• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Pharmacy student focus groups for formative evaluation of the learning environment.用于学习环境形成性评估的药学专业学生焦点小组。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2007 Apr 15;71(2):22. doi: 10.5688/aj710222.
2
There's got to be a better way! Introducing faculty to mid-course formative reviews as a constructive tool for growth and development.一定有更好的办法!向教师介绍课程中期形成性评估,将其作为促进成长和发展的建设性工具。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2018 Sep;10(9):1228-1236. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2018.06.015. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
3
Using curriculum mapping to engage faculty members in the analysis of a pharmacy program.利用课程映射让教师参与药学专业课程分析。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 Sep 15;78(7):139. doi: 10.5688/ajpe787139.
4
Efficacy of formative evaluation using a focus group for a large classroom setting in an accelerated pharmacy program.在加速药学项目的大课堂环境中使用焦点小组进行形成性评估的效果。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017 Jul;9(4):633-638. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.03.004. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
5
Faculty and student perceptions of effective study strategies and materials.教师和学生对有效学习策略和材料的看法。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2011 Dec 15;75(10):201. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7510201.
6
Heart of Pharmacy: a course exploring the psychosocial issues of patient care.药学之魂:一门探索患者护理心理社会问题的课程。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2009 Dec 17;73(8):149. doi: 10.5688/aj7308149.
7
Qualitative Analysis of the Impact of Changes to the Student Evaluation of Teaching Process.教学评估过程变化的影响的定性分析。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Jan;84(1):7110. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7110.
8
A Faculty Toolkit for Formative Assessment in Pharmacy Education.药学教育中形成性评估的教师工具包。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 Nov 15;78(9):160. doi: 10.5688/ajpe789160.
9
Use of an audience response system (ARS) in a dual-campus classroom environment.在双校区课堂环境中使用观众反应系统(ARS)。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2008 Apr 15;72(2):38. doi: 10.5688/aj720238.
10
Academic entitlement in pharmacy education.药学教育中的学术权利。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2012 Dec 12;76(10):189. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7610189.

引用本文的文献

1
Applying Visual Research Methods in Pharmacy Education.在药学教育中应用视觉研究方法。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Jan;84(1):7123. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7123.
2
Identification of Key Business and Management Skills Needed for Pharmacy Graduates.药学专业毕业生所需的关键商业和管理技能的识别。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2018 Oct;82(8):6364. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6364.
3
Development and Application of a Stepwise Assessment Process for Rational Redesign of Sequential Skills-Based Courses.基于顺序技能的课程合理重新设计的逐步评估过程的开发与应用
Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 Oct 25;80(8):136. doi: 10.5688/ajpe808136.

本文引用的文献

1
Focus groups as a tool for critical social research in nurse education.焦点小组作为护理教育中批判性社会研究的一种工具。
Nurse Educ Today. 2001 May;21(4):323-33. doi: 10.1054/nedt.2001.0563.
2
Focus groups.焦点小组
Int J Qual Health Care. 1996 Oct;8(5):499-504. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/8.5.499.

用于学习环境形成性评估的药学专业学生焦点小组。

Pharmacy student focus groups for formative evaluation of the learning environment.

作者信息

Bhavsar Victoria Mundy, Bird Eleanora, Anderson Heidi M

机构信息

University of Kentucky Teaching and Academic Support Center, USA.

出版信息

Am J Pharm Educ. 2007 Apr 15;71(2):22. doi: 10.5688/aj710222.

DOI:10.5688/aj710222
PMID:17533431
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1858605/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop a student focus group process for formative evaluation of the learning environment in a college of pharmacy.

DESIGN

Student focus groups were formed and met from fall 2002 to spring 2006. During spring 2005, student cohorts (first- through third-professional years) were surveyed and anecdotal evidence about the process was gathered from faculty members.

ASSESSMENT

Student opinions about the effectiveness of the focus groups were fairly positive, with 59% to 87% agreeing that the process allowed students to communicate effectively with faculty members. The main problems identified were lack of communication between focus group members and the student body, and the lack of response by some faculty members to student concerns. Based on anecdotal evidence, faculty members agreed that the process encouraged student development but was less useful for pedagogical issues.

CONCLUSION

Focus groups can be an effective way of providing feedback to faculty members and students about the classroom learning environment if students are trained to give appropriate feedback and professors are supported in responding to student input.

摘要

目的

开发一种学生焦点小组流程,用于对药学院的学习环境进行形成性评估。

设计

从2002年秋季到2006年春季成立了学生焦点小组并举行会议。2005年春季,对各年级(第一至第三专业学年)的学生进行了调查,并从教师那里收集了有关该流程的轶事证据。

评估

学生对焦点小组有效性的看法相当积极,59%至87%的学生认为该流程使学生能够与教师有效沟通。发现的主要问题是焦点小组成员与学生群体之间缺乏沟通,以及一些教师对学生关切的问题没有回应。根据轶事证据,教师们一致认为该流程促进了学生的发展,但在教学问题上作用较小。

结论

如果学生得到适当反馈的培训,并且教授在回应学生意见方面得到支持,焦点小组可以成为向教师和学生提供有关课堂学习环境反馈的有效方式。