• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

罗马尼亚中部葡萄园行间管理对植物及地表无脊椎动物多样性和丰度的影响。

Effects of vineyard inter-row management on the diversity and abundance of plants and surface-dwelling invertebrates in Central Romania.

作者信息

Fiera Cristina, Ulrich Werner, Popescu Daniela, Bunea Claudiu-Ioan, Manu Minodora, Nae Ioana, Stan Melania, Markó Bálint, Urák István, Giurginca Andrei, Penke Nicole, Winter Silvia, Kratschmer Sophie, Buchholz Jacob, Querner Pascal, Zaller Johann G

机构信息

1Institute of Biology Bucharest, Romanian Academy, 296 Splaiul Independenţei, P.O. Box 56-53, 060031 Bucharest, Romania.

2Department of Ecology and Biogeography, Nicolaus Copernicus University Toruń, Lwowska 1, 87100 Toruń, Poland.

出版信息

J Insect Conserv. 2020;24(1):175-185. doi: 10.1007/s10841-019-00215-0. Epub 2020 Jan 14.

DOI:10.1007/s10841-019-00215-0
PMID:32089639
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7002328/
Abstract

Vineyard inter-rows are important biodiversity hotspots within agricultural landscapes, especially when they are covered with vegetation. However, little is known on the effects to management intensity on a broad range of surface-dwelling invertebrates and their interaction with vegetation. We assessed the diversity and activity density of ants, beetles, millipedes, mites, spiders, springtails and woodlice using pitfall traps in vineyards with either high management intensity (HI) consisting of frequently tilled inter-rows or low management intensity (LO) with alternating tillage in every second inter-row. The study was performed in the Târnave wine region in Central Romania. We wanted to know whether, (i) vineyard management intensity affects the diversity of plants and invertebrates, and (ii) local habitat characteristics affect species richness of different functional guilds and taxa. Species richness of some invertebrate taxa (Coleoptera, Araneae, Formicidae) did significantly differ between HI and LO vineyards. Only phytophages (some Coleoptera) increased in species richness and activity density with vegetation cover. Vineyard soil properties (organic matter content, pH, P, and K) did not significantly differ between HI and LO vineyards. We conclude that vineyard inter-row management can affect both the conservation of biodiversity and the provision of biodiversity-driven ecosystem services.

摘要

葡萄园的行间区域是农业景观中重要的生物多样性热点地区,尤其是当它们被植被覆盖时。然而,对于管理强度对广泛的地表无脊椎动物的影响以及它们与植被的相互作用,我们知之甚少。我们在罗马尼亚中部的塔尔纳韦葡萄酒产区,使用陷阱诱捕法评估了高管理强度(HI,行间频繁耕作)或低管理强度(LO,每隔一行交替耕作)的葡萄园中的蚂蚁、甲虫、千足虫、螨虫、蜘蛛、跳虫和鼠妇的多样性和活动密度。我们想了解:(i)葡萄园管理强度是否会影响植物和无脊椎动物的多样性;(ii)当地生境特征是否会影响不同功能类群和分类单元的物种丰富度。一些无脊椎动物分类单元(鞘翅目、蜘蛛目、蚁科)的物种丰富度在HI和LO葡萄园之间存在显著差异。只有植食性动物(一些鞘翅目)的物种丰富度和活动密度随着植被覆盖度的增加而增加。HI和LO葡萄园之间的葡萄园土壤性质(有机质含量、pH值、磷和钾)没有显著差异。我们得出结论,葡萄园行间管理既可以影响生物多样性的保护,也可以影响由生物多样性驱动的生态系统服务的提供。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da4d/7002328/853822cf2c22/10841_2019_215_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da4d/7002328/8cae059bf35b/10841_2019_215_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da4d/7002328/e46d621c90c2/10841_2019_215_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da4d/7002328/853822cf2c22/10841_2019_215_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da4d/7002328/8cae059bf35b/10841_2019_215_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da4d/7002328/e46d621c90c2/10841_2019_215_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da4d/7002328/853822cf2c22/10841_2019_215_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of vineyard inter-row management on the diversity and abundance of plants and surface-dwelling invertebrates in Central Romania.罗马尼亚中部葡萄园行间管理对植物及地表无脊椎动物多样性和丰度的影响。
J Insect Conserv. 2020;24(1):175-185. doi: 10.1007/s10841-019-00215-0. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
2
Effects of vegetation management intensity on biodiversity and ecosystem services in vineyards: A meta-analysis.葡萄园植被管理强度对生物多样性和生态系统服务的影响:一项荟萃分析。
J Appl Ecol. 2018 Sep;55(5):2484-2495. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.13124. Epub 2018 Mar 4.
3
Vegetation increases abundances of ground and canopy arthropods in Mediterranean vineyards.植被增加了地中海葡萄园地面和树冠节肢动物的数量。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 7;12(1):3680. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07529-1.
4
Response of wild bee diversity, abundance, and functional traits to vineyard inter-row management intensity and landscape diversity across Europe.欧洲野生蜜蜂多样性、丰度及功能性状对葡萄园行间管理强度和景观多样性的响应
Ecol Evol. 2019 Mar 12;9(7):4103-4115. doi: 10.1002/ece3.5039. eCollection 2019 Apr.
5
Enhancing flowering plant functional richness improves wild bee diversity in vineyard inter-rows in different floral kingdoms.提高开花植物功能丰富度可改善不同植物区系葡萄园行间的野生蜜蜂多样性。
Ecol Evol. 2021 May 4;11(12):7927-7945. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7623. eCollection 2021 Jun.
6
Mutual and Opposing Responses of Carabid Beetles and Predatory Wasps to Local and Landscape Factors in Vineyards.葡萄园中甲虫和捕食性黄蜂对局部和景观因素的相互对立反应
Insects. 2020 Oct 30;11(11):746. doi: 10.3390/insects11110746.
7
Soil biota in vineyards are more influenced by plants and soil quality than by tillage intensity or the surrounding landscape.葡萄园中的土壤生物群受植物和土壤质量的影响大于耕作强度或周围景观的影响。
Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 12;7(1):17445. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17601-w.
8
Selection of inter-row herbaceous covers in a sloping, organic, non-irrigated vineyard.在一个倾斜的、有机的、非灌溉的葡萄园里选择行间草本覆盖物。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 30;17(12):e0279759. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279759. eCollection 2022.
9
Even the smallest non-crop habitat islands could be beneficial: distribution of carabid beetles and spiders in agricultural landscape.即使是最小的非农作物栖息地岛屿也可能有益:农业景观中步甲和蜘蛛的分布。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 10;10(4):e0123052. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123052. eCollection 2015.
10
Influence of Vineyard Inter-Row Groundcover Vegetation Management on Arthropod Assemblages in the Vineyards of North-Eastern Italy.意大利东北部葡萄园行间地面覆盖植被管理对节肢动物群落的影响
Insects. 2021 Apr 14;12(4):349. doi: 10.3390/insects12040349.

引用本文的文献

1
Selecting species for vineyard inter-row vegetation cover requires consideration of microenvironmental conditions.为葡萄园行间植被覆盖选择物种需要考虑微环境条件。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 21;20(3):e0319848. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319848. eCollection 2025.
2
Yeasts, arthropods, and environmental matrix: a triad to disentangle the multi-level definition of biodiversity.酵母、节肢动物和环境基质:解析生物多样性多层次定义的三联体。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 30;14(1):20144. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70327-4.
3
Influence of Vineyard Inter-Row Management on Grapevine Leafhoppers and Their Natural Enemies.

本文引用的文献

1
Response of wild bee diversity, abundance, and functional traits to vineyard inter-row management intensity and landscape diversity across Europe.欧洲野生蜜蜂多样性、丰度及功能性状对葡萄园行间管理强度和景观多样性的响应
Ecol Evol. 2019 Mar 12;9(7):4103-4115. doi: 10.1002/ece3.5039. eCollection 2019 Apr.
2
Effects of vegetation management intensity on biodiversity and ecosystem services in vineyards: A meta-analysis.葡萄园植被管理强度对生物多样性和生态系统服务的影响:一项荟萃分析。
J Appl Ecol. 2018 Sep;55(5):2484-2495. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.13124. Epub 2018 Mar 4.
3
Soil biota in vineyards are more influenced by plants and soil quality than by tillage intensity or the surrounding landscape.
葡萄园行间管理对葡萄叶蝉及其天敌的影响。
Insects. 2024 May 14;15(5):355. doi: 10.3390/insects15050355.
4
Vegetation increases abundances of ground and canopy arthropods in Mediterranean vineyards.植被增加了地中海葡萄园地面和树冠节肢动物的数量。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 7;12(1):3680. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07529-1.
5
Biodiversity in a Cool-Climate Vineyard: A Case Study from Quebec.凉爽气候葡萄园的生物多样性:来自魁北克的案例研究
Insects. 2021 Aug 19;12(8):750. doi: 10.3390/insects12080750.
6
Enhancing flowering plant functional richness improves wild bee diversity in vineyard inter-rows in different floral kingdoms.提高开花植物功能丰富度可改善不同植物区系葡萄园行间的野生蜜蜂多样性。
Ecol Evol. 2021 May 4;11(12):7927-7945. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7623. eCollection 2021 Jun.
7
Mutual and Opposing Responses of Carabid Beetles and Predatory Wasps to Local and Landscape Factors in Vineyards.葡萄园中甲虫和捕食性黄蜂对局部和景观因素的相互对立反应
Insects. 2020 Oct 30;11(11):746. doi: 10.3390/insects11110746.
葡萄园中的土壤生物群受植物和土壤质量的影响大于耕作强度或周围景观的影响。
Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 12;7(1):17445. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17601-w.
4
The influence of weed-cover on the mortality imposed on artificial prey by predatory ground beetles in cereal fields.杂草覆盖对麦田中捕食性步甲对人工猎物造成的死亡率的影响。
Oecologia. 1976 Sep;23(3):211-223. doi: 10.1007/BF00361237.
5
Arthropods vector grapevine trunk disease pathogens.节肢动物是葡萄树干病害病原体的传播媒介。
Phytopathology. 2014 Oct;104(10):1063-9. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-11-13-0303-R.
6
Ecological intensification: harnessing ecosystem services for food security.生态强化:利用生态系统服务保障粮食安全。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2013 Apr;28(4):230-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2012.10.012. Epub 2012 Nov 12.
7
Identifying signature of chemical applications on indigenous and invasive nontarget arthropod communities in vineyards.鉴定葡萄园本地和入侵非靶标节肢动物群落中化学应用的特征。
Ecol Appl. 2010 Sep;20(6):1693-703. doi: 10.1890/09-1065.1.
8
Soil arthropods (Coleoptera, Isopoda) in organic and conventional agroecosystems.有机和传统农业生态系统中的土壤节肢动物(鞘翅目、等足目)
Environ Manage. 2002 May;29(5):683-90. doi: 10.1007/s00267-001-0056-5.