Maeda Noriaki, Urabe Yukio, Tsutsumi Shogo, Sakai Shogo, Fujishita Hironori, Kobayashi Toshiki, Asaeda Makoto, Hirata Kazuhiko, Mikami Yukio, Kimura Hiroaki
Division of Sports Rehabilitation, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Department of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University of Science, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
J Sports Sci Med. 2017 Dec 1;16(4):514-520. eCollection 2017 Dec.
This study aimed to clarify the acute effects of static stretching (SS) and cyclic stretching (CS) on muscle stiffness and hardness of the medial gastrocnemius muscle (MG) by using ultrasonography, range of motion (ROM) of the ankle joint and ankle plantar flexor. Twenty healthy men participated in this study. Participants were randomly assigned to SS, CS and control conditions. Each session consisted of a standard 5-minute cycle warm-up, accompanied by one of the subsequent conditions in another day: (a) 2 minutes static stretching, (b) 2 minutes cyclic stretching, (c) control. Maximum ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (ROM max) and normalized peak torque (NPT) of ankle plantar flexor were measured in the pre- and post-stretching. To assess muscle stiffness, muscle-tendon junction (MTJ) displacement (the length changes in tendon and muscle) and MTJ angle (the angle made by the tendon of insertion and muscle fascicle) of MG were measured using ultrasonography at an ankle dorsiflexion angle of -10°, 0°, 10° and 20° before and after SS and CS for 2 minutes in the pre- and post-stretching. MG hardness was measured using ultrasound real-time tissue elastography (RTE). The results of this study indicate a significant effect of SS for ROM maximum, MTJ angle (0°, 10°, 20°) and RTE (10°, 20°) compared with CS (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in MTJ displacement between SS and CS. CS was associated with significantly higher NPT values than SS. This study suggests that SS of 2 minutes' hold duration significantly affected muscle stiffness and hardness compared with CS. In addition, CS may contribute to the elongation of muscle tissue and increased muscle strength.
本研究旨在通过超声检查、踝关节活动范围(ROM)和踝关节跖屈肌,阐明静态拉伸(SS)和循环拉伸(CS)对腓肠肌内侧头(MG)肌肉僵硬度和硬度的急性影响。20名健康男性参与了本研究。参与者被随机分配到SS、CS和对照组。每个训练阶段包括标准的5分钟循环热身,随后在另一天进行以下条件之一:(a)2分钟静态拉伸,(b)2分钟循环拉伸,(c)对照。在拉伸前后测量踝关节最大背屈活动范围(ROM max)和踝关节跖屈肌的标准化峰值扭矩(NPT)。为了评估肌肉僵硬度,在SS和CS前后,于-10°、0°、10°和20°的踝关节背屈角度下,使用超声检查测量MG的肌腱-肌肉连接处(MTJ)位移(肌腱和肌肉的长度变化)和MTJ角度(插入肌腱和肌束形成的角度),拉伸时间为2分钟。使用超声实时组织弹性成像(RTE)测量MG硬度。本研究结果表明,与CS相比,SS对最大ROM、MTJ角度(0°、10°、20°)和RTE(10°、20°)有显著影响(p < 0.05)。SS和CS之间的MTJ位移没有显著差异。CS与显著高于SS的NPT值相关。本研究表明,与CS相比,持续2分钟的SS对肌肉僵硬度和硬度有显著影响。此外,CS可能有助于肌肉组织的伸长和肌肉力量的增加。