Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Gentofte, Denmark.
Unit for Epidemiology and Biostatics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Resuscitation. 2018 Mar;124:138-144. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.11.067. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
Despite wide dissemination of automated external defibrillators (AEDs), bystander defibrillation rates remain low. We aimed to investigate how route distance to the nearest accessible AED was associated with probability of bystander defibrillation in public and residential locations.
We used data from the nationwide Danish Cardiac Arrest Registry and the Danish AED Network to identify out-of-hospital cardiac arrests and route distances to nearest accessible registered AED during 2008-2013. The association between route distance and bystander defibrillation was described using restricted cubic spline logistic regression.
We included 6971 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases. The proportion of arrests according to distance in meters (≤100, 101-200, >200) to the nearest accessible AED was: 4.6% (n=320), 5.3% (n=370), and 90.1% (n=6281), respectively. For cardiac arrests in public locations, the probability of bystander defibrillation at 0, 100 and 200m from the nearest AED was 35.7% (95% confidence interval 28.0%-43.5%), 21.3% (95% confidence interval 17.4%-25.2%), and 13.7% (95% confidence interval 10.1%-16.8%), respectively. The corresponding numbers for cardiac arrests in residential locations were 7.0% (95% confidence interval -2.1%-16.1%), 1.5% (95% confidence interval 0.002%-2.8%), and 0.9% (95% confidence interval 0.0005%-1.7%), respectively.
In public locations, the probability of bystander defibrillation decreased rapidly within the first 100m route distance from cardiac arrest to nearest accessible AED whereas the probability of bystander defibrillation was low for all distances in residential areas.
尽管自动体外除颤器(AED)已经广泛普及,但旁观者除颤率仍然较低。我们旨在研究距离最近可获取的 AED 的路线距离与公共和居住场所旁观者除颤的可能性之间存在何种关联。
我们使用全国丹麦心脏骤停注册处和丹麦 AED 网络的数据,在 2008-2013 年间识别院外心脏骤停和距离最近的可注册 AED 的路线距离。使用限制性立方样条逻辑回归来描述路线距离与旁观者除颤之间的关联。
我们纳入了 6971 例院外心脏骤停病例。根据距离最近可获取的 AED 的米数(≤100、101-200、>200),将病例分为以下比例:4.6%(n=320)、5.3%(n=370)和 90.1%(n=6281)。对于公共区域的心脏骤停,距离最近的 AED 为 0、100 和 200m 处旁观者除颤的概率分别为 35.7%(95%置信区间 28.0%-43.5%)、21.3%(95%置信区间 17.4%-25.2%)和 13.7%(95%置信区间 10.1%-16.8%)。相应地,在住宅区域的心脏骤停,概率分别为 7.0%(95%置信区间-2.1%-16.1%)、1.5%(95%置信区间 0.002%-2.8%)和 0.9%(95%置信区间 0.0005%-1.7%)。
在公共区域,距离最近可获取的 AED 的 100m 内,旁观者除颤的概率迅速下降,而在住宅区域,所有距离的旁观者除颤概率都较低。