Suppr超能文献

美国神经重症医师培训现状:与其他重症监护培训项目的比较。

The Present State of Neurointensivist Training in the United States: A Comparison to Other Critical Care Training Programs.

机构信息

Division of Neurocritical Care and Emergency Neurology, Departments of Emergency Medicine and Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.

Department of Critical Care Services, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2018 Feb;46(2):307-315. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002876.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This manuscript describes the state of neurocritical care fellowship training, compares its written standards to those of other critical care fellowship programs, and discusses how programmatic oversight by the United Council for Neurological Subspecialties should evolve to meet American College of Graduate Medical Education standards. This review is a work product of the Society of Critical Care Medicine Neuroscience section and was reviewed and approved by the Council of the Society of Critical Care Medicine.

DATA SOURCES

We evaluated the published training criteria and requirements of American College of Graduate Medical Education Critical Care subspecialty fellowships programs of Internal Medicine, Surgery, and Anesthesia and compared them with the training criteria and required competencies for neurocritical care.

STUDY SELECTION

We have reviewed the published training standards from American College of Graduate Medical Education as well as the United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties subspecialty training documents and clarified the definition and responsibilities of an intensivist with reference to the Leapfrog Group, the National Quality Forum, and the Joint Commission.

DATA EXTRACTION

No data at present exist to test the concept of similarity across specialty fellowship critical care training programs.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Neurocritical care training differs in its exposure to clinical entities that are directly associated to other critical care subspecialties. However, the core critical care knowledge, procedural skills, and competencies standards for neurocritical care appears to be similar with some important differences compared with American College of Graduate Medical Education critical care training programs.

CONCLUSIONS

The United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties has developed a directed program development strategy to emulate American College of Graduate Medical Education standards with the goal to have standards that are similar or identical to American College of Graduate Medical Education standards.

摘要

目的

本文描述了神经危重症监护培训的现状,将其书面标准与其他重症监护培训计划进行了比较,并讨论了美国神经科医师协会理事会应如何发展以满足美国研究生医学教育标准。本综述是重症监护医学神经科学分会的工作成果,经重症监护医学学会理事会审查和批准。

资料来源

我们评估了美国研究生医学教育内科、外科和麻醉Critical Care 亚专科培训计划的已发表培训标准和要求,并将其与神经危重症监护的培训标准和所需能力进行了比较。

研究选择

我们已经审查了美国研究生医学教育协会以及美国神经科医师协会理事会的专科培训文件,并参考了 Leapfrog Group、国家质量论坛和联合委员会,明确了强化治疗医师的定义和职责。

数据提取

目前尚无数据可用于测试各专业重症监护培训计划之间相似性的概念。

数据综合

神经危重症培训在与其他重症监护亚专科直接相关的临床实体方面存在差异。然而,神经危重症的核心重症监护知识、程序技能和能力标准似乎与美国研究生医学教育重症监护培训计划相似,但也存在一些重要差异。

结论

美国神经科医师协会理事会制定了一项定向计划发展战略,以效仿美国研究生医学教育标准,目标是使标准与美国研究生医学教育标准相似或相同。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验