Suppr超能文献

植入式心脏除颤器与连续性左心室辅助装置患者的生存

Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators and Survival in Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients.

机构信息

From the Heart Research Follow-Up Program, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.

出版信息

ASAIO J. 2019 Jan;65(1):49-53. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000739.

Abstract

The association of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) with survival in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) is not well understood. We evaluated all-cause mortality by the presence of an ICD at the time of LVAD implantation, or by ICD implantation after LVAD placement in 191 patients, using Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and Cox models with multivariate adjustment. During the median follow-up of 23 months, 33 of 129 patients (26%) with an ICD and 17 of 62 patients (27%) without an ICD died. Patients had similar all-cause mortality with or without an ICD before LVAD, after censoring for post-LVAD ICD implantation (log-rank p = 0.889). Multivariate models after adjustments revealed no statistically significant survival benefit from an ICD before LVAD (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.27-1.57, p = 0.340). Thirty-one of 62 (50%) patients without an ICD before LVAD implantation subsequently received an ICD after LVAD, although these patients did not have significantly better survival when compared with those with no ICD in a time-dependent analysis (HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.25-1.95, p = 0.497). Among LVAD patients, neither a previously implanted ICD nor a new ICD implantation after LVAD yielded statistically significant survival benefit. Further studies are warranted to investigate the role of ICD implantation in LVAD patients.

摘要

植入式心脏复律除颤器 (ICD) 与左心室辅助装置 (LVAD) 患者生存率的关系尚不清楚。我们使用 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析和 Cox 模型进行多变量调整,评估了 191 例患者中 LVAD 植入时存在 ICD 或 LVAD 后植入 ICD 的全因死亡率。在中位随访 23 个月期间,129 例患者中有 33 例(26%)和 62 例患者中有 17 例(27%)死亡。在 LVAD 后对 ICD 植入进行删失后,有无 ICD 的患者在 LVAD 前的全因死亡率相似(对数秩检验 p = 0.889)。多变量模型调整后显示,在 LVAD 前 ICD 并无统计学上显著的生存获益(危险比 [HR]:0.65,95%置信区间:0.27-1.57,p = 0.340)。62 例无 LVAD 前 ICD 的患者中有 31 例(50%)在 LVAD 后植入了 ICD,但在时间依赖性分析中,与无 ICD 的患者相比,这些患者的生存率并无显著改善(HR:0.70,95%置信区间:0.25-1.95,p = 0.497)。在 LVAD 患者中,无论 LVAD 前是否植入 ICD 或 LVAD 后是否植入新 ICD,均未获得统计学上显著的生存获益。需要进一步研究以探讨 ICD 植入在 LVAD 患者中的作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验