Suppr超能文献

内镜下修复外侧蝶骨脑膨出:病例系列

Endoscopic repair of lateral sphenoid Encephaloceles: a case series.

作者信息

Gore Mitchell R

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, SUNY-Upstate Medical University, Physicians Office Building North, Suite 4P 4900 Broad Road Syracuse, Syracuse, NY 13215 USA.

出版信息

BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord. 2017 Nov 28;17:11. doi: 10.1186/s12901-017-0044-x. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lateral sphenoid encephaloceles present a surgical challenge. These encephaloceles may be difficult to access given their lateral location and proximity to the neural and vascular structures of the sphenoid floor, pterygopalatine fossa, and lateral and superior sphenoid walls. Additionally, many patients have idiopathic intracranial hypertension, increasing the risk of recurrence. When untreated or undiscovered, these encephaloceles increase the risk of meningitis.

METHODS

All consecutive endoscopic repairs of lateral sphenoid encephaloceles by a single surgeon from 2012 to 2017 were analyzed for method of repair, complications, and recurrence rate. Odds ratio for recurrence of CSF leak for Alloderm inlay/abdominal fat sphenoid obliteration/nasoseptal flap with multilayer repair vs. other method (Alloderm onlay/contralateral nasoseptal flap or free mucosal graft) was compared, and Fischer's exact test was used to calculate the two-sided -value for the two repair methods.

RESULTS

The success rate (no recurrence of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea) for Alloderm inlay/abdominal fat onlay/nasoseptal flap onlay was 100% while for Alloderm onlay/contralateral nasoseptal flap + free mucosal graft the success rate was 0%. For any nasoseptal flap repair vs. free mucosal graft the success rates were 83.3% and 16.7% respectively. The success rate for Alloderm inlay/abdominal fat onlay/nasoseptal flap onlay vs. Alloderm onlay/contralateral nasoseptal flap + free mucosal graft was statistically significant ( = 0.048), but the success rate for any nasoseptal flap repair vs. free mucosal graft was not significant ( = 0.29). The success rate for patients without post-op lumbar drain vs. with post-op lumbar drain was also nonsignificant ( = 0.29).

CONCLUSIONS

In the author's hands Alloderm inlay/abdominal fat onlay/nasoseptal flap onlay was superior to other repair methods (Alloderm onlay/contralateral nasoseptal flap or free middle turbinate mucosa onlay graft). The complication rate was low. Post-operative lumbar drainage did not affect the success rate.

摘要

背景

外侧蝶骨脑膨出带来了手术挑战。鉴于这些脑膨出的外侧位置以及与蝶骨底、翼腭窝、蝶骨外侧壁和上壁的神经及血管结构相邻,可能难以进行手术。此外,许多患者患有特发性颅内高压,增加了复发风险。若未治疗或未被发现,这些脑膨出会增加脑膜炎风险。

方法

分析了2012年至2017年由同一外科医生连续进行的所有外侧蝶骨脑膨出的内镜修复手术,包括修复方法、并发症和复发率。比较了采用同种异体真皮植入/腹部脂肪蝶骨填塞/鼻中隔瓣多层修复与其他方法(同种异体真皮覆盖/对侧鼻中隔瓣或游离黏膜移植)时脑脊液漏复发的比值比,并使用费舍尔精确检验计算两种修复方法的双侧P值。

结果

同种异体真皮植入/腹部脂肪覆盖/鼻中隔瓣覆盖的成功率(脑脊液鼻漏无复发)为100%,而同种异体真皮覆盖/对侧鼻中隔瓣 + 游离黏膜移植的成功率为0%。对于任何鼻中隔瓣修复与游离黏膜移植,成功率分别为83.3%和16.7%。同种异体真皮植入/腹部脂肪覆盖/鼻中隔瓣覆盖与同种异体真皮覆盖/对侧鼻中隔瓣 + 游离黏膜移植的成功率具有统计学意义(P = 0.048),但任何鼻中隔瓣修复与游离黏膜移植的成功率无统计学意义(P = 0.29)。术后未放置腰大池引流的患者与放置腰大池引流的患者的成功率也无统计学意义(P = 0.29)。

结论

在作者的经验中,同种异体真皮植入/腹部脂肪覆盖/鼻中隔瓣覆盖优于其他修复方法(同种异体真皮覆盖/对侧鼻中隔瓣或游离中鼻甲黏膜覆盖移植)。并发症发生率低。术后腰大池引流不影响成功率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d10d/5704362/af9e5b512d1b/12901_2017_44_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验