Suppr超能文献

一项关于不同抗骨质疏松药物治疗绝经后骨质疏松症的短期疗效和不良反应的网络荟萃分析。

A network meta-analysis on the short-term efficacy and adverse events of different anti-osteoporosis drugs for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.

Medical Department, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.

出版信息

J Cell Biochem. 2018 Jun;119(6):4469-4481. doi: 10.1002/jcb.26550. Epub 2018 Feb 28.

Abstract

A network meta-analysis was conducted to compare the short-term efficacy and adverse events of different drugs for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO), providing a more effective treatment for PMO. We initially searched through various databases like PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE from inception till October 2016. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of drugs for the treatment of PMO were included for direct and indirect comparison. A combination of direct and indirect evidence of different inhibitors of anti-diabetic drugs for treatment of PMO were considered for calculating the weighted mean difference (WMD) value or odd ratio (OR) value and to draw surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) curves. Twenty-seven RCTs were ultimately incorporated into this network meta-analysis comprising of 48 200 patients suffering from PMO. The network meta-analysis revealed that compared with placebo, alendronate had better efficacy on improving bone mineral density (BMD) at lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip. Risedronate and raloxifene had relatively lower incidence of new vertebral fractures. The SUCRA analysis showed that alendronate had better efficacy on improving BMD, risedronate could significantly decrease the incidence of fresh fracture and bazedoxifene was relatively safe. The available evidence suggested that alendronate and risedronate might be the superior choices for the treatment of PMO, while bazedoxifene was a comparatively safer option for patients.

摘要

一项网络荟萃分析比较了不同药物治疗绝经后骨质疏松症(PMO)的短期疗效和不良反应,为 PMO 的治疗提供了更有效的方法。我们最初从 2016 年 10 月之前的各种数据库(如 PubMed、Cochrane Library 和 EMBASE)中进行了搜索。纳入了所有治疗 PMO 的药物的随机对照试验(RCT)进行直接和间接比较。综合不同抗糖尿病药物抑制剂治疗 PMO 的直接和间接证据,计算加权均数差值(WMD)值或比值比(OR)值,并绘制累积排序概率曲线(SUCRA)。最终有 27 项 RCT 纳入了这项网络荟萃分析,共有 48200 名患有 PMO 的患者。网络荟萃分析显示,与安慰剂相比,阿仑膦酸钠在改善腰椎、股骨颈和全髋关节的骨密度(BMD)方面效果更好。利塞膦酸钠和雷洛昔芬发生新椎体骨折的几率相对较低。SUCRA 分析显示,阿仑膦酸钠在改善 BMD 方面的疗效更好,利塞膦酸钠可显著降低新发骨折的发生率,而巴多昔芬则相对安全。现有证据表明,阿仑膦酸钠和利塞膦酸钠可能是治疗 PMO 的更佳选择,而巴多昔芬对患者来说是一个相对安全的选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验