制的,一个数据集是根据欧洲毒品和毒瘾监测中心的规范编制的。第四个数据集基于毒理学分析。我们使用第五个数据集,即斯德哥尔摩 DRD 清单,来评估瑞典数据集的完整性和涵盖范围。所有数据集均从高质量的登记册中提取,但仍未捕获所有的 DRD,并且数量和人口统计学特征差异很大。然而,选择之间的时间趋势是一致的。在国际比较中,数据的完整性和调查程序甚至可能对报告的数字产生更大的影响。