• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

专家系统在乳腺X线图像分析中的应用。

Application of expert systems to mammographic image analysis.

作者信息

Cook H M, Fox M D

机构信息

University of Connecticut, School of Engineering, Storrs 06268.

出版信息

Am J Physiol Imaging. 1989;4(1):16-22.

PMID:2923720
Abstract

A prototype expert system was designed for differentiation of 16 circumscribed breast abnormalities utilizing findings identified by a human observer from X-ray mammograms, clinical data, and patient history. An off-the-shelf expert system shell served as the foundation for the rule base. The system runs on standard microcomputer hardware. Preliminary results suggest the expert system may be valuable in improving the ability of relatively unskilled observers to screen X-ray mammograms. Overall, radiology residents with limited experience in mammographic image analysis obtained a diagnostic accuracy level of 40% on their own, whereas they attained 73% accuracy level when using the expert system. A group of biomedical engineering students with no prior experience in mammographic image analysis obtained on the average an 80% diagnostic accuracy level utilizing the expert system in comparison with the 70% average accuracy level obtained by practicing radiologists without use of the system.

摘要

设计了一个原型专家系统,用于鉴别16种乳腺局限性异常,该系统利用人类观察者从乳腺X线摄影、临床数据和患者病史中识别出的结果。一个现成的专家系统外壳作为规则库的基础。该系统在标准微机硬件上运行。初步结果表明,该专家系统可能有助于提高技术不太熟练的观察者筛查乳腺X线摄影的能力。总体而言,在乳腺钼靶图像分析方面经验有限的放射科住院医师独立诊断准确率为40%,而使用专家系统时准确率达到73%。一组此前没有乳腺钼靶图像分析经验的生物医学工程专业学生,使用该专家系统平均诊断准确率达到80%,而有经验的放射科医生不使用该系统时平均准确率为70%。

相似文献

1
Application of expert systems to mammographic image analysis.专家系统在乳腺X线图像分析中的应用。
Am J Physiol Imaging. 1989;4(1):16-22.
2
Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.使用数字化图像与乳腺钼靶摄影对乳腺肿块诊断准确性的比较。
Acta Radiol. 2008 Jul;49(6):618-22. doi: 10.1080/02841850802014610.
3
Clinical evaluation of a new set of image quality criteria for mammography.一套用于乳腺钼靶摄影的新图像质量标准的临床评估。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;114(1-3):389-94. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nch573.
4
[The heuristics of expert systems in radiodiagnosis].[放射诊断中专家系统的启发式方法]
J Radiol. 1986 Dec;67(12):853-61.
5
Digital mammography, computer-aided diagnosis, and telemammography.数字化乳腺摄影、计算机辅助诊断及远程乳腺摄影。
Radiol Clin North Am. 1995 Nov;33(6):1205-30.
6
Can the average glandular dose in routine digital mammography screening be reduced? A pilot study using revised image quality criteria.常规数字化乳腺钼靶筛查中的平均腺体剂量能降低吗?一项采用修订图像质量标准的试点研究。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;114(1-3):383-8. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nch555.
7
Comparison of two commercial systems for computer-assisted detection (CAD) as an aid to interpreting screening mammograms.两种用于计算机辅助检测(CAD)的商业系统作为乳腺钼靶筛查解读辅助手段的比较。
Radiol Med. 2004 May-Jun;107(5-6):480-8.
8
Update in digital mammography.
Crit Rev Diagn Imaging. 1997;38(1):89-113.
9
Radiology image interpretation system: modified observer performance study of an image interpretation expert system.放射学图像解读系统:图像解读专家系统的改良观察者性能研究
J Digit Imaging. 1991 May;4(2):94-101. doi: 10.1007/BF03170417.
10
Image understanding system for histopathology.用于组织病理学的图像理解系统。
Anal Cell Pathol. 1989 Aug;1(4):195-214.

引用本文的文献

1
CADMIUM II: acquisition and representation of radiological knowledge for computerized decision support in mammography.镉II:用于乳腺X线摄影计算机辅助决策支持的放射学知识获取与呈现
Proc AMIA Symp. 2000:7-11.
2
Clinical use of digital mammography: the present and the prospects.
J Digit Imaging. 1995 Feb;8(1 Suppl 1):74-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03168072.
3
The prospect of expert system-based cognitive support as a by-product of image acquisition and reporting.基于专家系统的认知支持作为图像采集和报告副产品的前景。
J Digit Imaging. 1991 Nov;4(4):233-40. doi: 10.1007/BF03173905.