Wen Caiyuzhu, Liu Yafei, Pan Xiaoli, Mao Zhen, Zhou Li, Zhang Hongxing
College of Acupuncture and Orthopedics, Hubei University of CM, Wuhan 430061, China.
the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University.
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2017 May 12;37(5):491-495. doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.2017.05.011.
To compare the clinical therapeutic effects and safety on menopausal symptoms between manual acupuncture (MA) and electroacupuncture (EA).
Fifty patients were randomized into an MA group (25 cases) and an EA group (25 cases). In the MA group, the regular needling technique and pseudo-EA were used at Guanyuan (CV 4), Zigong (EX-CA 1), Tianshu (ST 25) and Sanyinjiao (SP 6). In the EA group, the acupoints were the same as the MA group and stimulated with EA and pseudo-MA (no manipulation applied in treatment), with disperse-dense wave, 10 Hz/50 Hz, 0.5 to 1.0 mA. In the two groups, the needles were retained for 30 min. The treatment was given once every two days, three times a week, totally for 8 consecutive weeks. The results of the menopause rating scale (MRS), the menopause-specific quality of life (MENQOL), the self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) and the self-rating depression scale (SDS), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH) and estradiol (E) as well as adverse reactions were evaluated before treatment, in 4 and 8 weeks of treatment separately.
Compared with those before treatment, the scores of MRS, MENQOL, SAS and SDS were all reduced in the 4 and 8 weeks of treatment in the two groups (all <0.05). The results in 8 weeks of treatment were lower than those in 4 weeks of treatment in the two groups (all <0.05). The differen-ces were not significant statistically between the two groups (all >0.05). Compared with those before treatment, the levels of FSH and LH reduced and E increased after treatment in the two groups, without significant differences (all >0.05). The differences were not significant statistically between the two groups (all >0.05). The severe adverse reactions were not found in the treatment of the two groups.
Both manual acupuncture and electroacupuncture relieve the symptoms of depression and anxiety in menopausal syndrome,improve the living quality and do not induce apparent changes in serological sex hormones in the patients.
比较手针(MA)与电针(EA)治疗更年期症状的临床疗效及安全性。
将50例患者随机分为MA组(25例)和EA组(25例)。MA组采用常规针刺手法及假电针,针刺关元(CV 4)、子宫(EX-CA 1)、天枢(ST 25)和三阴交(SP 6)。EA组穴位与MA组相同,采用电针及假手针(治疗时不进行手法操作),疏密波,10Hz/50Hz,0.5至1.0mA。两组均留针30分钟。治疗每两天进行1次,每周3次,连续8周。分别在治疗前、治疗4周和8周时评估更年期评定量表(MRS)、更年期特异性生活质量(MENQOL)、自评焦虑量表(SAS)和自评抑郁量表(SDS)、促卵泡生成素(FSH)、促黄体生成素(LH)和雌二醇(E)以及不良反应。
与治疗前相比,两组治疗4周和8周时MRS、MENQOL、SAS和SDS评分均降低(均P<0.05)。两组治疗8周时的结果低于治疗4周时(均P<0.05)。两组间差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。与治疗前相比,两组治疗后FSH和LH水平降低,E水平升高,差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。两组间差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。两组治疗中均未发现严重不良反应。
手针和电针均可缓解更年期综合征患者的抑郁和焦虑症状,提高生活质量,且患者血清性激素无明显变化。