• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

了解 SNAP 受助人的特征,以指导在不同的食品零售环境中公平扩大营养激励计划。

Understanding SNAP Recipient Characteristics to Guide Equitable Expansion of Nutrition Incentive Programs in Diverse Food Retail Settings.

机构信息

Mary Ann Swetland Center for Environmental Health Research, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.

Produce Perks Midwest, Cincinnati, OH 45241, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 20;19(9):4977. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19094977.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19094977
PMID:35564371
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9101614/
Abstract

Structural barriers, such as food costs, reduce access to healthy foods for populations with limited income, including those benefitting from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Nutrition incentive programs seek to address this barrier. Evaluations of SNAP-based incentive programming often focus on one setting (i.e., either farmers’ markets or grocery stores). We examined use patterns, characteristics, and preferences among 253 SNAP consumers with access to incentive programming at both a farmers’ market and a grocery store located within five miles of their home. Cross-sectional survey data were collected in 2019 in two Ohio cities. Despite geographic access, 45% of those surveyed were not using the incentive program; most non-users (80.5%) were unaware of the program. Program users compared to non-users had higher household incomes (p < 0.001) and knew more people using the program (p < 0.001). Grocery stores were the most common setting of use (59%); 29% used at farmers’ markets; 11% used in both settings. User characteristics varied by store setting based on demographics, program experience, fruit and vegetable purchasing and consumption patterns, and social dynamics related to use. Our findings support comprehensive awareness-raising efforts and tailored implementation of incentive programming that attends to diverse segments of SNAP consumers to promote equity in program reach.

摘要

结构性障碍,如食品成本,限制了收入有限的人群获得健康食品的机会,包括那些受益于补充营养援助计划(SNAP)的人群。营养激励计划旨在解决这一障碍。基于 SNAP 的激励计划的评估通常集中在一个环境(即农贸市场或杂货店)。我们研究了 253 名 SNAP 消费者的使用模式、特征和偏好,这些消费者在家中五英里范围内可以获得激励计划,包括农贸市场和杂货店。2019 年在俄亥俄州的两个城市收集了横断面调查数据。尽管地理位置便利,但仍有 45%的受访者未使用激励计划;大多数非使用者(80.5%)不知道该计划。与非使用者相比,使用者的家庭收入更高(p<0.001),并且认识更多使用该计划的人(p<0.001)。超市是最常见的使用地点(59%);29%在农贸市场使用;11%在两个地点都使用。根据人口统计学、计划经验、水果和蔬菜购买和消费模式以及与使用相关的社会动态,用户特征因商店设置而异。我们的研究结果支持开展全面的提高认识的工作,并根据 SNAP 消费者的不同群体有针对性地实施激励计划,以促进计划覆盖范围的公平性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d1b/9101614/1a1c096a15c3/ijerph-19-04977-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d1b/9101614/1a1c096a15c3/ijerph-19-04977-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d1b/9101614/1a1c096a15c3/ijerph-19-04977-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Understanding SNAP Recipient Characteristics to Guide Equitable Expansion of Nutrition Incentive Programs in Diverse Food Retail Settings.了解 SNAP 受助人的特征,以指导在不同的食品零售环境中公平扩大营养激励计划。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 20;19(9):4977. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19094977.
2
Opportunities and Challenges of California's Fruit and Vegetable Electronic Benefit Transfer Pilot Project at Farmers' Markets: A Qualitative Study with Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Shoppers and Farmers' Market Staff.加利福尼亚州农贸市场水果和蔬菜电子福利转账试点项目的机遇与挑战:对补充营养援助计划购物者和农贸市场工作人员的定性研究。
Nutrients. 2024 Oct 5;16(19):3388. doi: 10.3390/nu16193388.
3
Understanding Impacts of SNAP Fruit and Vegetable Incentive Program at Farmers' Markets: Findings from a 13 State RCT.理解 SNAP 水果和蔬菜激励计划在农贸市场的影响:来自 13 个州 RCT 的发现。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 17;19(12):7443. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127443.
4
The California Nutrition Incentive Program: Participants' Perceptions and Associations with Produce Purchases, Consumption, and Food Security.加利福尼亚营养激励计划:参与者对购买、消费农产品和食品安全的看法及关联。
Nutrients. 2022 Jun 29;14(13):2699. doi: 10.3390/nu14132699.
5
Fruit and Vegetable Incentive Programs for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Participants: A Scoping Review of Program Structure.果蔬激励计划对补充营养援助计划(SNAP)参与者的影响:计划结构的范围综述。
Nutrients. 2020 Jun 4;12(6):1676. doi: 10.3390/nu12061676.
6
Farmers' Market Use Patterns Among Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Recipients With High Access to Farmers' Markets.在有高机会接触农贸市场的补充营养援助计划受助者中农贸市场的使用模式
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2017 May;49(5):397-404.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2017.01.007. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
7
Racial/Ethnic Differences in the Shopping Behaviors and Fruit and Vegetable Consumption of Farmers' Market Incentive Program Users in Illinois.伊利诺伊州农贸市场激励计划使用者的购物行为和果蔬消费的种族/民族差异。
Ethn Dis. 2020 Jan 16;30(1):109-118. doi: 10.18865/ed.30.1.109. eCollection 2020 Winter.
8
Comparison of Fruit and Vegetable Prices between Farmers' Markets and Supermarkets: Implications for Fruit and Vegetable Incentive Programs for Food Assistance Program Participants.农贸市场和超市的果蔬价格比较:对食品援助计划参与者的果蔬激励计划的启示。
Nutrients. 2022 Apr 28;14(9):1842. doi: 10.3390/nu14091842.
9
Predictors of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Use at Farmers' Markets With Monetary Incentive Programming.具有货币激励计划的农贸市场中补充营养援助计划使用的预测因素。
Am J Health Promot. 2019 Sep;33(7):1039-1048. doi: 10.1177/0890117119854708. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
10
Farmers' market shopping and dietary behaviours among Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participants.补充营养援助计划参与者的农贸市场购物与饮食行为
Public Health Nutr. 2015 Sep;18(13):2407-14. doi: 10.1017/S1368980015001111. Epub 2015 Apr 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Leveraging Technology to Engage Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Consumers With Children at Farmers Markets: Qualitative Community-Engaged Approach to App Development.利用技术让参与补充营养援助计划的有孩子的消费者在农贸市场参与活动:应用程序开发的定性社区参与方法
JMIR Form Res. 2025 May 16;9:e70104. doi: 10.2196/70104.
2
Predictors of Food Insecurity and Food Assistance Program Usage Among Puerto Ricans Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Holyoke, Massachusetts.马萨诸塞州 Holyoke 市波多黎各人在 COVID-19 大流行之前和期间食物不安全和使用食品援助计划的预测因素。
Nutrients. 2024 Oct 28;16(21):3666. doi: 10.3390/nu16213666.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Food system dynamics structuring nutrition equity in racialized urban neighborhoods.食物系统动态结构塑造了种族化城市社区的营养公平性。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2022 Apr 1;115(4):1027-1038. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab380.
2
Identification of factors related to food insecurity and the implications for social determinants of health screenings.识别与食物不安全相关的因素及其对健康筛查社会决定因素的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jul 16;21(1):1410. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11465-6.
3
Elevated Dietary Inflammation Among Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Recipients Provides Targets for Precision Public Health Intervention.
Food Is Medicine: A Presidential Advisory From the American Heart Association.
食物是良药:美国心脏协会的总统顾问报告
Circulation. 2023 Oct 31;148(18):1417-1439. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001182. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
4
Grocery Purchase Changes Were Associated With A North Carolina COVID-19 Food Assistance Incentive Program.杂货购买变化与北卡罗来纳州 COVID-19 食品援助激励计划有关。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Nov;41(11):1616-1625. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00902.
5
Improving Fruit and Vegetable Accessibility, Purchasing, and Consumption to Advance Nutrition Security and Health Equity in the United States.提高水果和蔬菜的可及性、购买量和食用量,以推进美国的营养安全和健康公平。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 7;19(18):11220. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811220.
补充营养援助计划(Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program,SNAP)受助人的饮食炎症水平升高为精准公共卫生干预提供了目标。
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Aug;61(2):192-200. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.02.007. Epub 2021 May 11.
4
Qualitative Study on Participant Perceptions of a Supermarket Fruit and Vegetable Incentive Program.关于参与者对超市水果和蔬菜激励计划看法的定性研究。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2021 Aug;121(8):1497-1506. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2020.10.010. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
5
Racial/Ethnic Differences in the Shopping Behaviors and Fruit and Vegetable Consumption of Farmers' Market Incentive Program Users in Illinois.伊利诺伊州农贸市场激励计划使用者的购物行为和果蔬消费的种族/民族差异。
Ethn Dis. 2020 Jan 16;30(1):109-118. doi: 10.18865/ed.30.1.109. eCollection 2020 Winter.
6
Facilitators and Barriers to Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Incentive Use: Findings From a Clinic Intervention for Low-Income Patients.补充营养援助计划激励措施的使用的促进因素和障碍:一项针对低收入患者的诊所干预措施的研究结果。
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Apr;56(4):571-579. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.11.010. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
7
Double Up Food Bucks Participation is Associated with Increased Fruit and Vegetable Consumption and Food Security Among Low-Income Adults.双倍食品券参与度与低收入成年人增加水果和蔬菜消费及粮食安全相关。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2019 Mar;51(3):342-347. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2018.08.011. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
8
Diet Quality Over the Monthly Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Cycle.每月补充营养援助计划周期中的饮食质量。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Aug;55(2):205-212. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.04.027. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
9
Double Up Food Bucks program effects on SNAP recipients' fruit and vegetable purchases.“双倍食品券计划”对补充营养援助计划(SNAP)受益人的水果和蔬菜购买行为的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Dec 12;17(1):946. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4942-z.
10
Incentivizing Fruit and Vegetable Purchasers at Fresh Markets in Lower 9th Ward, New Orleans.激励新奥尔良下九区新鲜市场的水果和蔬菜购买者。
Ethn Dis. 2017 Nov 9;27(Suppl 1):287-294. doi: 10.18865/ed.27.S1.287. eCollection 2017.