Momary Kathryn M, Lundquist Lisa M
Mercer University College of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Atlanta, GA 30341.
Mercer University College of Health Professions, Atlanta, GA 30341.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017 May;9(3):468-472. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
The primary objective of this study was to assess the effect of formal primary literature evaluation (PLE) during advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs) on student pharmacists' preparedness and knowledge related to literature evaluation.
A perception of preparedness survey and knowledge assessment was given to student pharmacists pre- and post-APPEs. Student pharmacists were also asked to characterize their opportunities for formal PLE during APPEs. Literature evaluation experiences, knowledge base and preparedness data were compared between student pharmacists who completed two or more PLE on APPE and those who did not.
A total of 211 student pharmacists completed 529 formal PLE during their APPE experiences. Quiz grades and average perception of preparedness increased significantly from pre- to post-APPE regardless of whether student pharmacists had the opportunity for formal PLE on APPE. Student pharmacists who completed two or more PLE on APPE stated they felt more confident in evaluating primary literature after APPE, had greater post-APPE preparedness scores and a trend towards higher post-APPE quiz scores.
APPEs provide an important opportunity for student pharmacists to improve their PLE knowledge.
本研究的主要目的是评估在高级药学实践经验(APPE)期间进行正式的初级文献评估(PLE)对学生药剂师文献评估准备情况和知识的影响。
在APPE前后对学生药剂师进行了准备情况感知调查和知识评估。还要求学生药剂师描述他们在APPE期间进行正式PLE的机会。比较了在APPE上完成两次或更多次PLE的学生药剂师和未完成的学生药剂师之间的文献评估经验、知识库和准备情况数据。
共有211名学生药剂师在其APPE经历中完成了529次正式PLE。无论学生药剂师在APPE上是否有机会进行正式PLE,测验成绩和准备情况的平均感知从APPE前到APPE后都显著提高。在APPE上完成两次或更多次PLE的学生药剂师表示,他们在APPE后对评估初级文献更有信心,APPE后的准备情况得分更高,并且APPE后测验成绩有提高的趋势。
APPE为学生药剂师提供了提高其PLE知识的重要机会。