Division of Viral Products, Office of Vaccines Research and Review, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA.
Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Institute for Structural Biology, Drug Discovery and Development, School of Pharmacy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA.
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2017 Dec 6;6(12):e108. doi: 10.1038/emi.2017.96.
The M gene segment of influenza A virus has been shown to be a contributing factor to the high growth phenotype. However, it remains largely unknown why matrix protein 1 (M1), the major structural protein encoded by M gene, exhibits pH-dependent conformational changes during virus replication. Understanding the mechanisms underlying efficient virus replication can help to develop strategies not only to combat influenza infections but also to improve vaccine supplies. M(NLS-88R) and M(NLS-88E) are two M1 mutants differing by only a single amino acid: G88R vs G88E. G88R but not G88E was the compensatory mutation naturally selected by the virus after its nuclear localization signal was disrupted. Our study shows that, compared with M(NLS-88E) M1, M(NLS-88R) M1 dissociated quickly from viral ribonucleoproteins (vRNPs) at higher pH and took less time to dissemble in vitro, despite forming thicker matrix layer and having stronger association with vRNP in assembled virions. Correspondingly, M(NLS-88R) replicated more efficiently and was genetically more stable than M(NLS-88E). Crystallographic analysis indicated that M(NLS-88R) M1, like wild-type M1, is able to switch from a face-to-back-oriented conformation to a face-to-face-oriented conformation when pH drops from neutral to acidic, whereas G88E mutation causes M(NLS-88E) M1 to be trapped in a face-to-face-arranged conformation regardless of environmental pH. Our results suggest that maintaining M1 pH-dependent conformational flexibility is critical for efficient virus replication, and position 88 is a key residue controlling M1 pH-dependent conformational changes. Our findings provide insights into developing M1-based antiviral agents.
甲型流感病毒的 M 基因片段已被证明是高生长表型的一个促成因素。然而,基质蛋白 1(M1)是 M 基因编码的主要结构蛋白,为什么在病毒复制过程中表现出 pH 依赖性构象变化,这在很大程度上仍然未知。了解有效病毒复制的机制不仅有助于开发对抗流感感染的策略,还有助于提高疫苗供应。M(NLS-88R)和 M(NLS-88E)是 M1 中的两种突变体,仅在一个氨基酸上有所不同:G88R 与 G88E。G88R 而不是 G88E 是病毒在其核定位信号被破坏后自然选择的补偿突变。我们的研究表明,与 M(NLS-88E)M1 相比,M(NLS-88R)M1 在较高 pH 值下从病毒核糖核蛋白(vRNP)中快速解离,并且在体外组装的病毒中更快地解体,尽管形成更厚的基质层并且与 vRNP 更强地结合。相应地,M(NLS-88R)比 M(NLS-88E)复制更有效,遗传更稳定。晶体学分析表明,M(NLS-88R)M1 与野生型 M1 一样,当 pH 值从中性降至酸性时,能够从面向背面的构象切换到面向面的构象,而 G88E 突变导致 M(NLS-88E)M1 无论环境 pH 值如何,都被困在面向面排列的构象中。我们的结果表明,维持 M1 pH 依赖性构象灵活性对于有效病毒复制至关重要,并且 88 位是控制 M1 pH 依赖性构象变化的关键残基。我们的发现为开发基于 M1 的抗病毒药物提供了思路。