Suppr超能文献

氢氟酸表面处理对CAD/CAM陶瓷微剪切粘结强度的影响。

Effect of hydrofluoric acid surface treatments on micro-shear bond strength of CAD/CAM ceramics.

作者信息

Mokhtarpour Faraneh, Alaghehmand Homayoon, Khafri Soraya

机构信息

Assistant Professor, Department of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.

Associate Professor, Dental Materials Research Center, Department of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.

出版信息

Electron Physician. 2017 Oct 25;9(10):5487-5493. doi: 10.19082/5487. eCollection 2017 Oct.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Dental ceramics are appreciated as highly esthetic restorative materials that can simulate the appearance of natural dentition better than other materials. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of hydrofluoric acid concentration and etching time on micro-shear bond strength (μSBS) to IPS e.max CAD and Vita Mark II of a dual cured resin cement (Panavia F2.0).

METHODS

This study was an experimental in vitro study, performed in the dental material research center of Babol University of Medical Sciences in 2016. Two hydrofluoric acid concentrations (5% and 10%) and three different etching times (20, 60 and 120 seconds) were used to etch the specimens respectively. A silane coupling agent (Clearfil porcelain activator) and priming and bonding agent (Clearfil SE bond) were used on the etched surfaces in accordance to the manufacturer's instructions of use. Then resin cement was applied on the prepared ceramic surfaces and light cured. μSBS between resin cement and the porcelains were measured with a universal testing machine. Mode of failure was observed with 40× magnification by means of a Stereo microscope. Data were analyzed with ANOVA and independent-samples t-test and Chi-square tests.

RESULTS

In both e.max and Vita Mark II groups, μSBS were not significantly different when different etching times (one-way ANOVA) and HF acid concentrations (Independent-samples t-test) were used (p>0.05), but the highest μSBS was shown in e.max specimens etched 60 s with 5% HF and Vita Mark II specimens etched 20 s with 10% HF. μSBS of e.max was significantly higher than Vita Mark II (p=0.00).

CONCLUSION

Best surface treatment for e.max and Vita Mark II ceramics is 20 s etch using 5 % hydrofluoric acid.

摘要

引言

牙科陶瓷被视为高度美观的修复材料,比其他材料能更好地模拟天然牙列的外观。本研究的目的是评估氢氟酸浓度和蚀刻时间对双固化树脂水门汀(Panavia F2.0)与IPS e.max CAD和Vita Mark II之间微剪切粘结强度(μSBS)的影响。

方法

本研究为体外实验研究,于2016年在巴博尔医科大学牙科材料研究中心进行。分别使用两种氢氟酸浓度(5%和10%)和三种不同的蚀刻时间(20、60和120秒)对样本进行蚀刻。根据制造商的使用说明,在蚀刻后的表面使用硅烷偶联剂(Clearfil瓷用活化剂)以及底漆和粘结剂(Clearfil SE粘结剂)。然后将树脂水门汀涂覆在制备好的陶瓷表面并进行光固化。使用万能试验机测量树脂水门汀与陶瓷之间的μSBS。通过体视显微镜以40倍放大倍数观察失效模式。数据采用方差分析、独立样本t检验和卡方检验进行分析。

结果

在e.max和Vita Mark II两组中,当使用不同的蚀刻时间(单因素方差分析)和氢氟酸浓度(独立样本t检验)时,μSBS无显著差异(p>0.05),但最高的μSBS出现在用5%氢氟酸蚀刻60秒的e.max样本以及用10%氢氟酸蚀刻20秒的Vita Mark II样本中。e.max的μSBS显著高于Vita Mark II(p = 0.00)。

结论

对于e.max和Vita Mark II陶瓷,最佳的表面处理方法是使用5%氢氟酸蚀刻20秒。

相似文献

1
Effect of hydrofluoric acid surface treatments on micro-shear bond strength of CAD/CAM ceramics.
Electron Physician. 2017 Oct 25;9(10):5487-5493. doi: 10.19082/5487. eCollection 2017 Oct.
3
Bonding Effectiveness of Luting Composites to Different CAD/CAM Materials.
J Adhes Dent. 2016;18(4):289-302. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a36155.
4
Influence of surface treatments and adhesive protocols on repair bond strength of glass-matrix and resin-matrix CAD/CAM ceramics.
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023 Dec;35(8):1322-1331. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13131. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
5
Does a Self-etching Ceramic Primer Improve Bonding to Lithium Disilicate Ceramics? Bond Strengths and FESEM Analyses.
Oper Dent. 2019 Mar/Apr;44(2):210-218. doi: 10.2341/17-355-L. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
7
Micro-shear bond strength of dual-cured resin cement to glass ceramics.
Dent Mater. 2002 Jul;18(5):380-8. doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(01)00054-9.
10
Bonding effectiveness of tooth-colored materials to resin cement provided by self-etching silane primer after short- and long-term storage.
J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Apr;121(4):713.e1-713.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.12.018. Epub 2019 Mar 11.

引用本文的文献

5
Tensile Bond Strength and Retention of Three Types of Ceramic Endocrowns.
J Dent (Shiraz). 2023 Mar;24(1):34-40. doi: 10.30476/DENTJODS.2022.92053.1619.
7
In Vitro Effect of Acidic Solutions and Sodium Fluoride on Surface Roughness of Two Types of CAD-CAM Dental Ceramics.
Int J Dent. 2021 Jul 23;2021:9977993. doi: 10.1155/2021/9977993. eCollection 2021.
8
Effect of Die Spacer Thickness on the Microshear Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicate Veneers.
Int J Dent. 2021 Jul 23;2021:4593131. doi: 10.1155/2021/4593131. eCollection 2021.
9

本文引用的文献

1
Fracture toughness of chairside CAD/CAM materials - Alternative loading approach for compact tension test.
Dent Mater. 2016 Jul;32(7):847-52. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.03.003. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
3
Effect of etching time and resin bond on the flexural strength of IPS e.max Press glass ceramic.
Dent Mater. 2014 Dec;30(12):e330-6. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.08.373. Epub 2014 Sep 1.
4
Ceramic dental biomaterials and CAD/CAM technology: state of the art.
J Prosthodont Res. 2014 Oct;58(4):208-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2014.07.003. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
5
Current status of zirconia restoration.
J Prosthodont Res. 2013 Oct;57(4):236-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2013.09.001. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
7
A clinical evaluation of chairside lithium disilicate CAD/CAM crowns: a two-year report.
J Am Dent Assoc. 2010 Jun;141 Suppl 2:10S-4S. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0355.
8
Panorama of dental CAD/CAM restorative systems.
Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2008 Oct;29(8):482, 484, 486-8 passim.
9
The effect of hydrofluoric acid surface treatment and bond strength of a zirconia veneering ceramic.
J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Sep;100(3):194-202. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60178-X.
10
Effect of surface acid etching on the biaxial flexural strength of two hot-pressed glass ceramics.
J Prosthodont. 2008 Jul;17(5):415-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00319.x. Epub 2008 May 9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验