Boffano Michele, Mortera Stefano, Wafa Hazem, Piana Raimondo
CTO Hospital Turin, Italy.
Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
EFORT Open Rev. 2017 Oct 19;2(10):432-437. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.160085. eCollection 2017 Oct.
Acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injuries are common, but their incidence is probably underestimated. As the treatment of some sub-types is still debated, we reviewed the available literature to obtain an overview of current management.We analysed the literature using the PubMed search engine.There is consensus on the treatment of Rockwood type I and type II lesions and for high-grade injuries of types IV, V and VI. The treatment of type III injuries remains controversial, as none of the studies has proven a significant benefit of one procedure when compared with another.Several approaches can be considered in reaching a valid solution for treating ACJ lesions. The final outcome is affected by both vertical and horizontal post-operative ACJ stability. Synthetic devices, positioned using early open or arthroscopic procedures, are the main choice for young people.Type III injuries should be managed surgically only in cases with high-demand sporting or working activities. Cite this article: 2017;2:432-437. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.160085.
肩锁关节(ACJ)损伤很常见,但其发生率可能被低估了。由于某些亚型损伤的治疗仍存在争议,我们回顾了现有文献以了解当前的治疗概况。我们使用PubMed搜索引擎分析了文献。对于Rockwood I型和II型损伤以及IV型、V型和VI型的严重损伤的治疗,已达成共识。III型损伤的治疗仍存在争议,因为没有研究表明一种治疗方法相对于另一种方法有显著优势。在寻求治疗ACJ损伤的有效解决方案时,可以考虑几种方法。最终结果受术后肩锁关节垂直和水平稳定性的影响。使用早期开放手术或关节镜手术放置的合成装置是年轻人的主要选择。III型损伤仅在有高要求体育活动或工作的情况下才应进行手术治疗。引用本文:2017;2:432 - 437。DOI:10.1302/2058 - 5241.2.160085。