McAuley James W, Backo Jennifer Lynn, Sobota Kristen Finley, Metzger Anne H, Ulbrich Timothy
The Ohio State University College of Pharmacy, Columbus, OH.
Ohio Northern University, Raabe College of Pharmacy, Ada, OH.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017 Jan-Feb;9(1):20-27. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2016.08.029. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
To identify motivators and barriers to pharmacy student completion of instructor evaluations, and to develop potential strategies to improve the evaluation process.
Completed at four Ohio Colleges of Pharmacy, Phase I consisted of a student/faculty survey and Phase II consisted of joint student/faculty focus groups to discuss Phase I data and to problem solve.
In Phase I, the top three student-identified and faculty-perceived motivators to completion of evaluations were to (1) make the course better, (2) earn bonus points, and (3) improve the instructor's teaching. The top three student-identified barriers to completion of evaluations were having to (1) evaluate multiple instructors, (2) complete several evaluations around the same time, and (3) complete lengthy evaluations. Phase II focus groups identified a number of potential ways to enhance the motivators and reduce barriers, including but not limited to making sure faculty convey to students that the feedback they provide is useful and to provide examples of how student feedback has been used to improve their teaching/the course.
Students and faculty identified motivators and barriers to completing instructor evaluations and were willing to work together to improve the process.
确定药学专业学生完成教师评价的动机和障碍,并制定改善评价过程的潜在策略。
该研究在俄亥俄州的四所药学院进行,第一阶段包括学生/教师调查,第二阶段包括学生/教师联合焦点小组,以讨论第一阶段的数据并解决问题。
在第一阶段,学生确定且教师认可的完成评价的前三大动机是:(1)改进课程;(2)获得加分;(3)提高教师教学水平。学生确定的完成评价的前三大障碍是:(1)必须评价多名教师;(2)在同一时间完成多项评价;(3)完成冗长的评价。第二阶段的焦点小组确定了一些增强动机和减少障碍的潜在方法,包括但不限于确保教师向学生传达他们提供的反馈是有用的,并提供学生反馈如何被用于改进教学/课程的示例。
学生和教师确定了完成教师评价的动机和障碍,并愿意共同努力改进评价过程。