From the Heart Research Follow-Up Program, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
ASAIO J. 2019 Jan;65(1):49-53. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000739.
The association of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) with survival in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) is not well understood. We evaluated all-cause mortality by the presence of an ICD at the time of LVAD implantation, or by ICD implantation after LVAD placement in 191 patients, using Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and Cox models with multivariate adjustment. During the median follow-up of 23 months, 33 of 129 patients (26%) with an ICD and 17 of 62 patients (27%) without an ICD died. Patients had similar all-cause mortality with or without an ICD before LVAD, after censoring for post-LVAD ICD implantation (log-rank p = 0.889). Multivariate models after adjustments revealed no statistically significant survival benefit from an ICD before LVAD (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.27-1.57, p = 0.340). Thirty-one of 62 (50%) patients without an ICD before LVAD implantation subsequently received an ICD after LVAD, although these patients did not have significantly better survival when compared with those with no ICD in a time-dependent analysis (HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.25-1.95, p = 0.497). Among LVAD patients, neither a previously implanted ICD nor a new ICD implantation after LVAD yielded statistically significant survival benefit. Further studies are warranted to investigate the role of ICD implantation in LVAD patients.
植入式心脏复律除颤器 (ICD) 与左心室辅助装置 (LVAD) 患者生存率的关系尚不清楚。我们使用 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析和 Cox 模型进行多变量调整,评估了 191 例患者中 LVAD 植入时存在 ICD 或 LVAD 后植入 ICD 的全因死亡率。在中位随访 23 个月期间,129 例患者中有 33 例(26%)和 62 例患者中有 17 例(27%)死亡。在 LVAD 后对 ICD 植入进行删失后,有无 ICD 的患者在 LVAD 前的全因死亡率相似(对数秩检验 p = 0.889)。多变量模型调整后显示,在 LVAD 前 ICD 并无统计学上显著的生存获益(危险比 [HR]:0.65,95%置信区间:0.27-1.57,p = 0.340)。62 例无 LVAD 前 ICD 的患者中有 31 例(50%)在 LVAD 后植入了 ICD,但在时间依赖性分析中,与无 ICD 的患者相比,这些患者的生存率并无显著改善(HR:0.70,95%置信区间:0.25-1.95,p = 0.497)。在 LVAD 患者中,无论 LVAD 前是否植入 ICD 或 LVAD 后是否植入新 ICD,均未获得统计学上显著的生存获益。需要进一步研究以探讨 ICD 植入在 LVAD 患者中的作用。