Suppr超能文献

氯解磷定用于急性有机磷中毒的效用:一项系统评价与Meta分析

Utility of 2-Pyridine Aldoxime Methyl Chloride (2-PAM) for Acute Organophosphate Poisoning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Blumenberg Adam, Benabbas Roshanak, deSouza Ian S, Conigliaro Alyssa, Paladino Lorenzo, Warman Elliot, Sinert Richard, Wiener Sage W

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Downstate Medical Center, State University of New York, Albany, NY, USA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Kings County Hospital Center, 451 Clarkson Avenue, Brooklyn, NY, 11203, USA.

出版信息

J Med Toxicol. 2018 Mar;14(1):91-98. doi: 10.1007/s13181-017-0636-2. Epub 2017 Dec 11.

Abstract

Organophosphates (OP) account for the majority of pesticide-related unintentional or intentional poisonings in lower- and middle-income countries. The therapeutic role of atropine is well-established for patients with acute OP poisoning. The benefit of adding 2-pyridine aldoxime methyl chloride (2-PAM), however, is controversial. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of available randomized controlled trials (RCT) to compare 2-PAM plus atropine in comparison to atropine alone for acute OP poisoning. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS up to March 2017. The Cochrane review handbook was used to assess the risk of bias. Data were abstracted and risk ratios (RR) were calculated for mortality, rate of intubation, duration of intubation, intermediate syndrome, and complications such as hospital-acquired infections, dysrhythmias, and pulmonary edema. We found five studies comprising 586 patients with varying risks of bias. The risk of death (RR = 1.5, 95% CI 0.9-2.5); intubation (RR = 1.3, 95% CI 1.0-1.6); intermediate syndrome (RR = 1.6, 95% CI 1.0-2.6); complications (RR = 1.2, 95% CI 0.8-1.8); and the duration of intubation (mean difference 0.0, 95% CI - 1.6-1.6) were not significantly different between the atropine plus 2-PAM and atropine alone. Based on our meta-analysis of the available RCTs, 2-PAM was not shown to improve outcomes in patients with acute OP poisoning.

摘要

在低收入和中等收入国家,有机磷酸酯类(OP)农药导致的中毒事件在无意或有意中毒事件中占多数。阿托品对急性OP中毒患者的治疗作用已得到充分证实。然而,添加氯解磷定(2-PAM)的益处存在争议。我们对现有的随机对照试验(RCT)进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以比较2-PAM联合阿托品与单用阿托品治疗急性OP中毒的效果。我们检索了截至2017年3月的PubMed、EMBASE和SCOPUS数据库。采用Cochrane系统评价手册评估偏倚风险。提取数据并计算死亡率、插管率、插管持续时间、中间综合征以及医院获得性感染、心律失常和肺水肿等并发症的风险比(RR)。我们发现了五项研究,共纳入586例偏倚风险各异的患者。死亡风险(RR = 1.5,95%CI 0.9-2.5);插管(RR = 1.3,95%CI 1.0-1.6);中间综合征(RR = 1.6,95%CI 1.0-2.6);并发症(RR = 1.2,95%CI 0.8-1.8);以及插管持续时间(平均差0.0,95%CI -1.6-1.6)在阿托品加2-PAM组和单用阿托品组之间无显著差异。基于我们对现有RCT的荟萃分析,未显示2-PAM能改善急性OP中毒患者的预后。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验