Nolette Shaun, Nguyen Alyssa, Kogan David, Oswald Catherine, Whittaker Alana, Chakraborty Arup
Roseman University of Health Sciences, College of Pharmacy, 11 Sunset Way, Henderson, NV 89014, United States.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017 Jul;9(4):633-638. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.03.004. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
Formative evaluation is a process utilized to improve communication between students and faculty. This evaluation method allows the ability to address pertinent issues in a timely manner; however, implementation of formative evaluation can be a challenge, especially in a large classroom setting. Using mediated formative evaluation, the purpose of this study is to determine if a student based focus group is a viable option to improve efficacy of communication between an instructor and students as well as time management in a large classroom setting.
Out of 140 total students, six students were selected to form a focus group - one from each of six total sections of the classroom. Each focus group representative was responsible for collecting all the questions from students of their corresponding sections and submitting them to the instructor two to three times a day. Responses from the instructor were either passed back to pertinent students by the focus group representatives or addressed directly with students by the instructor. This study was conducted using a fifteen-question survey after the focus group model was utilized for one month. A printed copy of the survey was distributed in the class by student investigators. Questions were of varying types, including Likert scale, yes/no, and open-ended response.
One hundred forty surveys were administered, and 90 complete responses were collected. Surveys showed that 93.3% of students found that use of the focus group made them more likely to ask questions for understanding. The surveys also showed 95.5% of students found utilizing the focus group for questions allowed for better understanding of difficult concepts. General open-ended answer portions of the survey showed that most students found the focus group allowed them to ask questions more easily since they did not feel intimidated by asking in front of the whole class. No correlation was found between demographic characteristics and survey responses. This may demonstrate that students in similar large classroom settings may respond in a similar fashion.
An overwhelmingly positive result suggests focus groups may be a valuable addition to communication routes currently employed in classrooms. The focus group offers an alternate pathway to improve student understanding in larger lecture classroom environments and may encourage more students to seek answers to questions in a timely manner without breaking classroom flow.
形成性评价是一种用于改善学生与教师之间沟通的过程。这种评价方法能够及时解决相关问题;然而,实施形成性评价可能具有挑战性,尤其是在大型课堂环境中。本研究采用中介形成性评价,旨在确定以学生为基础的焦点小组是否是提高教师与学生之间沟通效果以及大型课堂环境中时间管理效率的可行选择。
在总共140名学生中,挑选了6名学生组成一个焦点小组——从课堂的6个总部分中各选一名。每个焦点小组代表负责收集其相应部分学生的所有问题,并每天向教师提交两到三次。教师的回复要么由焦点小组代表反馈给相关学生,要么由教师直接与学生沟通。在焦点小组模式使用一个月后,通过一项包含15个问题的调查开展了本研究。调查问卷的打印副本由学生调查员在课堂上分发。问题类型多样,包括李克特量表、是/否以及开放式回答。
共发放了140份调查问卷,收集到90份完整回复。调查显示,93.3%的学生发现使用焦点小组使他们更有可能为理解而提问。调查还显示,95.5%的学生发现利用焦点小组提问有助于更好地理解难懂的概念。调查问卷的一般开放式回答部分显示,大多数学生发现焦点小组让他们更容易提问,因为他们在全班面前提问时不会感到害怕。未发现人口统计学特征与调查回复之间存在相关性。这可能表明,处于类似大型课堂环境中的学生可能会有类似的反应。
压倒性的积极结果表明,焦点小组可能是目前课堂中使用的沟通途径的一个有价值的补充。焦点小组为在大型讲座课堂环境中提高学生理解提供了一条替代途径,并可能鼓励更多学生及时寻求问题的答案,而不会打乱课堂节奏。