• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以照护管理减少初级保健的差异和控制高血压:成本效益分析。

Care Management to Reduce Disparities and Control Hypertension in Primary Care: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

Med Care. 2018 Feb;56(2):179-185. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000852.

DOI:10.1097/MLR.0000000000000852
PMID:29239999
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Project ReD CHiP (reducing disparities and controlling hypertension in primary care) care management was a clinic-based intervention that aimed to improve blood pressure control through improved care coordination and provide self-management support to patients from racially and socioeconomically.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ReD CHiP care management versus standard care to treat hypertension in diverse communities.

RESEARCH DESIGN

Microsimulation model from a health care sector perspective over 15 years. We used the published literature to inform our model including the ReD CHiP trial and the age-specific and race-specific cardiovascular disease risk equations. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the uncertainty.

SUBJECTS

Primary prevention in a racially diverse setting.

MEASURES

Costs per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) to produce an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).

RESULTS

ReD CHiP had an increase of $2114 and 0.04 QALYs. The ICER was $52,850/QALY. Predominately African American (ICER: $48,250/QALY) and elderly populations (ie, age 65+) derived value from ReD CHiP (ICER: $39,525/QALY). The value of ReD CHiP varied with changes in the reduction in systolic blood pressure (5 mm Hg reduction, ICER: $133,300/QALY; 15 mm Hg reduction, ICER: $18,767/QALY). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that ReD CHiP CM was cost-effective in over 90% of simulations, based on a willingness-to-pay of $100,000/QALY.

CONCLUSIONS

ReD CHiP care management is cost-effective to prevent negative consequences of hypertension. African American and elderly patients have more favorable ICERs, recommending targeted interventions to improve health equity among vulnerable patient populations.

摘要

背景

项目 ReD CHiP(减少初级保健中的差异和控制高血压)的护理管理是一种基于诊所的干预措施,旨在通过改善护理协调来提高血压控制水平,并为来自不同种族和社会经济背景的患者提供自我管理支持。

目的

评估 ReD CHiP 护理管理与标准护理在不同社区治疗高血压的成本效益。

研究设计

从医疗保健部门的角度来看,这是一个为期 15 年的微观模拟模型。我们使用已发表的文献来为我们的模型提供信息,包括 ReD CHiP 试验以及年龄特异性和种族特异性心血管疾病风险方程。进行了确定性和概率敏感性分析,以评估不确定性。

研究对象

在种族多样化的环境中进行初级预防。

测量

每增加一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的成本,以产生增量成本效益比(ICER)。

结果

ReD CHiP 的增加了$2114 和 0.04 QALY。ICER 为$52850/QALY。主要是非洲裔美国人(ICER:$48250/QALY)和老年人(即年龄 65 岁以上)从 ReD CHiP 中获得了价值(ICER:$39525/QALY)。ReD CHiP 的价值随收缩压降低的变化而变化(5mmHg 降低,ICER:$133300/QALY;15mmHg 降低,ICER:$18767/QALY)。概率敏感性分析表明,基于 100000 美元/QALY 的支付意愿,ReD CHiP CM 在超过 90%的模拟中具有成本效益。

结论

ReD CHiP 护理管理可有效预防高血压的不良后果。非洲裔美国人和老年人的 ICER 更有利,建议针对弱势患者群体进行有针对性的干预,以改善健康公平。

相似文献

1
Care Management to Reduce Disparities and Control Hypertension in Primary Care: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis.以照护管理减少初级保健的差异和控制高血压:成本效益分析。
Med Care. 2018 Feb;56(2):179-185. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000852.
2
Cost-effectiveness of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control Among Older Patients With Hypertension.老年高血压患者强化降压与标准降压的成本效果比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Feb 1;6(2):e230708. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.0708.
3
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness results from the randomised controlled Trial of Oral Mandibular Advancement Devices for Obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea (TOMADO) and long-term economic analysis of oral devices and continuous positive airway pressure.阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征口腔下颌前移装置随机对照试验(TOMADO)的临床疗效和成本效益结果以及口腔装置与持续气道正压通气的长期经济分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Oct;18(67):1-296. doi: 10.3310/hta18670.
4
Cost-Utility Analysis of the Integrated Care Models for the Management of Hypertension Patients: A Quasi-Experiment in Southwest Rural China.中国西南农村地区高血压患者管理的综合护理模式的成本效用分析:一项准实验研究。
Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 13;9:727829. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.727829. eCollection 2021.
5
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cardiac resynchronisation (biventricular pacing) for heart failure: systematic review and economic model.心脏再同步治疗(双心室起搏)用于心力衰竭的临床疗效及成本效益:系统评价与经济学模型
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(47):iii-iv, ix-248. doi: 10.3310/hta11470.
6
Cost-effectiveness of screening and optimal management for diabetes, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease: a modeled analysis.糖尿病、高血压和慢性肾脏病的筛查和优化管理的成本效益:建模分析。
Value Health. 2010 Mar-Apr;13(2):196-208. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00668.x. Epub 2009 Oct 29.
7
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.卡莫司汀植入剂与替莫唑胺治疗新诊断的高级别胶质瘤的有效性和成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. doi: 10.3310/hta11450.
8
Cost-Effectiveness of Coronary and Peripheral Artery Disease Antithrombotic Treatments in Finland.芬兰的冠心病和外周动脉疾病抗栓治疗的成本效益分析。
Adv Ther. 2020 Jul;37(7):3348-3369. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01398-8. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
9
Topotecan, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride and paclitaxel for second-line or subsequent treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.拓扑替康、聚乙二醇化脂质体盐酸多柔比星和紫杉醇用于晚期卵巢癌二线或后续治疗:一项系统评价和经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(9):1-132. iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10090.
10
Cost-Effectiveness of KTE-X19 for Adults with Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in the United States.KTE-X19 治疗美国成人复发/难治性 B 细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病的成本效果分析。
Adv Ther. 2022 Aug;39(8):3678-3695. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02201-6. Epub 2022 Jun 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Can integrated care interventions strengthen primary care and improve outcomes for patients with chronic diseases? A systematic review and meta-analysis.综合护理干预能否加强初级保健并改善慢性病患者的治疗效果?一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Jan 6;23(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01260-1.
2
Economics of Team-Based Care for Blood Pressure Control: Updated Community Guide Systematic Review.基于团队的护理经济学:血压控制社区指南系统评价更新。
Am J Prev Med. 2023 Oct;65(4):735-754. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.04.013. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
3
High Blood Pressure Medication Adherence Among Urban, African Americans in the Midwest United States.
美国中西部城市中非洲裔美国人的高血压药物治疗依从性。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2021 Jun;8(3):607-617. doi: 10.1007/s40615-020-00819-2. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
4
Progress on Major Public Health Challenges: The Importance of Equity.重大公共卫生挑战的进展:公平的重要性。
Public Health Rep. 2018 Nov/Dec;133(1_suppl):15S-19S. doi: 10.1177/0033354918795164.
5
Capsule Commentary on Murray et al. Antihypertensive Medication and Dementia Risk in Older Adult African-Americans with Hypertension: a Prospective Cohort Study.关于默里等人的胶囊评论。老年非裔美国高血压患者的抗高血压药物治疗与痴呆风险:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Apr;33(4):496. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4340-y.