Walsh University (E.R.T., K.B.G., A.M.S., R.S.P.), Physical Therapy Program, School of Behavioral and Health Sciences, North Canton, Ohio; and University of Mississippi Medical Center (J.C.R.), Jackson, Mississippi.
J Neurol Phys Ther. 2018 Jan;42(1):2-11. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000211.
To identify the association between outcome measure score and discharge destination in adults following acute or subacute stroke in the United States.
A systematic literature search was performed in 3 databases using the PRISMA guidelines. Cohort studies were selected that included patients with acute or subacute stroke, which explored the relationship between scores on outcome measures and discharge destination. Four meta-analyses were performed.
Nine articles met the inclusion criteria for systematic review and 5 for the series of meta-analyses. For every 1-point increase on the Functional Independence Measure (FIM), a patient is approximately 1.08 times more likely to be discharged home than to institutionalized care (odds ratio [OR] = 1.079; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.056- 1.102). Patients with stroke who performed above-average (FIM ≥80; NIH Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score ≤5; etc) are 12 times (OR = 12.08; 95% CI, 3.550-41.07) more likely to discharge home. Patients who perform poorly (FIM ≤39; NIHSS score ≥14), experience discharge to institutionalized care 3.4 times (OR = 3.385; 95% CI, 2.591-4.422) more likely than home, with skilled nursing facility admission more likely than inpatient rehabilitation facility. Patients who perform average (FIM = 40-79; NIHSS score = 6-13) are 1.9 times (OR = 1.879; 95% CI, 1.227-2.877) more likely to be discharged to institutionalized care.
Outcome measure scores are strong predictors of discharge destination among patients with stroke and provide an objective means of early discharge planning. Discharge decisions should be made with consideration for patient-specific biopsychosocial factors that may supersede isolated results of the outcome measures, and further research needs to assess the success of the location that a patient is referred at discharge.Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A194).
在美国,识别急性或亚急性脑卒中成人的结局测量评分与出院去向之间的关联。
根据 PRISMA 指南,在 3 个数据库中进行了系统文献检索。选择包括急性或亚急性脑卒中患者的队列研究,这些研究探索了结局测量评分与出院去向之间的关系。进行了 4 项荟萃分析。
有 9 篇文章符合系统综述的纳入标准,5 篇文章符合系列荟萃分析的纳入标准。功能独立性测量(FIM)每增加 1 分,患者出院回家的可能性就增加约 1.08 倍(优势比[OR] = 1.079;95%置信区间[CI],1.056-1.102)。FIM 评分高于平均水平(≥80;NIHSS 评分≤5;等)的脑卒中患者出院回家的可能性是 12 倍(OR = 12.08;95%CI,3.550-41.07)。FIM 评分较低(≤39;NIHSS 评分≥14)的患者出院至机构护理的可能性是回家的 3.4 倍(OR = 3.385;95%CI,2.591-4.422),更有可能入住护理院,而不是住院康复机构。FIM 评分处于中等水平(40-79;NIHSS 评分=6-13)的患者出院至机构护理的可能性是回家的 1.9 倍(OR = 1.879;95%CI,1.227-2.877)。
结局测量评分是脑卒中患者出院去向的有力预测指标,为早期出院计划提供了客观手段。出院决策应考虑患者特定的生物心理社会因素,这些因素可能超过结局测量的孤立结果,需要进一步研究来评估患者出院时所转往地点的成功情况。(见视频,补充数字内容 1,http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A194)