Chiu William C, Scalea Thomas M, Rotondo Michael F
R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201-1595, USA.
J Trauma. 2005 Mar;58(3):605-13. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000152563.84345.0e.
Almost 10 years ago, the Careers in Trauma Committee of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) identified four main problems with trauma fellowships: (1) lack of specified educational objectives, (2) undefined curricula, (3) inconsistent emphasis on research, and (4) inconsistent surgical exposure. These perceived problems still exist and may threaten the future of trauma surgery as a career. The objective of this study was to examine these issues in a profile of the current active clinical trauma care fellowship training programs.
The database foundation was the Trauma Fellowships Listing at the EAST Web site (http://www.east.org). All active clinical trauma training programs on this list were identified, and descriptive information was updated and abstracted. A supplemental survey was sent to each program contact person with specific questions regarding program organization, educational material, fellow responsibilities, and scholarly opportunities. In 2003, the entire database was updated, and the survey process was repeated.
The number of active trauma care fellowship programs was 39 (1996), 43 (1999), and 50 (2003). From 1996 to 2003, 15 new programs came into existence, and 4 programs became inactive. Current programs are located in 23 states, Washington DC, Canada, and Australia. California has seven; Pennsylvania has four; and three states have three programs each. The annual trauma admissions for most programs (42 of 50, 84%) vary between 750 and 4,000, with six programs admitting more than 4,000. The most common program format (20 of 50, 40%) offers combined trauma and critical care training, whereas only three programs (6%) offer a choice of trauma only, critical care only, or combined trauma and critical care. A Residency Review Committee (RRC)-approved surgical critical care program was an integral component in 54% (1996), 76% (1999), and 78% (2003). The majority of programs (39 of 50, 78%) are of 1-year duration, with some (22 of 50, 44%) having an optional second year. Most programs (40 of 50, 80%) have one or two positions per year, with the largest program having eight fellows per year. The total number of positions available per year was 66 (1996), 89 (1999), and 95 (2003). Most fellows lead and direct a team of residents and medical students. More programs reported that fellows direct the initial resuscitation of all trauma patients admitted, and more programs are requiring in-house call requirements for fellows.
There is steady growth in trauma fellowship training, with an emphasis on direct clinical management. An RRC-approved surgical critical care program is an important link, but one not essential to the trauma fellowship. Expected radical changes in surgical and trauma training are on the horizon. It is imperative that leaders in trauma surgery continue to monitor these trends for successful integration of trauma care training into surgical residency redesign efforts, and for facilitation of programmatic improvement in trauma care as a career.
大约10年前,东部创伤外科学会(EAST)的创伤职业委员会确定了创伤专科培训存在的四个主要问题:(1)缺乏明确的教育目标;(2)课程未明确界定;(3)对研究的重视程度不一致;(4)手术接触机会不一致。这些问题依然存在,可能会威胁到创伤外科作为一种职业的未来发展。本研究的目的是在当前活跃的临床创伤护理专科培训项目概况中审视这些问题。
活跃的创伤护理专科培训项目数量在1996年为39个,1999年为43个,2003年为50个。从1996年到2003年,有15个新项目出现,4个项目不再活跃。目前的项目分布在23个州、华盛顿特区、加拿大和澳大利亚。加利福尼亚州有7个;宾夕法尼亚州有4个;有三个州各有3个项目。大多数项目(50个中的42个,84%)每年的创伤入院病例数在750至4000例之间,有6个项目的入院病例数超过4000例。最常见的项目形式(50个中的20个,40%)提供创伤与重症护理联合培训,而只有3个项目(6%)提供仅创伤、仅重症护理或创伤与重症护理联合的选择。住院医师评审委员会(RRC)批准的外科重症护理项目在1996年占54%,1999年占76%,2003年占78%,是一个不可或缺的组成部分。大多数项目(50个中的39个,78%)为期1年,有些项目(50个中的22个,44%)有可选的第二年。大多数项目(50个中的40个,80%)每年有一两个职位,最大的项目每年有8名学员。每年可提供的职位总数在1996年为66个,1999年为89个,2003年为95个。大多数学员领导并指导一组住院医师和医学生。更多项目报告称,学员指导所有入院创伤患者的初始复苏,并且更多项目要求学员承担院内值班任务。
创伤专科培训稳步增长,重点是直接临床管理。RRC批准的外科重症护理项目是一个重要环节,但并非创伤专科培训必不可少的。外科和创伤培训即将发生重大变革。创伤外科的领导者必须持续监测这些趋势,以便将创伤护理培训成功整合到外科住院医师培训重新设计工作中,并促进创伤护理作为一种职业的项目改进。