Hong Tran Thi, Phuong Hoa Nguyen, Walker Sue M, Hill Peter S, Rao Chalapati
Fundamental Sciences Faculty, Hanoi University of Public Health, Hanoi, Viet Nam.
School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 25;13(1):e0190755. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190755. eCollection 2018.
Mortality statistics form a crucial component of national Health Management Information Systems (HMIS). However, there are limitations in the availability and quality of mortality data at national level in Viet Nam. This study assessed the completeness of recorded deaths and the reliability of recorded causes of death (COD) in the A6 death registers in the national routine HMIS in Viet Nam.
1477 identified deaths in 2014 were reviewed in two provinces. A capture-recapture method was applied to assess the completeness of the A6 death registers. 1365 household verbal autopsy (VA) interviews were successfully conducted, and these were reviewed by physicians who assigned multiple and underlying cause of death (UCOD). These UCODs from VA were then compared with the CODs recorded in the A6 death registers, using kappa scores to assess the reliability of the A6 death register diagnoses. The overall completeness of the A6 death registers in the two provinces was 89.3% (95%CI: 87.8-90.8). No COD recorded in the A6 death registers demonstrated good reliability. There is very low reliability in recording of cardiovascular deaths (kappa for stroke = 0.47 and kappa for ischaemic heart diseases = 0.42) and diabetes (kappa = 0.33). The reporting of deaths due to road traffic accidents, HIV and some cancers are at a moderate level of reliability with kappa scores ranging between 0.57-0.69 (p<0.01). VA methods identify more specific COD than the A6 death registers, and also allow identification of multiple CODs.
The study results suggest that data completeness in HMIS A6 death registers in the study sample of communes was relatively high (nearly 90%), but triangulation with death records from other sources would improve the completeness of this system. Further, there is an urgent need to enhance the reliability of COD recorded in the A6 death registers, for which VA methods could be effective. Focussed consultation among stakeholders is needed to develop a suitable mechanism and process for integrating VA methods into the national routine HMIS A6 death registers in Viet Nam.
死亡率统计是国家卫生管理信息系统(HMIS)的重要组成部分。然而,越南国家层面的死亡率数据在可得性和质量方面存在局限性。本研究评估了越南国家常规HMIS中A6死亡登记册中记录死亡的完整性以及记录死因(COD)的可靠性。
对两个省份2014年确定的1477例死亡病例进行了审查。采用捕获-再捕获方法评估A6死亡登记册的完整性。成功进行了1365例家庭口头尸检(VA)访谈,并由医生进行审查,医生确定了多种死因和根本死因(UCOD)。然后将这些来自VA的UCOD与A6死亡登记册中记录的COD进行比较,使用kappa分数评估A6死亡登记册诊断的可靠性。两个省份A6死亡登记册的总体完整性为89.3%(95%CI:87.8-90.8)。A6死亡登记册中记录的任何COD都未显示出良好的可靠性。心血管疾病死亡记录的可靠性非常低(中风的kappa值 = 0.47,缺血性心脏病的kappa值 = 0.42),糖尿病的可靠性也很低(kappa值 = 0.33)。道路交通事故、艾滋病毒和某些癌症导致的死亡报告的可靠性处于中等水平,kappa分数在0.57-0.69之间(p<0.01)。VA方法比A6死亡登记册能识别更具体的COD,并且还能识别多种COD。
研究结果表明,研究样本社区中HMIS A6死亡登记册的数据完整性相对较高(近90%),但与其他来源的死亡记录进行三角测量将提高该系统的完整性。此外,迫切需要提高A6死亡登记册中记录的COD的可靠性,VA方法可能对此有效。需要利益相关者之间进行有针对性的协商,以制定将VA方法纳入越南国家常规HMIS A6死亡登记册的合适机制和流程。