• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双相情感障碍患者在急性抑郁和躁狂发作期间的心理化缺陷:与认知功能的关联

Mentalization deficit in bipolar patients during an acute depressive and manic episode: association with cognitive functions.

作者信息

Bodnar Anna, Rybakowski Janusz K

机构信息

Department of Adult Psychiatry, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, ul.Szpitalna 27/33, 60-572, Poznan, Poland.

出版信息

Int J Bipolar Disord. 2017 Dec 6;5(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s40345-017-0107-3.

DOI:10.1186/s40345-017-0107-3
PMID:29209876
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6155478/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A number of studies in bipolar patients have shown a deficit in mentalization (theory of mind), one of the main aspects of social cognition. The aim of current study was to assess both cognitive and affective mentalization in well-defined groups of depressed and manic bipolar patients, compared to healthy control subjects, using a battery of tests measuring mentalization processes. The second aim was to investigate a possible relationship between cognitive and affective mentalization and cognitive functions in bipolar patients during a depressive and manic episode.

METHODS

The study involved 25 bipolar disorder type I patients (10 male, 15 female) during a depressive episode (mean 24 ± 2 points in the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale) and 25 patients (10 male, 15 female) during a manic episode (mean 27 ± 4 points in the Young Mania Rating Scale). The control group consisted of 25 healthy subjects (10 male, 15 female) without psychiatric disorders. To measure mentalization, a revised version of the Reading the Mind in the Eyes (R-MET), the Strange Stories (SS), the Faux Pas Recognition (FPR), and the Moving Shapes Paradigm (MSP) tests were used. Assessment of cognitive functioning was made using the Digit Span, Trail Making, and Wisconsin Card Sorting Tests.

RESULTS

In bipolar patients significant deficits in both cognitive and affective mentalization were demonstrated during both acute depressive and manic episodes. The impairment in FPR in manic patients was more severe than that in the depressive ones. On the other hand, in MSP, manic patients showed significantly increased intentionality for non-mentalization animations, compared with depressive patients and for "cause and effect" animations compared with control subjects. A significant relationship was found between the decrease in cognitive and affective mentalization and deficits of cognitive functions during both the depressive and manic episodes.

CONCLUSIONS

The results obtained confirm the deficits of mentalization in bipolar I patients, during both acute depressive and manic episodes. We found that in such patients mentalization deficits significantly correlated with cognitive dysfunctions more so during depressive episodes.

摘要

背景

多项针对双相情感障碍患者的研究表明,其在心理化(心理理论)方面存在缺陷,心理化是社会认知的主要方面之一。本研究的目的是,与健康对照受试者相比,使用一系列测量心理化过程的测试,评估明确界定的抑郁和躁狂双相情感障碍患者组的认知和情感心理化。第二个目的是研究双相情感障碍患者在抑郁和躁狂发作期间,认知和情感心理化与认知功能之间可能存在的关系。

方法

本研究纳入了25例处于抑郁发作期的Ⅰ型双相情感障碍患者(男性10例,女性15例)(17项汉密尔顿抑郁量表平均得分24±2分)和25例处于躁狂发作期的患者(男性10例,女性15例)(杨氏躁狂量表平均得分27±4分)。对照组由25名无精神疾病的健康受试者(男性10例,女性15例)组成。为测量心理化,使用了修订版的眼神读心测试(R-MET)、离奇故事测试(SS)、失礼识别测试(FPR)和动态形状范式测试(MSP)。使用数字广度测试、连线测试和威斯康星卡片分类测试评估认知功能。

结果

在双相情感障碍患者中,急性抑郁和躁狂发作期间均表现出认知和情感心理化的显著缺陷。躁狂患者的FPR损害比抑郁患者更严重。另一方面,在MSP测试中,与抑郁患者相比,躁狂患者对非心理化动画的意向性显著增加,与对照组相比,对“因果关系”动画的意向性也显著增加。在抑郁和躁狂发作期间,认知和情感心理化的下降与认知功能缺陷之间均发现了显著关系。

结论

所得结果证实了Ⅰ型双相情感障碍患者在急性抑郁和躁狂发作期间均存在心理化缺陷。我们发现,在这类患者中,心理化缺陷与认知功能障碍显著相关,在抑郁发作期间更为明显。

相似文献

1
Mentalization deficit in bipolar patients during an acute depressive and manic episode: association with cognitive functions.双相情感障碍患者在急性抑郁和躁狂发作期间的心理化缺陷:与认知功能的关联
Int J Bipolar Disord. 2017 Dec 6;5(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s40345-017-0107-3.
2
The relationship of Theory of Mind with symptoms and cognitive impairment in bipolar disorder: a prospective study.双相情感障碍中心理理论与症状及认知障碍的关系:一项前瞻性研究。
Psychiatriki. 2015 Jan-Mar;26(1):17-27.
3
Cognitive deficits in bipolar disorders: Implications for emotion.双相情感障碍中的认知缺陷:对情绪的影响。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2018 Feb;59:126-136. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
4
Clinical and cognitive factors affecting psychosocial functioning in remitted patients with bipolar disorder.影响双相情感障碍缓解期患者心理社会功能的临床和认知因素。
Psychiatriki. 2016 Jul-Sep;27(3):182-191. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2016.273.182.
5
Cognitive impairment in manic bipolar patients: important, understated, significant aspects.躁狂双相情感障碍患者的认知障碍:重要、被低估、显著的方面。
Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2015 Nov 25;14:41. doi: 10.1186/s12991-015-0080-0. eCollection 2015.
6
Cognitive functions and cognitive styles in young euthymic patients with bipolar I disorder.双相 I 障碍的年轻缓解期患者的认知功能和认知风格。
J Affect Disord. 2013 Oct;151(1):369-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.05.095. Epub 2013 Jul 5.
7
Increased affective empathy in bipolar patients during a manic episode.双相情感障碍患者躁狂发作期间情感共鸣增强。
Braz J Psychiatry. 2017 Oct-Dec;39(4):342-345. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2016-2101. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
8
Cognitive function across manic or hypomanic, depressed, and euthymic states in bipolar disorder.双相情感障碍中躁狂或轻躁狂、抑郁及心境正常状态下的认知功能。
Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Feb;161(2):262-70. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.2.262.
9
TEMPS-a scale in 'mixed' and 'pure' manic episodes: new data and methodological considerations on the relevance of joint anxious-depressive temperament traits.TEMPS-a量表在“混合”和“纯”躁狂发作中的应用:关于联合焦虑-抑郁气质特征相关性的新数据和方法学考量
J Affect Disord. 2003 Jan;73(1-2):99-104. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0327(02)00331-2.
10
Early report on brain arousal regulation in manic vs depressive episodes in bipolar disorder.双相障碍躁狂与抑郁发作时大脑唤醒调节的早期报告。
Bipolar Disord. 2016 Sep;18(6):502-510. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12440.

引用本文的文献

1
Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Irritable Bowel Syndrome: What Differences in Mentalization Abilities? A Scoping Review.炎症性肠病和肠易激综合征:心理化能力有何差异?范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Nov 30;20(23):7125. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20237125.
2
Mentalizing, Resilience, and Mental Health Status among Healthcare Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study.新冠疫情期间医护人员的心理化、心理韧性与心理健康状况:一项横断面研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Apr 20;20(8):5594. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20085594.
3
Nutrition, Overweight, and Cognition in Euthymic Bipolar Individuals Compared to Healthy Controls.营养、超重与心境正常的双相个体认知功能与健康对照比较。
Nutrients. 2022 Mar 11;14(6):1176. doi: 10.3390/nu14061176.
4
The Role of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex for Speech and Language Processing.背外侧前额叶皮质在言语和语言加工中的作用。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 May 17;15:645209. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.645209. eCollection 2021.
5
Digital Communication Biomarkers of Mood and Diagnosis in Borderline Personality Disorder, Bipolar Disorder, and Healthy Control Populations.边缘型人格障碍、双相情感障碍及健康对照人群中情绪与诊断的数字通信生物标志物
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 8;12:610457. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.610457. eCollection 2021.
6
Reflective Functioning in Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Non-Affective Psychosis and Affective Disorders-Differences and Similarities.肠易激综合征、非情感性精神病和情感障碍患者的反思功能——差异与相似之处
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 9;18(5):2780. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052780.
7
What Do You Have in Mind? Measures to Assess Mental State Reasoning in Neuropsychiatric Populations.你在想什么?评估神经精神疾病人群心理状态推理的方法。
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Jul 4;10:425. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00425. eCollection 2019.
8
Cognitive and Affective Empathy in Eating Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.饮食失调中的认知共情和情感共情:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Mar 4;10:102. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00102. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Increased affective empathy in bipolar patients during a manic episode.双相情感障碍患者躁狂发作期间情感共鸣增强。
Braz J Psychiatry. 2017 Oct-Dec;39(4):342-345. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2016-2101. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
2
Transcranial magnetic stimulation to dorsolateral prefrontal cortex affects conflict-induced behavioural adaptation in a Wisconsin Card Sorting Test analogue.经颅磁刺激背外侧前额叶皮层会影响威斯康星卡片分类测试模拟中冲突诱发的行为适应。
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Jan 8;94:36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.11.015. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
3
No differences in visual theory of mind abilities between euthymic bipolar patients and healthy controls.心境正常的双相情感障碍患者与健康对照者在视觉心理理论能力上无差异。
Int J Bipolar Disord. 2016 Dec;4(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s40345-016-0061-5. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
4
Social cognition in schizophrenia in comparison to bipolar disorder: A meta-analysis.精神分裂症与双相情感障碍的社会认知比较:一项荟萃分析。
Schizophr Res. 2016 Aug;175(1-3):72-78. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2016.04.018. Epub 2016 Apr 23.
5
Understanding the minds of others: A neuroimaging meta-analysis.理解他人的心智:一项神经影像学元分析。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Jun;65:276-91. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.03.020. Epub 2016 Apr 9.
6
The neurocognitive functioning in bipolar disorder: a systematic review of data.双相情感障碍中的神经认知功能:数据的系统综述
Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2015 Dec 1;14:42. doi: 10.1186/s12991-015-0081-z. eCollection 2015.
7
Meta-analysis of Theory of Mind (ToM) impairment in bipolar disorder.双相障碍的心理理论(ToM)损伤的荟萃分析。
Psychol Med. 2016 Jan;46(2):253-64. doi: 10.1017/S0033291715001993. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
8
Prefrontal lobe structural integrity and trail making test, part B: converging findings from surface-based cortical thickness and voxel-based lesion symptom analyses.前额叶结构完整性与连线测验B部分:基于表面的皮质厚度分析和基于体素的病变症状分析的趋同发现
Brain Imaging Behav. 2016 Sep;10(3):675-85. doi: 10.1007/s11682-015-9455-8.
9
Social cognition in schizophrenia.精神分裂症的社会认知。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2015 Oct;16(10):620-31. doi: 10.1038/nrn4005. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
10
The relationship of Theory of Mind with symptoms and cognitive impairment in bipolar disorder: a prospective study.双相情感障碍中心理理论与症状及认知障碍的关系:一项前瞻性研究。
Psychiatriki. 2015 Jan-Mar;26(1):17-27.