Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Kresge 7th Floor, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Kresge 7th Floor, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Jan;197:127-135. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.12.003. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
Several studies have documented a protective association between social trust and mental and physical health, but gaps in knowledge remain. Debates regarding the contextual versus individual nature of social trust are ongoing; research from low- and middle-income countries is lacking, and study designs have been limited for causal inference. To address these gaps, we examined the association between social trust and depressive symptoms using three waves of the National Income Dynamics Study, a longitudinal South African survey. We used individual fixed-effects models to assess the association between changes in scores on the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale Short Form (CES-D-10) and in individual-level and district-level personalized and generalized trust among 15,670 individuals completing at least two waves of the NIDS adult questionnaire. High individual-level generalized trust was unexpectedly associated with increased depressive symptoms scores while district generalized trust did not show an association. We also found a cross-level interaction between individual and district-level personalized trust. High individual trust was associated with increased depressive symptoms scores when district trust was low; however, as district-level trust increased, higher individual trust was associated with reduced depressive symptoms. Our unexpected results suggest that trust may not always be beneficial for depressive symptoms, but rather, that its effects may depend on context. In the South African setting where social trust is low, being very likely to trust may be associated with worse depressive symptoms in some circumstances.
已有多项研究记录了社会信任与身心健康之间存在保护关联,但仍存在知识空白。关于社会信任的情境性与个体性的争论仍在继续;来自中低收入国家的研究匮乏,且因果推断的研究设计也受到了限制。为了解决这些差距,我们使用南非纵向调查“国家收入动态研究”的三波数据,考察了社会信任与抑郁症状之间的关联。我们使用个体固定效应模型来评估在至少完成两轮 NIDS 成人问卷的 15670 名个体中,中心流行病学研究抑郁量表短式(CES-D-10)得分变化与个体层面和地区层面个性化信任和普遍化信任之间的关联。令人意外的是,个体层面的普遍化信任水平较高与抑郁症状得分增加有关,而地区层面的普遍化信任则没有关联。我们还发现了个体层面和地区层面个性化信任之间的跨层次交互作用。当地区信任水平较低时,个体信任水平较高与抑郁症状得分增加有关;然而,随着地区层面信任度的提高,个体信任水平较高与抑郁症状得分降低有关。我们意想不到的结果表明,信任并不总是对抑郁症状有益,而是其影响可能取决于具体情境。在南非这种社会信任度较低的环境下,在某些情况下,非常信任他人可能与更严重的抑郁症状有关。