Hayashi Katsuhiro, Niu Xiaohui, Tang Xiaodong, Singh Vivek Ajit, Asavamongkolkul Apichat, Kawai Akira, Yamamoto Norio, Shirai Toshiharu, Takeuchi Akihiko, Kimura Hiroaki, Miwa Shinji, Tsuchiya Hiroyuki
Department of Orthopaedics, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa 920-8641, Japan.
Orthopaedic Oncology Department, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Peking University, Beijing 100035, China.
J Bone Oncol. 2016 Oct 15;9:55-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jbo.2016.10.003. eCollection 2017 Nov.
Total scapulectomy and reconstruction has been performed for scapular tumor, however, most of the reconstruction methods have resulted in poor functional outcomes and there is still room for improvement. Most of the reports of reconstruction after scapulectomy are from a single institution. In the present study, we investigated functional outcomes after total scapulectomy in a multicenter study in The Eastern Asian Musculoskeletal Oncology Group (EAMOG). Thirty-three patients who underwent total scapulectomy were registered at EAMOG affiliated hospitals. The patients were separated into no reconstruction group (n=8), humeral suspension group (n=15) and prosthesis group (n=10). Functional outcome was assessed by the Enneking score. One-way ANOVA was used to compare parameters between the patient groups. Complications included five local recurrences, one superficial infection, one dislocation and one clavicle protrusion. The average follow-up period was 43.5 months. The average active flexion range was 45.8° (0-120°), and 37.1° in abduction (0-120°). The mean total functional score was 22.9 out of 30 (15-29), which is a satisfactory score following resection of the shoulder girdle. There were significant differences in reconstruction methods for active range of motion. Bony reconstruction provided better range of motion in this study. There was a variety of reconstruction methods after scapulectomy in the eastern Asian countries. Although better functional score was obtained using scapular prosthesis or recycled bone and prosthesis composite grafting, postoperative function is still lower than preoperative function. Modified designed prosthesis with or without combination of recycle bone or allograft would restore the lost shoulder function in the future.
对于肩胛骨肿瘤已实施全肩胛骨切除术及重建术,然而,大多数重建方法的功能结局不佳,仍有改进空间。肩胛骨切除术后重建的大多数报告来自单一机构。在本研究中,我们在东亚肌肉骨骼肿瘤学组(EAMOG)的一项多中心研究中调查了全肩胛骨切除术后的功能结局。33例行全肩胛骨切除术的患者在EAMOG附属医院登记。患者被分为未重建组(n = 8)、肱骨悬吊组(n = 15)和假体组(n = 10)。通过Enneking评分评估功能结局。采用单因素方差分析比较患者组之间的参数。并发症包括5例局部复发、1例表浅感染、1例脱位和1例锁骨突出。平均随访期为43.5个月。平均主动屈曲范围为45.8°(0 - 120°),外展为37.1°(0 - 120°)。平均总功能评分为30分中的22.9分(15 - 29分),这在肩胛带切除术后是一个令人满意的分数。主动活动范围的重建方法存在显著差异。在本研究中,骨重建提供了更好的活动范围。在东亚国家,肩胛骨切除术后有多种重建方法。尽管使用肩胛骨假体或回收骨与假体复合移植获得了更好的功能评分,但术后功能仍低于术前功能。改良设计的假体无论是否结合回收骨或同种异体骨,未来都将恢复丧失的肩部功能。