• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“双倍食品券计划”对补充营养援助计划(SNAP)受益人的水果和蔬菜购买行为的影响。

Double Up Food Bucks program effects on SNAP recipients' fruit and vegetable purchases.

作者信息

Steele-Adjognon Marie, Weatherspoon Dave

机构信息

Agriculitural, Food and Resource Economics Department, Michigan State University, 466 W Circle Drive, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2017 Dec 12;17(1):946. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4942-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-017-4942-z
PMID:29233128
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5727931/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To encourage the consumption of more fresh fruits and vegetables, the 2014 United Sates Farm Bill allocated funds to the Double Up Food Bucks Program. This program provided Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program beneficiaries who spent $10 on fresh fruits and vegetables, in one transaction, with a $10 gift card exclusively for Michigan grown fresh fruits and vegetables. This study analyzes how fruit and vegetable expenditures, expenditure shares, variety and purchase decisions were affected by the initiation and conclusion, as well as any persistent effects of the program.

METHODS

Changes in fruit and vegetable purchase behaviors due to Double Up Food Bucks in a supermarket serving a low-income, predominantly Hispanic community in Detroit, Michigan were evaluated using a difference in difference fixed effects estimation strategy.

RESULTS

We find that the Double Up Food Bucks program increased vegetable expenditures, fruit and vegetable expenditure shares, and variety of fruits and vegetables purchased but the effects were modest and not sustainable without the financial incentive. Fruit expenditures and the fruit and vegetable purchase decision were unaffected by the program.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides valuable insight on how a nutrition program influences a low-income, urban, Hispanic community's fruit and vegetable purchase behavior. Policy recommendations include either removing or lowering the purchase hurdle for incentive eligibility and dropping the Michigan grown requirement to better align with the customers' preferences for fresh fruits and vegetables.

摘要

背景

为鼓励人们更多地食用新鲜水果和蔬菜,2014年美国农业法案向“双倍食品券计划”拨款。该计划为使用补充营养援助计划的受益者提供福利,他们在一次交易中花费10美元购买新鲜水果和蔬菜,即可获得一张价值10美元的礼品卡,该礼品卡专门用于购买密歇根州种植的新鲜水果和蔬菜。本研究分析了该计划的启动、结束以及任何持续性影响对水果和蔬菜支出、支出份额、品种和购买决策的影响。

方法

采用双重差分固定效应估计策略,评估了密歇根州底特律一个以低收入、西班牙裔为主的社区的超市中,“双倍食品券计划”对水果和蔬菜购买行为的影响。

结果

我们发现,“双倍食品券计划”增加了蔬菜支出、水果和蔬菜支出份额以及购买的水果和蔬菜品种,但如果没有经济激励,这些影响是适度的且不可持续。水果支出以及水果和蔬菜购买决策不受该计划影响。

结论

本研究为一项营养计划如何影响低收入城市西班牙裔社区的水果和蔬菜购买行为提供了有价值的见解。政策建议包括要么取消或降低激励资格的购买门槛,要么取消密歇根州种植的要求,以更好地符合消费者对新鲜水果和蔬菜的偏好。

相似文献

1
Double Up Food Bucks program effects on SNAP recipients' fruit and vegetable purchases.“双倍食品券计划”对补充营养援助计划(SNAP)受益人的水果和蔬菜购买行为的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Dec 12;17(1):946. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4942-z.
2
Association of a Fruit and Vegetable Subsidy Program With Food Purchases by Individuals With Low Income in the US.美国低收入个体的蔬果补贴计划与食品购买之间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2120377. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.20377.
3
Incentivizing fruit and vegetable purchases among participants in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children.激励妇女、婴儿和儿童特别补充营养计划的参与者购买水果和蔬菜。
Public Health Nutr. 2015 Jan;18(1):33-41. doi: 10.1017/S1368980014000512. Epub 2014 May 9.
4
Improving fruit and vegetable consumption among low-income customers at farmers markets: Philly Food Bucks, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 2011.提高农贸市场低收入顾客的水果和蔬菜消费:费城食品券,宾夕法尼亚州费城,2011 年。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2013 Oct 3;10:E166. doi: 10.5888/pcd10.120356.
5
A Supermarket Double-Dollar Incentive Program Increases Purchases of Fresh Fruits and Vegetables Among Low-Income Families With Children: The Healthy Double Study.超级市场双倍优惠激励计划增加有孩子的低收入家庭购买新鲜水果和蔬菜:健康双研究。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2018 Mar;50(3):217-228.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2017.09.013. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
6
Fruit and Vegetable Purchasing Patterns and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Participation: Findings From a Nationally Representative Survey.水果和蔬菜购买模式与补充营养援助计划参与情况:一项全国代表性调查的结果。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2020 Oct;120(10):1633-1642. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2020.05.016. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
7
Qualitative Study on Participant Perceptions of a Supermarket Fruit and Vegetable Incentive Program.关于参与者对超市水果和蔬菜激励计划看法的定性研究。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2021 Aug;121(8):1497-1506. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2020.10.010. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
8
The impact of financial incentives on SNAP transactions at mobile produce markets.金融激励对移动农产品市场中 SNAP 交易的影响。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Feb 8;18(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01093-z.
9
Fruit and Vegetable Incentive Programs for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Participants: A Scoping Review of Program Structure.果蔬激励计划对补充营养援助计划(SNAP)参与者的影响:计划结构的范围综述。
Nutrients. 2020 Jun 4;12(6):1676. doi: 10.3390/nu12061676.
10
Nationwide expansion of a financial incentive program on fruit and vegetable purchases among Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participants: A cost-effectiveness analysis.全国范围内针对补充营养援助计划参与者的果蔬购买财政激励计划扩展:一项成本效益分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Dec;147:80-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.09.032. Epub 2015 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Healthy Food Benefit Programs, Fruit and Vegetable Consumption, and Food Security.健康食品福利计划、水果和蔬菜消费与粮食安全。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2527601. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.27601.
2
"The Dollar Store Got It Going On": Understanding Food Shopping Patterns and Policy Preferences among Dollar Store Shoppers with Low Incomes.“一元店生意兴隆”:了解低收入一元店购物者的食品购买模式和政策偏好
Curr Dev Nutr. 2024 Sep 13;8(10):104457. doi: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.104457. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
What does it take for healthy food retail programmes to be successful? Lessons learned in New York City.健康食品零售项目成功需要什么?从纽约市吸取的经验教训。
Public Health Nutr. 2024 Oct 3;27(1):e188. doi: 10.1017/S1368980024001368.
4
Impact of a financial incentive scheme on purchase of fruits and vegetables from unorganised retailers in rural India: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.一项财政激励计划对印度农村非正规零售商处果蔬购买行为的影响:一项整群随机对照试验
Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2023 Feb 1;12:100140. doi: 10.1016/j.lansea.2022.100140. eCollection 2023 May.
5
Grocery Purchase Changes Were Associated With A North Carolina COVID-19 Food Assistance Incentive Program.杂货购买变化与北卡罗来纳州 COVID-19 食品援助激励计划有关。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Nov;41(11):1616-1625. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00902.
6
Evaluation of Economic and Health Outcomes Associated With Food Taxes and Subsidies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.评估与食品税和补贴相关的经济和健康结果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2214371. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.14371.
7
Understanding SNAP Recipient Characteristics to Guide Equitable Expansion of Nutrition Incentive Programs in Diverse Food Retail Settings.了解 SNAP 受助人的特征,以指导在不同的食品零售环境中公平扩大营养激励计划。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 20;19(9):4977. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19094977.
8
A Preliminary Evaluation of Virginia Fresh Match: Impacts and Demographic Considerations for Future Fruit and Vegetable Incentive Programs.弗吉尼亚新鲜匹配初步评估:对未来水果和蔬菜激励计划的影响和人口统计考虑。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 5;19(7):4367. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074367.
9
Participant characteristics and dietary correlates of SNAP and other assistance programs among families with children from racially and ethnically diverse households.种族和民族多样化家庭中儿童家庭的参与者特征和 SNAP 及其他援助计划的饮食相关性。
Appetite. 2022 Jul 1;174:106015. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2022.106015. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
10
Increasing Healthy Food Access for Low-Income Communities: Protocol of the Healthy Community Stores Case Study Project.增加低收入社区的健康食品获取途径:健康社区商店案例研究项目方案。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 8;19(2):690. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020690.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing Preliminary Impact of the North Carolina Community Transformation Grant Project Farmers' Market Initiatives Among Rural Residents.评估北卡罗来纳州社区转型拨款项目农贸市场倡议对农村居民的初步影响。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2016 May;48(5):343-349.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2016.03.001.
2
Economic assessment of nutritional recommendations.营养建议的经济评估
J Health Econ. 2015 Jan;39:188-210. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2014.09.002. Epub 2014 Oct 2.
3
Income and race/ethnicity influence dietary fiber intake and vegetable consumption.收入以及种族/民族会影响膳食纤维摄入量和蔬菜消费量。
Nutr Res. 2014 Oct;34(10):844-50. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2014.08.016. Epub 2014 Sep 3.
4
Impact of a Rewards-Based Incentive Program on Promoting Fruit and Vegetable Purchases.基于奖励的激励计划对促进果蔬购买的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2015 Jan;105(1):166-172. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301752.
5
Process evaluation of a food marketing and environmental change intervention in Tiendas that serve Latino immigrants in North Carolina.对北卡罗来纳州为拉丁裔移民服务的杂货店中食品营销与环境变化干预措施的过程评估。
Health Promot Pract. 2014 Nov;15(6):839-48. doi: 10.1177/1524839913520546. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
6
Improving fruit and vegetable consumption among low-income customers at farmers markets: Philly Food Bucks, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 2011.提高农贸市场低收入顾客的水果和蔬菜消费:费城食品券,宾夕法尼亚州费城,2011 年。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2013 Oct 3;10:E166. doi: 10.5888/pcd10.120356.
7
A cash-back rebate program for healthy food purchases in South Africa: results from scanner data.南非健康食品购买现金返利计划:扫描器数据结果。
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Jun;44(6):567-72. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.02.011.
8
Supermarket discounts of low-energy density foods: effects on purchasing, food intake, and body weight.超市低价低能量密度食品折扣:对购买、食物摄入和体重的影响。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013 Dec;21(12):E542-8. doi: 10.1002/oby.20484. Epub 2013 Jul 5.
9
Effectiveness of subsidies in promoting healthy food purchases and consumption: a review of field experiments.补贴在促进健康食品购买和消费方面的有效性:实地实验综述。
Public Health Nutr. 2013 Jul;16(7):1215-28. doi: 10.1017/S1368980012004715. Epub 2012 Nov 5.
10
Providing additional money to food-insecure households and its effect on food expenditure: a randomized controlled trial.为食品无保障家庭提供额外资金及其对食品支出的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Public Health Nutr. 2013 Aug;16(8):1507-15. doi: 10.1017/S1368980012003680. Epub 2012 Aug 9.