Suppr超能文献

院外心脏骤停期间旁观者在场情况、心肺复苏实施率及自动体外除颤器使用情况

Bystander availability, CPR uptake, and AED use during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

作者信息

Sidebottom David B, Painting Robyn, Deakin Charles D

机构信息

South Central Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.

University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Resusc Plus. 2025 Apr 30;24:100969. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100969. eCollection 2025 Jul.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and defibrillation of a shockable rhythm improve survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Little data exists on bystander participation during genuine cardiac arrest calls.

METHOD

This was a prospective audit of bystander participation during OHCA calls to a single ambulance service in the United Kingdom. A convenience sample of consecutive OHCA calls from March 2022 until April 2023, where an adult cardiac arrest was confirmed and CPR was advised, was audited by a call handler. Cases with a valid do not attempt CPR decision were excluded. Data on key time intervals and bystander participation were extracted and analysed in R (v4.2).

RESULTS

In total, 451 cases were analysed. Median time until cardiac arrest recognition was 42 s (IQR 94.7 s) and until the initiation of CPR was 161 s (IQR 124 s). A lone bystander was present in 162 (35.9%) cases, two bystanders in 149 (33.0%) cases, and three or more bystanders in 140 (31.0%) cases. CPR was attempted by a bystander in 382 (84.7%) cases. Physical inability, refusal, and inability to correctly position patient were common reasons for not performing CPR. A defibrillator was retrieved before the arrival of emergency medical services in 36 (8%) cases and a shock was administered in 9 (2%) cases, while a shock was not advised in 20 (4%) further cases.

CONCLUSION

Cardiac arrest was identified rapidly but there was a delay to initiation of CPR. A lone bystander was present in over one third of cases, eliminating the possibility of bystander defibrillation in the absence of a lay first responder.

摘要

背景

旁观者心肺复苏(CPR)以及对可电击心律进行除颤可提高院外心脏骤停(OHCA)后的生存率。关于在真正的心脏骤停呼叫期间旁观者参与情况的数据很少。

方法

这是一项对英国一家单一救护车服务机构接到的OHCA呼叫期间旁观者参与情况的前瞻性审计。对2022年3月至2023年4月期间连续的OHCA呼叫进行便利抽样,这些呼叫中确认发生成人心脏骤停并建议进行心肺复苏,由一名呼叫处理人员进行审计。排除有有效“不尝试心肺复苏”决定的病例。在R(v4.2)中提取并分析关键时间间隔和旁观者参与情况的数据。

结果

总共分析了451例病例。从心脏骤停识别到开始心肺复苏的中位时间分别为42秒(四分位距94.7秒)和161秒(四分位距124秒)。162例(35.9%)病例中有一名旁观者在场,149例(33.0%)病例中有两名旁观者在场,140例(31.0%)病例中有三名或更多旁观者在场。382例(84.7%)病例中有旁观者尝试进行心肺复苏。身体无法进行、拒绝以及无法正确安置患者是未进行心肺复苏的常见原因。在紧急医疗服务到达之前,36例(8%)病例中有人取回了除颤器,9例(2%)病例中进行了电击,另有20例(4%)病例不建议进行电击。

结论

心脏骤停被迅速识别,但开始心肺复苏存在延迟。超过三分之一的病例中有一名旁观者在场,这排除了在没有非专业急救人员的情况下旁观者进行除颤的可能性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fab9/12148603/9bdc8c0f4aa7/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验