Suppr超能文献

电针对焦虑症的疗效:随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析

Effectiveness of electroacupuncture on anxiety: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Hong Wan Ki, Kim Yeon Ji, Lee Ye Rim, Jeong Hye In, Kim Kyeong Han, Ko Seong-Gyu

机构信息

College of Korean Medicine, Woosuk University, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.

Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Dec 19;14:1196177. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1196177. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness of electroacupuncture (EA) for patients with anxiety. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the treatment of anxiety by EA up to November 2022 were searched and collected from nine databases. Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA), self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), and adverse reactions were used as outcome indicators. The quality of relevant articles was evaluated using the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool. The quality of evidence for each outcome was classified as "low risk," "unclear risk," or "high risk." RevMan 5.0 was used for data analysis. A total of 633 articles were identified from nine electronic databases; 37 RCTs were included, which measured anxiety changes by using EA alone compared to the control group. For the main outcome, EA significantly reduced the HAMA score [Mean difference (MD):-1.13 (95% CI:-2.55-0.29), I:80%], and the quality of evidence was moderate. EA significantly reduced the SAS score (MD:-3.47 (95% CI,-6.57--0.36), I:88%), and the quality of evidence was moderate. Our meta-analysis shows that EA reduces HAMA and SAS. This study suggests that EA can relieve anxiety. For various uses, additional research is needed on its effect when combined with other treatments.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=345658, identifier (CRD42022345658).

摘要

未标注

本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在全面评估电针治疗焦虑症患者的有效性。从九个数据库中检索并收集了截至2022年11月关于电针治疗焦虑症的随机对照试验(RCT)。采用汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)、自评焦虑量表(SAS)和不良反应作为结局指标。使用Cochrane协作网的偏倚风险工具评估相关文章的质量。将每个结局的证据质量分类为“低风险”、“风险不明确”或“高风险”。使用RevMan 5.0进行数据分析。从九个电子数据库中总共识别出633篇文章;纳入了37项RCT,这些研究测量了单独使用电针与对照组相比焦虑的变化。对于主要结局,电针显著降低了HAMA评分[平均差(MD):-1.13(95%CI:-2.55 - 0.29),I²:80%],证据质量为中等。电针显著降低了SAS评分(MD:-3.47(95%CI,-6.57 - -0.36),I²:88%),证据质量为中等。我们的荟萃分析表明,电针降低了HAMA和SAS评分。本研究表明,电针可缓解焦虑。对于各种用途,需要进一步研究其与其他治疗联合使用时的效果。

系统评价注册

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=345658,标识符(CRD42022345658)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed49/10764156/f749d020dafb/fpsyg-14-1196177-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验