Herrera-Gómez Francisco, Asensio-González María, González-López Anunciación, Álvarez F Javier
Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Nephrology, Complejo Asistencial de Zamora, Zamora, Spain.
Front Pharmacol. 2017 Nov 21;8:845. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00845. eCollection 2017.
Association between poor control of glycemia and the onset of microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients is a hard issue. However, it seems that the impact of pharmacological treatment is important only in early stages of diabetic nephropathy. We sought to examine whether intensive glycemic control is associated with improvement of clinical Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) outcomes compared to standard glycemic control. Meta-analysis of published and unpublished randomized controlled trials (RCT) and analysis of RCTs comparing anti-diabetic drugs and/or insulin (intensive control) vs. dietary measures (standard control) for relevant outcomes related to progression of CKD clinically manifest was undertaken. Summary estimates obtained by random effects model and funnel plots for assessing reporting bias are presented. Our analysis was based on four RCTs representing 27,391 adult T2DM patients with CKD from around the world. The pooled OR for the outcomes of doubling of serum creatinine and need of dialysis were, respectively, of 0.98 with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.81-1.19, and 0.84 with 95% CI 0.69-1.02. The pooled OR for the outcome of death from kidney failure was 0.62 with 95% CI 0.39-0.98. Clinical differences between studies were not translated in statistical heterogeneity. Reporting bias may be present. Intensive glycemic control has an effect on death from kidney failure compared to standard glycemic control. Better comprehension of glycemic control effects on both T2DM patients with and without CKD is important for individualization of these two treatment modalities.
2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者血糖控制不佳与微血管并发症的发生之间的关联是一个棘手的问题。然而,药物治疗的影响似乎仅在糖尿病肾病的早期阶段才重要。我们试图研究与标准血糖控制相比,强化血糖控制是否与临床慢性肾脏病(CKD)结局的改善相关。我们对已发表和未发表的随机对照试验(RCT)进行了荟萃分析,并对比较抗糖尿病药物和/或胰岛素(强化控制)与饮食措施(标准控制)对CKD临床进展相关结局的RCT进行了分析。给出了通过随机效应模型获得的汇总估计值以及用于评估报告偏倚的漏斗图。我们的分析基于四项RCT,这些试验代表了来自世界各地的27391名患有CKD的成年T2DM患者。血清肌酐翻倍和需要透析的结局的合并比值比(OR)分别为0.98,95%置信区间(95%CI)为0.81-1.19,以及0.84,95%CI为0.69-1.02。肾衰竭死亡结局的合并OR为0.62,95%CI为0.39-0.98。研究之间的临床差异并未转化为统计学异质性。可能存在报告偏倚。与标准血糖控制相比,强化血糖控制对肾衰竭死亡有影响。更好地理解血糖控制对患有和未患有CKD的T2DM患者的影响,对于这两种治疗方式的个体化很重要。