Suppr超能文献

参与研究/写作小组对非终身制临床教员学术追求的影响。

The impact of participation in a Research/Writing Group on scholarly pursuits by non-tenure track clinical faculty.

作者信息

Fleming Laurie W, Malinowski Scott S, Fleming Joshua W, Brown Meagan A, Davis Courtney S, Hogan Shirley

机构信息

University of Mississippi School of Pharmacy, 2500 North State Street, Jackson, MS 39216, United States.

出版信息

Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017 May;9(3):486-490. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2016.12.004. Epub 2017 Apr 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the success of a faculty Research/Writing Group (RWG) by quantifying the amount of scholarly productivity from participants in the group compared with that of a matched cohort.

EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING

The RWG meets monthly to discuss current projects, providing an assessment of their scholarly activity. Participants offer ideas on improvement, resources and possible platforms for presentations and/or publications.

FINDINGS

To evaluate the success of this model, scholarly production from the participants in the RWG was compared to a matched group of clinical non-tenure track faculty not participating in the group over a three year period. Faculty perception of RWG participation was evaluated by data collected through a survey using Qualtrics.

SUMMARY

Participation in the RWG provided these junior faculty the support system to feel confident in their pursuit of scholarly activities; and therefore, they outpaced their counterparts in dissemination of their research.

摘要

背景与目的

本研究的目的是通过量化研究/写作小组(RWG)参与者的学术产出量,并与匹配队列的产出量进行比较,来评估该教师小组的成效。

教育活动与背景

RWG每月开会讨论当前项目,评估其学术活动。参与者就改进措施、资源以及展示和/或发表的可能平台提出想法。

研究结果

为评估该模式的成效,在三年时间里,将RWG参与者的学术成果与一组未参与该小组的临床非终身教职教师的匹配组进行了比较。通过使用Qualtrics进行的调查收集的数据,评估了教师对参与RWG的看法。

总结

参与RWG为这些初级教师提供了支持系统,使他们在追求学术活动时充满信心;因此,他们在研究传播方面超过了同行。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验