Suppr超能文献

葡萄园中的土壤生物群受植物和土壤质量的影响大于耕作强度或周围景观的影响。

Soil biota in vineyards are more influenced by plants and soil quality than by tillage intensity or the surrounding landscape.

机构信息

Institute of Zoology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna (BOKU), Gregor Mendel Straße 33, 1180, Vienna, Austria.

Grupo de Protección Vegetal, Departamento de Protección Ambiental, Estación Experimental de Zaidín, CSIC, Profesor Albareda n◦ 1, 18008, Granada, Spain.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 12;7(1):17445. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17601-w.

Abstract

Tillage is known for its adverse effects on soil biota, at least in arable agroecosystems. However, in vineyards effects might differ as tillage is often performed during dry periods or only in every other inter-row allowing species to re-colonise disturbed areas. We examined the response of earthworms (lumbricids), springtails (collembola) and litter decomposition to periodically mechanically disturbed (PMD) and permanently green covered (PGC) vineyard inter-rows and assessed whether site effects are altered by the surrounding landscape. In commercial vineyards in Austria we sampled earthworms by handsorting, springtails by soil coring and pitfall trapping and installed litter decomposition bags. Earthworm species diversity increased with plant biomass under PMD but not under PGC; earthworm density was unaffected by tillage but increased with plant biomass mainly at high soil quality (soil fertility index). Springtail species diversity was unaffected by tillage; springtail densities (mainly larger species) were reduced under PGC. Litter decomposition was little affected by investigated parameters. Landscape heterogeneity affected the functional diversity of surface springtails, but did not influence soil-dwelling springtails, earthworms or litter decomposition. We conclude that effects on soil biota of periodical tillage in vineyards need not necessarily be detrimental and will be modified by plant biomass and soil quality.

摘要

耕作会对土壤生物群产生不利影响,至少在耕地农业生态系统中是如此。然而,在葡萄园,耕作的影响可能会有所不同,因为耕作通常在干旱期进行,或者只在每行之间进行一次,以便物种重新占领受干扰的区域。我们研究了周期性机械干扰(PMD)和永久性绿色覆盖(PGC)葡萄园行间对蚯蚓(环节动物)、跳虫(弹尾目)和凋落物分解的影响,并评估了周围景观是否改变了地点效应。在奥地利的商业葡萄园,我们通过手工分拣、土壤钻芯和陷阱捕捉来采集蚯蚓,通过安装凋落物分解袋来采集跳虫。在 PMD 下,随着植物生物量的增加,蚯蚓物种多样性增加,但在 PGC 下则没有;耕作对蚯蚓密度没有影响,但随着植物生物量的增加,蚯蚓密度主要在高土壤质量(土壤肥力指数)下增加。耕作对跳虫物种多样性没有影响;PGC 下跳虫密度(主要是较大的物种)降低。凋落物分解受调查参数的影响较小。景观异质性影响地表跳虫的功能多样性,但不影响土壤跳虫、蚯蚓或凋落物分解。我们得出结论,葡萄园周期性耕作对土壤生物群的影响不一定是有害的,并且会受到植物生物量和土壤质量的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9668/5727173/e5efe75254ef/41598_2017_17601_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验