Bush K M, Sidman M, de Rose T
Department of Psychology, Washington and Jefferson College, Washington, Pennsylvania 15301.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Jan;51(1):29-45. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.51-29.
Three college students in Experiment 1 and 1 student in Experiment 2 learned visual conditional discriminations under contextual control by tones; the visual comparison stimulus that was correct with a given sample stimulus depended on whether a high tone or a low tone was present. Two of the subjects in Experiment 1 then demonstrated the emergence of two sets of contextually controlled three-member classes of equivalent stimuli, and the subject in Experiment 2 showed the emergence of contextually controlled four-member classes; the class membership of each stimulus varied as a function of the tones. Class membership was demonstrated by the subjects' performance of new conditional discriminations that they had never been taught directly. In Experiment 2, the procedures were intended to ensure that the tones exerted second-order conditional control and did not simply form compounds with each of the visual stimuli, but the subject's verbal description of the tasks suggested that this intention might not have been successful. It could not be ascertained, therefore, whether the tones exerted contextual control as independent second-order conditional stimuli or simply as common elements of auditory-visual stimulus compounds.
实验1中的三名大学生和实验2中的一名学生在音调的情境控制下学习视觉条件辨别;与给定样本刺激相对应的正确视觉比较刺激取决于出现的是高音还是低音。实验1中的两名受试者随后展示了两组情境控制的由三个等效刺激组成的类别出现,实验2中的受试者展示了情境控制的由四个刺激组成的类别出现;每个刺激的类别成员身份随音调而变化。类别成员身份通过受试者对从未直接教授过的新条件辨别的表现得以证明。在实验2中,程序旨在确保音调施加二阶条件控制,而不仅仅是与每个视觉刺激形成复合刺激,但受试者对任务的口头描述表明这一意图可能未成功。因此,无法确定音调是作为独立的二阶条件刺激施加情境控制,还是仅仅作为视听刺激复合物的共同元素。