• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Low Incidence of Pump-Related Infections in Jarvik 2000 Ventricular Assist Device Recipients with a Subcostal Driveline Exit Site.采用肋下驱动线出口部位的Jarvik 2000心室辅助装置受者中与泵相关感染的发生率较低。
Tex Heart Inst J. 2019 Jun 1;46(3):179-182. doi: 10.14503/THIJ-15-5708. eCollection 2019 Jun.
2
Left ventricle assist devices and driveline's infection incidence: a single-centre experience.左心室辅助装置及驱动线感染发生率:单中心经验
J Artif Organs. 2018 Mar;21(1):52-60. doi: 10.1007/s10047-017-0997-y. Epub 2017 Oct 7.
3
The Jarvik 2000 is associated with less infections than the HeartMate left ventricular assist device.与HeartMate左心室辅助装置相比,Jarvik 2000引发的感染较少。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003 May;23(5):748-54; discussion 754-5. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(03)00073-3.
4
A simple device to secure ventricular assist device driveline and prevent exit-site infection.一种用于固定心室辅助装置驱动线并预防出口部位感染的简易装置。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Apr;18(4):415-7. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt549. Epub 2014 Jan 14.
5
Multidrug-Resistant Organism Infections in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices.左心室辅助装置患者的多重耐药菌感染
Tex Heart Inst J. 2015 Dec 1;42(6):522-7. doi: 10.14503/THIJ-14-4612. eCollection 2015 Dec.
6
Late outcomes of subcostal exchange of the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device: a word of caution.心泰华 II 左心室辅助装置经肋缘下交换的远期结果:警告一言。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Oct 1;54(4):652-656. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy159.
7
Long-Term Success With Driveline Exit Site Relocation for Deep Driveline Infection in Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients.左心室辅助装置患者深部导线感染的导线出口部位重新定位的长期成功经验。
Innovations (Phila). 2017 Nov/Dec;12(6):440-445. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000433.
8
Reduction of INCOR® driveline infection rate with silicone at the driveline exit site.在动力传输线出口部位使用硅胶降低INCOR®动力传输线感染率。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017 Feb 1;24(2):222-228. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw336.
9
Late-onset driveline infections: the Achilles' heel of prolonged left ventricular assist device support.迟发性传动系统感染:长期左心室辅助装置支持的致命弱点。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Aug;84(2):515-20. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.03.085.
10
Ventricular assist device driveline infection: treatment with platelet-rich plasma.心室辅助装置导线感染:富血小板血浆治疗。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Aug;96(2):e37-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.01.093.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Technological Analysis of Durability and Reliability in Axial-Flow Pump Left Ventricular Assist Devices (LVADs).轴流泵式左心室辅助装置(LVADs)耐久性和可靠性的比较技术分析
Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2025 Apr 30. doi: 10.1007/s13239-025-00778-x.

本文引用的文献

1
The Jarvik-2000 ventricular assist device implantation: how we do it.贾维克-2000 心室辅助装置植入术:我们的操作方法。
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Sep;3(5):525-31. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2014.09.09.
2
Clinical management for complications related to implantable LVAD use.与植入式左心室辅助装置使用相关并发症的临床管理。
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Jan;63(1):1-7. doi: 10.1007/s11748-014-0480-0. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
3
Evolution and impact of drive-line infection in a large cohort of continuous-flow ventricular assist device recipients.连续血流心室辅助装置受者中驱动线感染的演变和影响。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014 Nov;33(11):1164-72. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2014.05.011. Epub 2014 Jun 5.
4
Sixth INTERMACS annual report: a 10,000-patient database.国际机械循环辅助装置注册研究(INTERMACS)第六年度报告:一个包含10000名患者的数据库。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014 Jun;33(6):555-64. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2014.04.010. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
5
Percutaneous lead dysfunction in the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device.HeartMate II 左心室辅助装置中的经皮导联功能障碍。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Apr;97(4):1373-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.11.039. Epub 2014 Feb 1.
6
Hemolysis: a harbinger of adverse outcome after left ventricular assist device implant.溶血:左心室辅助装置植入后不良结局的先兆。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014 Jan;33(1):35-43. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2013.08.021. Epub 2013 Nov 28.
7
Pre-operative risk factors of bleeding and stroke during left ventricular assist device support: an analysis of more than 900 HeartMate II outpatients.左心室辅助装置支持期间出血和中风的术前风险因素:超过 900 例 HeartMate II 门诊患者的分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Mar 11;63(9):880-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.1656. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
8
Clinical manifestations and management of left ventricular assist device-associated infections.左心室辅助装置相关感染的临床表现和处理。
Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Nov;57(10):1438-48. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit536. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
9
Continuous-flow devices and percutaneous site infections: clinical outcomes.连续流装置与经皮部位感染:临床结局。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2012 Nov;31(11):1151-7. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2012.05.004. Epub 2012 Jul 4.
10
Outcomes in advanced heart failure patients with left ventricular assist devices for destination therapy.用于终末期心力衰竭的左心室辅助装置治疗的晚期心力衰竭患者的结局。
Circ Heart Fail. 2012 Mar 1;5(2):241-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.111.963991. Epub 2012 Jan 26.

采用肋下驱动线出口部位的Jarvik 2000心室辅助装置受者中与泵相关感染的发生率较低。

Low Incidence of Pump-Related Infections in Jarvik 2000 Ventricular Assist Device Recipients with a Subcostal Driveline Exit Site.

作者信息

Letsou George V, Anand Jatin, Ogburn Erinn, Shah Rohan M, Ganapathy Anand V, Cohn William E, Loor Gabriel, Frazier O H

出版信息

Tex Heart Inst J. 2019 Jun 1;46(3):179-182. doi: 10.14503/THIJ-15-5708. eCollection 2019 Jun.

DOI:10.14503/THIJ-15-5708
PMID:31708699
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6827473/
Abstract

Driveline infection has been a persistent problem with mechanical cardiac assist devices. The reported incidence of infection has been low in patients who receive a Jarvik 2000 continuous-flow left ventricular assist device when a skull-pedestal driveline exit site is used. We evaluated whether this is also true when a subcostal driveline exit site is used. We reviewed baseline demographic variables, postimplantation vital signs, laboratory values, and culture results in patients who underwent Jarvik 2000 implantation at our center from April 2000 through October 2009, including follow-up through June 2014. All patients had a subcostal driveline exit site. We defined device-related infection as a positive blood or wound culture associated with a medical or surgical device intervention. Event and time-to-event rates were calculated. Eighty-one patients received 89 Jarvik 2000 devices, all as bridges to transplantation. The median support duration was 69 days (interquartile range, 27-153 d; range, 2-2,249 d). Five superficial driveline infections and one incision-site infection occurred (0.002 events per patient-year of support). The median time from pump implantation to onset of driveline infection was 30 days; the incision-related infection occurred at 44 days. The Jarvik 2000 has a low incidence of infection when implanted with use of a subcostal driveline exit site. The incidence of pump infections is particularly low. Using a subcostal driveline exit site may be as effective in preventing infections as using a skull-pedestal driveline exit site. We detail our findings in this report.

摘要

对于机械心脏辅助装置而言,经皮导线感染一直是个棘手的问题。有报道称,采用颅骨基座经皮导线出口部位的患者接受Jarvik 2000连续流左心室辅助装置时,感染发生率较低。我们评估了采用肋下经皮导线出口部位时情况是否依然如此。我们回顾了2000年4月至2009年10月在我们中心接受Jarvik 2000植入的患者的基线人口统计学变量、植入后的生命体征、实验室检查值及培养结果,随访至2014年6月。所有患者均采用肋下经皮导线出口部位。我们将与医疗或外科装置干预相关的血培养或伤口培养阳性定义为装置相关感染。计算了事件发生率和事件发生时间率。81例患者接受了89台Jarvik 2000装置,均作为移植过渡治疗。中位支持时间为69天(四分位间距,27 - 153天;范围,2 - 2249天)。发生了5例表浅经皮导线感染和1例切口部位感染(每患者年支持时间的事件发生率为0.002)。从泵植入到经皮导线感染发生的中位时间为30天;切口相关感染发生在44天。采用肋下经皮导线出口部位植入时,Jarvik 2000感染发生率较低。泵感染的发生率尤其低。采用肋下经皮导线出口部位预防感染可能与采用颅骨基座经皮导线出口部位同样有效。我们在本报告中详细阐述了我们的研究结果。