• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左心室辅助装置患者深部导线感染的导线出口部位重新定位的长期成功经验。

Long-Term Success With Driveline Exit Site Relocation for Deep Driveline Infection in Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients.

作者信息

Balsam Leora B, Jacoby Adam, Louie Eddie, Levine Jamie P

出版信息

Innovations (Phila). 2017 Nov/Dec;12(6):440-445. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000433.

DOI:10.1097/IMI.0000000000000433
PMID:29232297
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Driveline infection is a common complication of durable left ventricular assist device support. The majority involve the driveline exit site and can be treated with antibiotics and local wound care. Less frequently, these infections extend into deeper tissues and surgical debridement is necessary. Few studies have described the surgical strategy for treatment of deep driveline infection or have reported long-term outcomes. With a growing population of patients being implanted as destination therapy, there is an obvious need to evaluate and optimize treatment for complex driveline infections.

METHODS

Outcomes of patients undergoing durable left ventricular assist device implantation at a single center between 2011 and 2017 were reviewed retrospectively. Data including occurrence of driveline infection, pathogen, time to driveline infection, and treatment strategy were abstracted from the electronic medical record.

RESULTS

Driveline infection occurred in 10 (16.4%) of 61 patients at a median of 362 days (Q1 = 99, Q3 = 694) after primary left ventricular assist device implantation. Three (30.0%) of 10 driveline infections were categorized as deep and did not resolve with intravenous antibiotic therapy. In these cases, a multistage approach that included initial debridement and exteriorization of the infected driveline, followed by delayed surgical relocation of the driveline in a clean vascularized soft tissue bed, was used. Long-term device salvage was achieved in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

An aggressive surgical strategy, including debridement and formal relocation of the driveline exit site, can result in long-term device salvage after deep driveline infection. This approach is a less invasive alternative to device exchange for refractory driveline infections.

摘要

目的

驱动线感染是长期左心室辅助装置支持常见的并发症。大多数感染累及驱动线出口部位,可通过抗生素和局部伤口护理进行治疗。较少见的情况是,这些感染会蔓延至更深层组织,需要进行手术清创。很少有研究描述深部驱动线感染的手术治疗策略或报告长期预后。随着作为终末期治疗而植入装置的患者数量不断增加,显然需要评估和优化对复杂驱动线感染的治疗。

方法

回顾性分析2011年至2017年在单一中心接受长期左心室辅助装置植入患者的预后。从电子病历中提取包括驱动线感染的发生情况、病原体、发生驱动线感染的时间以及治疗策略等数据。

结果

61例患者中有10例(16.4%)发生驱动线感染,初次左心室辅助装置植入后中位时间为362天(第一四分位数 = 99,第三四分位数 = 694)。10例驱动线感染中有3例(30.0%)被归类为深部感染,静脉使用抗生素治疗无效。在这些病例中,采用了多阶段方法,包括最初对感染的驱动线进行清创和外置,随后在清洁的血管化软组织床中延迟进行驱动线的手术重新安置。所有病例均实现了长期装置挽救。

结论

积极的手术策略,包括对驱动线出口部位进行清创和正式重新安置,可在深部驱动线感染后实现长期装置挽救。对于难治性驱动线感染,这种方法是一种侵入性较小的装置更换替代方案。

相似文献

1
Long-Term Success With Driveline Exit Site Relocation for Deep Driveline Infection in Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients.左心室辅助装置患者深部导线感染的导线出口部位重新定位的长期成功经验。
Innovations (Phila). 2017 Nov/Dec;12(6):440-445. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000433.
2
Treatment of ventricular assist device driveline infection with vacuum-assisted closure system.采用负压封闭引流系统治疗心室辅助装置驱动线感染
Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Oct;80(4):1493-5. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.03.043.
3
Low Incidence of Pump-Related Infections in Jarvik 2000 Ventricular Assist Device Recipients with a Subcostal Driveline Exit Site.采用肋下驱动线出口部位的Jarvik 2000心室辅助装置受者中与泵相关感染的发生率较低。
Tex Heart Inst J. 2019 Jun 1;46(3):179-182. doi: 10.14503/THIJ-15-5708. eCollection 2019 Jun.
4
Management of Rapidly Ascending Driveline Tunnel Infection.快速上升的传动系统隧道感染的管理
J Card Surg. 2015 Nov;30(11):853-5. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12655. Epub 2015 Oct 7.
5
Minimum inhibitory concentration changes in relapsed left ventricular assist device driveline infections.复发性左心室辅助装置驱动线感染中最低抑菌浓度的变化
Int J Artif Organs. 2020 Jul;43(7):494-499. doi: 10.1177/0391398819900188. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
6
Special Treatment and Wound Care of the Driveline Exit Site after Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.左心室辅助装置植入术后驱动线出口部位的特殊处理与伤口护理
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Dec;63(8):670-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1554961. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
7
A simple device to secure ventricular assist device driveline and prevent exit-site infection.一种用于固定心室辅助装置驱动线并预防出口部位感染的简易装置。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Apr;18(4):415-7. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt549. Epub 2014 Jan 14.
8
Mycobacterium abscessus Left Ventricle Assist Device Driveline Infections: An Emerging Pathogen?脓肿分枝杆菌左心室辅助装置驱动线感染:一种新出现的病原体?
Transpl Infect Dis. 2018 Oct;20(5):e12957. doi: 10.1111/tid.12957. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
9
Reduction of INCOR® driveline infection rate with silicone at the driveline exit site.在动力传输线出口部位使用硅胶降低INCOR®动力传输线感染率。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017 Feb 1;24(2):222-228. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw336.
10
Surgical management of driveline infections in patients with left ventricular assist devices.左心室辅助装置患者驱动线感染的外科治疗
J Card Surg. 2016 Dec;31(12):765-771. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12860. Epub 2016 Oct 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Threatened Ventricular Assist Devices: Meta-analysis of Negative Pressure Therapy and Flap Reconstruction Outcomes.受威胁的心室辅助装置:负压治疗与皮瓣重建结果的荟萃分析
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Oct 24;10(10):e4627. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004627. eCollection 2022 Oct.
2
Prevalence and management of driveline infections in mechanical circulatory support - a single center analysis.机械循环支持装置中电源线感染的发生率和处理-单中心分析。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Aug 3;16(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01589-6.