• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与院前胸痛患者接受高级心脏护理相关的因素。

Factors associated with advanced cardiac care in prehospital chest pain patients.

机构信息

UPMC, Department of Emergency Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.

Allegheny Health Network, Department of Emergency Medicine, Erie, PA, United States.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Jul;36(7):1182-1187. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.12.003. Epub 2017 Dec 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2017.12.003
PMID:29217178
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6632084/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Many patients transported by emergency medical services (EMS) may require advanced cardiac care but do not have ST-segment elevation (STEMI) on the initial prehospital EKG. We sought to identify factors associated with the need for advanced cardiac care in undifferentiated EMS patients reporting chest pain in the absence of STEMI on EKG.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of all adult patients, reporting atraumatic chest pain from a single EMS agency, presenting to a single, urban hospital over a 10-year period. Patients with STEMI on prehospital electrocardiogram were excluded. Patient demographics, chest pain characteristics and prehospital factors were abstracted for all patients. We identified those patients that required advanced cardiac care and performed regression analysis to determine associated factors.

RESULTS

A total of 956 charts were analyzed. Of this total, 193 patients (20.2%) met the primary composite outcome. Of the outcome group, 185 patients (95.9%) had coronary artery disease documented on cardiac catheterization, 22 patients (11.4%) underwent CABG, and seven patients (3.6%) died in the hospital. Most significant variables (multivariable IRR) included age (1.02), male gender (1.65), history of MI (1.47), PCI (1.66), hyperlipidemia (1.40), diaphoresis (1.51), home aspirin (1.53), and improvement with EMS treatment (1.60).

CONCLUSION

We have identified several factors that could be considered when risk stratifying prehospital patients reporting chest pain. While potentially predictive, the factors are broad and support the need for other objective factors that could augment prediction of patients who may benefit from early advanced cardiac care.

摘要

简介

许多由紧急医疗服务(EMS)转运的患者可能需要高级心脏护理,但初始院前 EKG 上没有 ST 段抬高(STEMI)。我们试图确定在 EKG 上无 STEMI 的情况下报告胸痛的未分化 EMS 患者中与高级心脏护理需求相关的因素。

方法

我们对来自单一 EMS 机构报告创伤性胸痛的所有成年患者进行了回顾性分析,这些患者在 10 年内到单一城市医院就诊。排除了院前心电图上有 STEMI 的患者。对所有患者提取患者人口统计学资料、胸痛特征和院前因素。我们确定了需要高级心脏护理的患者,并进行回归分析以确定相关因素。

结果

共分析了 956 份图表。在这总数中,193 名患者(20.2%)符合主要复合结局。在结果组中,185 名患者(95.9%)的冠状动脉疾病在心脏导管插入术上有记录,22 名患者(11.4%)接受了 CABG,7 名患者(3.6%)在医院死亡。最显著的变量(多变量 IRR)包括年龄(1.02)、男性(1.65)、MI 史(1.47)、PCI(1.66)、高血脂(1.40)、出汗(1.51)、家庭使用阿司匹林(1.53)和 EMS 治疗改善(1.60)。

结论

我们已经确定了一些在对报告胸痛的院前患者进行风险分层时可以考虑的因素。虽然具有预测性,但这些因素很广泛,支持需要其他客观因素来增强对可能受益于早期高级心脏护理的患者的预测。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68cf/6632084/f86311dae767/nihms-1038137-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68cf/6632084/f86311dae767/nihms-1038137-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68cf/6632084/f86311dae767/nihms-1038137-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Factors associated with advanced cardiac care in prehospital chest pain patients.与院前胸痛患者接受高级心脏护理相关的因素。
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Jul;36(7):1182-1187. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.12.003. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
2
Prehospital Modified HEART Score Predictive of 30-Day Adverse Cardiac Events.院前改良HEART评分对30天不良心脏事件的预测作用
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018 Feb;33(1):58-62. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X17007154. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
3
Prehospital aspirin administration for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the USA: an EMS quality assessment using the NEMSIS 2011 database.美国急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者的院前阿司匹林给药情况:一项使用2011年国家急诊医疗服务信息系统(NEMSIS)数据库的急诊医疗服务质量评估
Emerg Med J. 2015 Nov;32(11):876-81. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2014-204299. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
4
Prehospital use of aspirin rarely is associated with adverse events.院前使用阿司匹林很少与不良事件相关。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2004 Oct-Dec;19(4):362-5. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00001990.
5
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention for patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: process improvements in rural prehospital care delivered by emergency medical services.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的应用:急救医疗服务在农村院前急救中提高的治疗效果。
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2010 Nov-Dec;53(3):210-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2010.09.003.
6
Characteristics of Prehospital Electrocardiogram Use in North Carolina Using a Novel Linkage of Emergency Medical Services and Emergency Department Data.利用紧急医疗服务和急诊部数据的新型关联,研究北卡罗来纳州院前心电图使用的特征。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019 Nov-Dec;23(6):772-779. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2019.1597230. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
7
Frequency of non-ST-segment elevation injury patterns on prehospital electrocardiograms.院前心电图中非 ST 段抬高损伤模式的频率。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2010 Jan-Mar;14(1):1-5. doi: 10.3109/10903120903144924.
8
Using EMS Dispatch to Trigger STEMI Alerts Decreases Door-to-Balloon Times.利用急救医疗服务调度触发ST段抬高型心肌梗死警报可缩短门球时间。
West J Emerg Med. 2015 May;16(3):472-80. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.4.24248. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
9
Prevalence and interventional outcomes of patients with resolution of ST-segment elevation between prehospital and in-hospital ECG.院前与院内心电图ST段抬高消退患者的患病率及介入治疗结果
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014 Apr-Jun;18(2):174-9. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2013.851310. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
10
Use of prehospital 12-lead electrocardiography and treatment times among ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients with atypical symptoms.院前 12 导联心电图的使用与非典型症状 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的治疗时间。
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Aug;21(8):892-8. doi: 10.1111/acem.12445. Epub 2014 Aug 24.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comparison of Interpretable Machine Learning Approaches to Identify Outpatient Clinical Phenotypes Predictive of First Acute Myocardial Infarction.用于识别预测首次急性心肌梗死的门诊临床表型的可解释机器学习方法比较
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Aug 10;14(16):1741. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14161741.
2
Prediction of inappropriate pre-hospital transfer of patients with suspected cardiovascular emergency diseases using machine learning: a retrospective observational study.使用机器学习预测疑似心血管急症患者的不当院前转院:一项回顾性观察研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Apr 6;23(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02149-9.
3

本文引用的文献

1
2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.2014年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 23;64(24):e139-e228. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
2
Symptoms of myocardial infarction: concordance between paramedic and hospital records.心肌梗死症状:护理人员记录与医院记录的一致性
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014 Jul-Sep;18(3):393-401. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2014.891064. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
3
Development of Prediction Models for Acute Myocardial Infarction at Prehospital Stage with Machine Learning Based on a Nationwide Database.
基于全国性数据库,利用机器学习开发院前急性心肌梗死预测模型
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022 Dec 2;9(12):430. doi: 10.3390/jcdd9120430.
4
Prehospital Translation of Chest Pain Tools (RESCUE Study): Completion Rate and Inter-rater Reliability.院前胸痛工具翻译(RESCUE 研究):完成率和评价者间信度。
West J Emerg Med. 2022 Jan 18;23(2):222-228. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2021.9.52325.
5
Prehospital stratification in acute chest pain patient into high risk and low risk by emergency medical service: a prospective cohort study.通过紧急医疗服务对急性胸痛患者进行院前分层为高风险和低风险:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 15;11(4):e044938. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044938.
6
Lack of Significant Coronary History and ECG Misinterpretation Are the Strongest Predictors of Undertriage in Prehospital Chest Pain.无明显冠心病史和心电图误判是院前胸痛分诊不足的最强预测因素。
J Emerg Nurs. 2019 Mar;45(2):161-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2018.10.007. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
Chest pain in an out-of-hospital emergency setting: no relationship between pain severity and diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction.
院外急救环境中的胸痛:疼痛严重程度与急性心肌梗死诊断之间无关联。
Pain Pract. 2015 Apr;15(4):343-7. doi: 10.1111/papr.12178. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
4
Development and validation of the Emergency Department Assessment of Chest pain Score and 2 h accelerated diagnostic protocol.胸痛评分和 2 h 加速诊断方案的开发和验证。
Emerg Med Australas. 2014 Feb;26(1):34-44. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12164. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
5
Chest pain in the emergency room: value of the HEART score.急诊科胸痛:HEART 评分的价值。
Neth Heart J. 2008 Jun;16(6):191-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03086144.
6
Application of the TIMI risk score for unstable angina and non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome to an unselected emergency department chest pain population.将不稳定型心绞痛和非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征的TIMI风险评分应用于未经筛选的急诊科胸痛患者群体。
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Jan;13(1):13-8. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.06.031. Epub 2005 Dec 19.
7
Predicting a life-threatening disease and death among ambulance-transported patients with chest pain or other symptoms raising suspicion of an acute coronary syndrome.预测通过救护车转运的胸痛患者或其他引发急性冠状动脉综合征怀疑症状的患者中危及生命的疾病和死亡情况。
Am J Emerg Med. 2002 Nov;20(7):588-94. doi: 10.1053/ajem.2002.35461.
8
A prediction model for prehospital triage of patients with suspected cardiac ischemia.疑似心脏缺血患者院前分诊的预测模型。
J Electrocardiol. 2000;33 Suppl:253-8. doi: 10.1054/jelc.2000.20299.
9
The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: A method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making.不稳定型心绞痛/非ST段抬高型心肌梗死的TIMI风险评分:一种用于预后评估和治疗决策的方法。
JAMA. 2000 Aug 16;284(7):835-42. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.7.835.
10
Chart reviews in emergency medicine research: Where are the methods?急诊医学研究中的病历审查:方法何在?
Ann Emerg Med. 1996 Mar;27(3):305-8. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(96)70264-0.