• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于识别预测首次急性心肌梗死的门诊临床表型的可解释机器学习方法比较

A Comparison of Interpretable Machine Learning Approaches to Identify Outpatient Clinical Phenotypes Predictive of First Acute Myocardial Infarction.

作者信息

Hodgman Matthew, Minoccheri Cristian, Mathis Michael, Wittrup Emily, Najarian Kayvan

机构信息

Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Aug 10;14(16):1741. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14161741.

DOI:10.3390/diagnostics14161741
PMID:39202229
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11353976/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute myocardial infarctions are deadly to patients and burdensome to healthcare systems. Most recorded infarctions are patients' first, occur out of the hospital, and often are not accompanied by cardiac comorbidities. The clinical manifestations of the underlying pathophysiology leading to an infarction are not fully understood and little effort exists to use explainable machine learning to learn predictive clinical phenotypes before hospitalization is needed.

METHODS

We extracted outpatient electronic health record data for 2641 case and 5287 matched-control patients, all without pre-existing cardiac diagnoses, from the Michigan Medicine Health System. We compare six different interpretable, feature extraction approaches, including temporal computational phenotyping, and train seven interpretable machine learning models to predict the onset of first acute myocardial infarction within six months.

RESULTS

Using temporal computational phenotypes significantly improved the model performance compared to alternative approaches. The mean cross-validation test set performance exhibited area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values as high as 0.674. The most consistently predictive phenotypes of a future infarction include back pain, cardiometabolic syndrome, family history of cardiovascular diseases, and high blood pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

Computational phenotyping of longitudinal health records can improve classifier performance and identify predictive clinical concepts. State-of-the-art interpretable machine learning approaches can augment acute myocardial infarction risk assessment and prioritize potential risk factors for further investigation and validation.

摘要

背景

急性心肌梗死对患者来说是致命的,也给医疗系统带来负担。大多数已记录的梗死是患者首次发生的,发生在院外,且通常不伴有心脏合并症。导致梗死的潜在病理生理学的临床表现尚未完全了解,并且几乎没有努力利用可解释的机器学习来在需要住院治疗之前了解预测性临床表型。

方法

我们从密歇根医学健康系统中提取了2641例病例和5287例匹配对照患者的门诊电子健康记录数据,所有患者均无既往心脏诊断。我们比较了六种不同的可解释特征提取方法,包括时间计算表型分析,并训练了七个可解释的机器学习模型来预测六个月内首次急性心肌梗死的发作。

结果

与其他方法相比,使用时间计算表型分析显著提高了模型性能。平均交叉验证测试集性能显示受试者工作特征曲线下面积值高达0.674。未来梗死最一致的预测表型包括背痛、心脏代谢综合征、心血管疾病家族史和高血压。

结论

纵向健康记录的计算表型分析可以提高分类器性能并识别预测性临床概念。最先进的可解释机器学习方法可以增强急性心肌梗死风险评估,并为进一步调查和验证潜在风险因素确定优先级。

相似文献

1
A Comparison of Interpretable Machine Learning Approaches to Identify Outpatient Clinical Phenotypes Predictive of First Acute Myocardial Infarction.用于识别预测首次急性心肌梗死的门诊临床表型的可解释机器学习方法比较
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Aug 10;14(16):1741. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14161741.
2
Machine Learning to Predict the Likelihood of Acute Myocardial Infarction.机器学习预测急性心肌梗死的可能性
Circulation. 2019 Sep 10;140(11):899-909. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.041980. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
3
Development and validation of an interpretable 3 day intensive care unit readmission prediction model using explainable boosting machines.使用可解释增强机器开发并验证一个可解释的重症监护病房3天再入院预测模型。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 23;9:960296. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.960296. eCollection 2022.
4
An Interpretable Longitudinal Preeclampsia Risk Prediction Using Machine Learning.一种使用机器学习的可解释性纵向子痫前期风险预测
medRxiv. 2023 Aug 16:2023.08.16.23293946. doi: 10.1101/2023.08.16.23293946.
5
Interpretable Machine Learning Prediction of Drug-Induced QT Prolongation: Electronic Health Record Analysis.可解释机器学习预测药物诱导的 QT 间期延长:电子健康记录分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Dec 1;24(12):e42163. doi: 10.2196/42163.
6
Relational machine learning for electronic health record-driven phenotyping.用于电子健康记录驱动的表型分析的关系机器学习。
J Biomed Inform. 2014 Dec;52:260-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.07.007. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
7
A Machine Learning Model for Risk Stratification of Postdiagnosis Diabetic Ketoacidosis Hospitalization in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes: Retrospective Study.用于1型糖尿病儿童诊断后糖尿病酮症酸中毒住院风险分层的机器学习模型:回顾性研究
JMIR Diabetes. 2024 Aug 7;9:e53338. doi: 10.2196/53338.
8
Application of machine learning to predict the occurrence of arrhythmia after acute myocardial infarction.机器学习在预测急性心肌梗死后心律失常发生中的应用。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Nov 2;21(1):301. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01667-8.
9
Use of Machine Learning Models to Predict Death After Acute Myocardial Infarction.利用机器学习模型预测急性心肌梗死后的死亡。
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Jun 1;6(6):633-641. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.0122.
10
Using Machine Learning Models to Predict In-Hospital Mortality for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients.使用机器学习模型预测ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的院内死亡率。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;245:476-480.

本文引用的文献

1
The global prevalence of myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.全球心肌梗死的患病率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023 Apr 22;23(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03231-w.
2
Chronic Pain-Associated Cardiovascular Disease: The Role of Sympathetic Nerve Activity.慢性痛相关心血管疾病:交感神经活动的作用。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Mar 11;24(6):5378. doi: 10.3390/ijms24065378.
3
Development of Prediction Models for Acute Myocardial Infarction at Prehospital Stage with Machine Learning Based on a Nationwide Database.
基于全国性数据库,利用机器学习开发院前急性心肌梗死预测模型
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022 Dec 2;9(12):430. doi: 10.3390/jcdd9120430.
4
XGBoost, A Novel Explainable AI Technique, in the Prediction of Myocardial Infarction: A UK Biobank Cohort Study.XGBoost,一种新型可解释人工智能技术,用于心肌梗死预测:一项英国生物银行队列研究。
Clin Med Insights Cardiol. 2022 Nov 8;16:11795468221133611. doi: 10.1177/11795468221133611. eCollection 2022.
5
A Novel Tropical Geometry-Based Interpretable Machine Learning Method: Pilot Application to Delivery of Advanced Heart Failure Therapies.一种新颖的基于热带几何的可解释机器学习方法:在心力衰竭先进治疗方案中的初步应用。
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2023 Jan;27(1):239-250. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2022.3211765. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
6
Acute Anemia and Myocardial Infarction.急性贫血与心肌梗死
Cureus. 2021 Aug 11;13(8):e17096. doi: 10.7759/cureus.17096. eCollection 2021 Aug.
7
Cardiovascular Disease in Chronic Kidney Disease: Pathophysiological Insights and Therapeutic Options.慢性肾脏病中的心血管疾病:病理生理学见解与治疗选择。
Circulation. 2021 Mar 16;143(11):1157-1172. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.050686. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
8
Type 2 Diabetes and Myocardial Infarction: Recent Clinical Evidence and Perspective.2型糖尿病与心肌梗死:最新临床证据与展望
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Feb 24;8:644189. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.644189. eCollection 2021.
9
Trends, Management, and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction Hospitalizations With In-Hospital-Onset Versus Out-of-Hospital Onset: The ARIC Study.急性心肌梗死住院患者院内发病与院外发病的趋势、管理和结局:ARIC 研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Jan 19;10(2):e018414. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.018414. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
10
Hyperchloremia in critically ill patients: association with outcomes and prediction using electronic health record data.危重症患者高氯血症:与结局的关联及使用电子健康记录数据的预测。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Dec 15;20(Suppl 14):302. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01326-4.