Husna A U, Azam A, Qadeer S, Awan M A, Nasreen S, Shahzad Q, Fouladi-Nashta A, Khalid M, Akhter S
Department of Zoology, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Sargodha-Mianwali Campus-Mianwali, Mianwali, Pakistan.
Reprod Domest Anim. 2018 Apr;53(2):377-384. doi: 10.1111/rda.13117. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
Routinely, swim-up method is used to separate high-quality sperm; however, long processing time and close cell-to-cell contact during the centrifugation step are inevitable elements of oxidative stress to sperm. The objective was to evaluate Sephadex and glass wool filtration to separate motile, intact and viable sperm for in vitro fertilization in buffalo. The cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) were collected from ovaries of slaughtered buffaloes by aspiration and matured for 24 hr in CO incubator at 38.5°C and 5% CO . Matured COCs were rinsed twice in fertilization TALP and placed in the pre-warmed fertilization medium without sperm. Cryopreserved buffalo semen was thawed at 37°C for 30 s and processed through Sephadex , glass wool filtration and swim-up (control). Total and motile sperm recovery rates were assessed, resuspended in fertilization TALP and incubated for 15-20 min in CO incubator. Samples prepared by each method were divided into two aliquots: one aliquot was studied for sperm quality (progressive motility, membrane integrity, viability, liveability), while the other was subjected to co-incubation with sets of 10-15 in vitro matured oocytes. Data on sperm quality were analysed by ANOVA, while in vitro fertilizing rates were compared by chi-squared test using SPSS-20. Least significant difference (LSD) test was used to compare treatment means. Glass wool filtration yielded higher total and motile sperm recovery rate, while Sephadex filtration improved (p < .05) sperm quality (progressive motility, membrane integrity, viability, liveability). Sperm preparation through Sephadex filtration yielded higher in vitro fertilization rate in terms of cleavage rate compared to glass wool filtration and swim-up (control). In conclusion, cryopreserved Nili-Ravi buffalo sperm selected through Sephadex filtration showed improved quality and yielded better fertilization rates (cleavage rate) of in vitro matured/fertilized oocytes. Sephadex filtration could be a promising technique for use in in vitro fertilization in buffalo.
通常,上浮法用于分离高质量精子;然而,离心步骤中处理时间长以及细胞间紧密接触是精子氧化应激不可避免的因素。目的是评估葡聚糖凝胶和玻璃棉过滤法,以分离用于水牛体外受精的活动、完整且有活力的精子。通过抽吸从屠宰水牛的卵巢中收集卵丘 - 卵母细胞复合体(COCs),并在38.5°C和5%二氧化碳的二氧化碳培养箱中成熟24小时。成熟的COCs在受精TALP中冲洗两次,然后置于预热的无精子受精培养基中。冷冻保存的水牛精液在37°C解冻30秒,并通过葡聚糖凝胶、玻璃棉过滤和上浮法(对照)进行处理。评估总精子回收率和活动精子回收率,将其重悬于受精TALP中,并在二氧化碳培养箱中孵育15 - 20分钟。每种方法制备的样品分为两份:一份用于研究精子质量(渐进性运动能力、膜完整性、活力、存活率),另一份与10 - 15个体外成熟的卵母细胞进行共孵育。精子质量数据通过方差分析进行分析,而体外受精率使用SPSS - 20通过卡方检验进行比较。使用最小显著差异(LSD)检验比较处理均值。玻璃棉过滤产生更高的总精子回收率和活动精子回收率,而葡聚糖凝胶过滤改善了(p < 0.05)精子质量(渐进性运动能力、膜完整性、活力、存活率)。与玻璃棉过滤和上浮法(对照)相比,通过葡聚糖凝胶过滤制备的精子在卵裂率方面产生更高的体外受精率。总之,通过葡聚糖凝胶过滤选择的冷冻保存的尼里 - 拉维水牛精子显示出质量提高,并产生更好的体外成熟/受精卵母细胞的受精率(卵裂率)。葡聚糖凝胶过滤可能是一种有前途的用于水牛体外受精的技术。