Farag Sherine Mohamed, Ghoneim Mona Mohamed, Afifi Rania Reda
Conservative Dentistry Department, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Int J Dent. 2021 Jul 23;2021:4593131. doi: 10.1155/2021/4593131. eCollection 2021.
The aim of this study was to compare the microshear bond strength of ceramic veneers with digital die spacer settings at 20, 40, and 100 m.
Eighteen milled lithium disilicate microdiscs (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent) were divided into three groups ( = 6) according to their digital die spacer settings: group A = 20 m, group B = 40 m, and group C = 100 m. Six randomly selected sound maxillary premolars received three microdiscs each. Each microdisc was 1 mm in diameter and 1 mm in height. The buccal surfaces of the premolars were prepared with a 0.5 mm depth in enamel. After cementation, the specimens were thermocycled for 2,500 cycles between 5 and 55°C. Microshear bond strength testing was performed using a universal testing machine until bonding failure. Failure modes were evaluated using a stereomicroscope. Statistical analyses included one-way ANOVA, Tukey's post hoc test, and chi-square test with a 5% alpha error and 80% study power.
The mean microshear bond strength values were calculated in MPa for group A = 31.91 ± 12.41, group B = 29.58 ± 5.03, and group C = 13.85 ± 4.12. One-way ANOVA ( ≤ 0.05) showed a statistically significant difference in microshear bond strength among the three groups. Tukey's post hoc test showed significant differences between groups A and C (=0.004) and between groups B and C (=0.011). The failure modes were presented as cohesive, adhesive, and mixed failures. Chi-square test indicated that the failure mode distribution was not significantly different among the three groups (=0.970).
Higher digital die spacer settings decrease the microshear bond strength of CAD/CAM lithium disilicate veneers.
本研究旨在比较数字代型间隙设置为20、40和100μm时陶瓷贴面的微剪切粘结强度。
将18个铣削而成的二硅酸锂微型圆盘(IPS e.max CAD,义获嘉伟瓦登特公司)根据其数字代型间隙设置分为三组(每组n = 6):A组 = 20μm,B组 = 40μm,C组 = 100μm。随机选取6颗完好的上颌前磨牙,每颗牙粘结3个微型圆盘。每个微型圆盘直径为1mm,高度为1mm。在上颌前磨牙的颊面制备0.5mm深的釉质。粘结后,将试件在5至55°C之间进行2500次热循环。使用万能试验机进行微剪切粘结强度测试,直至粘结失败。使用体视显微镜评估失败模式。统计分析包括单因素方差分析、Tukey事后检验和卡方检验,α错误率为5%,检验效能为80%。
A组的平均微剪切粘结强度值以MPa计算为31.91±12.41,B组为29.58±5.03,C组为13.85±4.12。单因素方差分析(P≤0.05)显示三组之间的微剪切粘结强度存在统计学显著差异。Tukey事后检验显示A组和C组之间(P = 0.004)以及B组和C组之间(P = 0.011)存在显著差异。失败模式表现为内聚性、粘结性和混合性失败。卡方检验表明三组之间的失败模式分布无显著差异(P = 0.970)。
较高的数字代型间隙设置会降低CAD/CAM二硅酸锂贴面的微剪切粘结强度。