• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英联邦国家心理健康政策综述

A review of mental health policies from Commonwealth countries.

机构信息

1 Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

2 Centre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune, India.

出版信息

Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;64(1):3-8. doi: 10.1177/0020764017745108. Epub 2017 Dec 8.

DOI:10.1177/0020764017745108
PMID:29219010
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The burden of disease related to mental disorders across the world is substantial. However, there remains inequality between funding for clinical and research activities between physical illness and mental illness in almost all countries.

AIMS

One way of reducing this inequality is to ensure that mental health policies reflect this. We were interested in looking at the policies of members of Commonwealth.

METHOD

We decided to survey 52 member countries of the Commonwealth to explore whether mental health policies existed and whether there was equity between physical and mental health services funding. Using World Health Organization (WHO) data sets and other sources when indicated, we looked at the existence and contents of mental health policies.

RESULTS

We found that less than half of the countries had a mental health policy. Deinstitutionalization was not seen as a priority in many countries and there was no equity between physical and mental health funding. Although integration between physical and mental health care was recommended in many countries, there was a clear gap.

CONCLUSION

It is apparent that there is still a long way to go in terms of equity between physical and mental health in terms of funding in member states of the Commonwealth. These findings confirm earlier observations of discrimination against people with mental illness. We suggest that there must be mechanisms in place to facilitate and support change wherever required.

摘要

背景

全球范围内,与精神障碍相关的疾病负担相当沉重。然而,在几乎所有国家,用于临床和研究活动的资金在躯体疾病和精神疾病之间仍然存在不平等。

目的

减少这种不平等的一种方法是确保精神卫生政策对此有所反映。我们有兴趣研究英联邦成员国的政策。

方法

我们决定对英联邦的 52 个成员国进行调查,以探讨是否存在精神卫生政策,以及在躯体卫生服务资金和精神卫生服务资金之间是否存在公平性。我们使用世界卫生组织(WHO)数据集和其他相关来源,研究精神卫生政策的存在和内容。

结果

我们发现,只有不到一半的国家制定了精神卫生政策。在许多国家,去机构化并没有被视为优先事项,躯体卫生和精神卫生资金之间也没有公平性。尽管许多国家都建议在躯体卫生和精神卫生保健之间进行整合,但两者之间仍存在明显差距。

结论

显然,在英联邦成员国的资金方面,躯体卫生和精神卫生之间的公平性仍有很长的路要走。这些发现证实了早些时候对精神疾病患者的歧视的观察。我们建议,必须建立机制,在需要的地方促进和支持变革。

相似文献

1
A review of mental health policies from Commonwealth countries.英联邦国家心理健康政策综述
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;64(1):3-8. doi: 10.1177/0020764017745108. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
2
The mental health policy template: domains and elements for mental health policy formulation.心理健康政策模板:心理健康政策制定的领域与要素
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2004 Feb-May;16(1-2):18-23. doi: 10.1080/09540260310001635069.
3
WHO's Assessment Instrument for Mental Health Systems: collecting essential information for policy and service delivery.世界卫生组织心理健康系统评估工具:收集政策与服务提供的基本信息
Psychiatr Serv. 2007 Jun;58(6):816-21. doi: 10.1176/ps.2007.58.6.816.
4
Facilitating deinstitutionalization: a comparative analysis.推动去机构化:一项比较分析。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 1981;27(1):23-32. doi: 10.1177/002076408102700103.
5
Caring for children with mental disorders: do state parity laws increase access to treatment?关爱患有精神障碍的儿童:州平价医疗法是否增加了治疗机会?
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2008 Jun;11(2):57-66.
6
PERSPECTIVES: Accountability for Mental Health: The Australian Experience.观点:心理健康责任:澳大利亚的经验
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2017 Mar 1;20(1):37-54.
7
Call for a change in research funding priorities: the example of mental health in Costa Rica.
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2014 Oct;36(4):266-9.
8
Significance of mental health legislation for successful primary care for mental health and community mental health services: A review.心理健康立法对成功开展初级心理健康护理和社区心理健康服务的意义:一项综述。
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2018 Mar 29;10(1):e1-e4. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v10i1.1429.
9
The International Consortium on Mental Health Policy and Services: objectives, design and project implementation.国际心理健康政策与服务联盟:目标、设计与项目实施
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2004 Feb-May;16(1-2):5-17. doi: 10.1080/09540260310001635050.
10
Child and adolescent mental health policy and plans in Canada: an analytical review.加拿大儿童和青少年心理健康政策和计划:分析性评论。
Can J Psychiatry. 2010 Feb;55(2):100-7. doi: 10.1177/070674371005500206.

引用本文的文献

1
Using evidence in mental health policy agenda-setting in low- and middle-income countries: a conceptual meta-framework from a scoping umbrella review.利用证据制定中低收入国家精神卫生政策议程:来自范围综述的概念元框架。
Health Policy Plan. 2023 Aug 2;38(7):876-893. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czad038.
2
Improving Care for Deinstitutionalized People With Mental Disorders: Experiences of the Use of Knowledge Translation Tools.改善对非机构化精神障碍患者的护理:知识转化工具的使用经验
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 26;12:575108. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.575108. eCollection 2021.
3
Acceleration of Anxiety, Depression, and Suicide: Secondary Effects of Economic Disruption Related to COVID-19.
焦虑、抑郁和自杀加速:与2019冠状病毒病相关的经济混乱的次生影响
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Dec 15;11:592467. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.592467. eCollection 2020.
4
Strengthening mental health systems in low- and middle-income countries: recommendations from the Emerald programme.加强低收入和中等收入国家的心理健康系统:翡翠计划的建议。
BJPsych Open. 2019 Aug 6;5(5):e73. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2018.90.