• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

印度南部口服吗啡的使用情况:一项基于人群的研究。

Oral Morphine Use in South India: A Population-Based Study.

作者信息

Rajagopal M R, Karim Safiya, Booth Christopher M

机构信息

M.R. Rajagopal, Trivandrum Institute of Palliative Sciences and Pallium India, Trivandrum, India; and Safiya Karim and Christopher M. Booth, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Glob Oncol. 2017 Dec;3(6):720-727. doi: 10.1200/JGO.2016.007872. Epub 2017 Feb 8.

DOI:10.1200/JGO.2016.007872
PMID:29244992
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5735973/
Abstract

Purpose Access to opioids for pain control is recognized as an urgent issue in low- and middle-income countries. Here we report temporal and regional trends in morphine use in Kerala, India. Methods Oral morphine use data for the State of Kerala (2012 to 2015) was used to describe temporal trends, regional variation, and provider characteristics. Total morphine use was calculated for each district of Kerala to derive an annual per capita use rate (milligrams per capita). Each provider was classified as government, private, nongovernment organization (NGO), or NGO partnership. Results Oral morphine use for Kerala was 1.32 mg/capita and increased over the study period 27% (from 1.23 mg/capita to 1.56 mg/capita). There was substantial variation in morphine use across districts (range, 0.49 mg/capita to 2.97 mg/capita; six-fold difference). This variation increased over time (19-fold difference in 2015). In 2015, 31% of morphine providers (51 of 167) were government institutions; they delivered 48% of total morphine in Kerala. Corresponding data for other providers are private institutions, 23% of centers and 13% of morphine; NGOs, 41% of centers and 34% of morphine; and NGO partnerships, 5% of centers and 4% of morphine. From 2012 to 2015, the total number of centers increased by 35%, from 124 to 167. Conclusion Oral morphine use has increased over time in Kerala but remains substantially lower than estimated need. There is significant geographic variation of use. Efforts are needed to improve palliative care in Kerala and to reduce regional disparities in access to opioids.

摘要

目的 在低收入和中等收入国家,获取用于疼痛控制的阿片类药物被视为一个紧迫问题。在此,我们报告印度喀拉拉邦吗啡使用的时间和地区趋势。方法 利用喀拉拉邦(2012年至2015年)的口服吗啡使用数据来描述时间趋势、地区差异和提供者特征。计算喀拉拉邦每个区的吗啡总使用量,以得出人均年使用率(毫克/人)。每个提供者被分类为政府、私立、非政府组织(NGO)或NGO合作伙伴关系。结果 喀拉拉邦的口服吗啡使用量为1.32毫克/人,在研究期间增加了27%(从1.23毫克/人增至1.56毫克/人)。各地区的吗啡使用量存在很大差异(范围为0.49毫克/人至2.97毫克/人;相差六倍)。这种差异随时间增加(2015年相差19倍)。2015年,31%的吗啡提供者(167个中的51个)是政府机构;它们提供了喀拉拉邦吗啡总量的48%。其他提供者的相应数据为:私立机构,占中心的23%和吗啡的13%;非政府组织,占中心的41%和吗啡的34%;以及NGO合作伙伴关系,占中心的5%和吗啡的4%。从2012年到2015年,中心总数增加了35%,从124个增至167个。结论 喀拉拉邦的口服吗啡使用量随时间增加,但仍远低于估计需求。使用情况存在显著的地理差异。需要努力改善喀拉拉邦的姑息治疗,并减少获取阿片类药物方面的地区差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4017/5735973/d87ef5aa1b7b/JGO.2016.007872f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4017/5735973/73e4ad00efbd/JGO.2016.007872f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4017/5735973/d87ef5aa1b7b/JGO.2016.007872f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4017/5735973/73e4ad00efbd/JGO.2016.007872f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4017/5735973/d87ef5aa1b7b/JGO.2016.007872f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Oral Morphine Use in South India: A Population-Based Study.印度南部口服吗啡的使用情况:一项基于人群的研究。
J Glob Oncol. 2017 Dec;3(6):720-727. doi: 10.1200/JGO.2016.007872. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
2
An ethnographic study of barriers to cancer pain management and opioid availability in India.一项关于印度癌症疼痛管理障碍及阿片类药物可及性的人种志研究。
Oncologist. 2014 May;19(5):515-22. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0435. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
3
Opioids in middle eastern populations.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2010;11 Suppl 1:1-5.
4
Medical use, misuse, and diversion of opioids in India.印度阿片类药物的医疗使用、滥用及转移用途情况。
Lancet. 2001 Jul 14;358(9276):139-43. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(01)05322-3.
5
Formulary availability and regulatory barriers to accessibility of opioids for cancer pain in Africa: a report from the Global Opioid Policy Initiative (GOPI).非洲癌症疼痛阿片类药物的处方供应情况和获取障碍:全球阿片类药物政策倡议组织(GOPI)的报告。
Ann Oncol. 2013 Dec;24 Suppl 11:xi14-23. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt499.
6
Improving Access and Quality of Palliative Care in Kerala: A Cross-sectional Study of Providers in Routine Practice.改善喀拉拉邦姑息治疗的可及性与质量:一项针对常规实践中提供者的横断面研究
Indian J Palliat Care. 2020 Oct-Dec;26(4):500-505. doi: 10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_17_20. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
7
Formulary availability and regulatory barriers to accessibility of opioids for cancer pain in Latin America and the Caribbean: a report from the Global Opioid Policy Initiative (GOPI).拉丁美洲和加勒比地区癌症疼痛阿片类药物的处方供应和可及性的监管障碍:全球阿片政策倡议(GOPI)的报告。
Ann Oncol. 2013 Dec;24 Suppl 11:xi41-50. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt502.
8
Trends in opioid use over time: 1997 to 1999.
J Palliat Med. 2004 Feb;7(1):39-45. doi: 10.1089/109662104322737232.
9
Opioids for cancer pain: availability, accessibility, and regulatory barriers in Turkey and Pallia-Turk Project.土耳其用于癌症疼痛的阿片类药物:可及性、可获得性及监管障碍与Pallia-Turk项目
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2011 Apr;33 Suppl 1:S29-32. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0b013e3182121bd9.
10
Injectable antibiotic use in India: public-private share in volume and cost.印度注射用抗生素的使用情况:公私部门在用量和成本方面的占比
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Feb 19;9:70. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.20633.1. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Access to opioids for palliative care in humanitarian settings: two case studies of Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) experience in India and Bangladesh.在人道主义环境中获取用于姑息治疗的阿片类药物:无国界医生组织(MSF)在印度和孟加拉国经验的两个案例研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Apr 2;24(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01673-x.
2
Decolonization of pain relief policies in the Global South: a call for action.全球南方疼痛缓解政策的去殖民化:行动呼吁。
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Feb 6;33(3):158. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09217-y.
3
Views and experiences of opioid access amongst palliative care providers and public representatives in a low-resource setting: A qualitative interview study.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of and barriers to access to opioid analgesics: a worldwide, regional, and national study.阿片类镇痛药的使用和获取障碍:一项全球性、区域性和国家性研究。
Lancet. 2016 Apr 16;387(10028):1644-56. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00161-6. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
2
Provision of Palliative Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Overcoming Obstacles for Effective Treatment Delivery.中低收入国家的姑息治疗提供:克服有效治疗实施的障碍。
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jan 1;34(1):62-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.1615. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
3
An ethnographic study of barriers to cancer pain management and opioid availability in India.
资源匮乏地区姑息治疗提供者和公众代表对阿片类药物可及性的观点与经验:一项定性访谈研究
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Sep 21;3(9):e0002401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002401. eCollection 2023.
4
Targeting elimination of cervical cancer by 2030: a baseline assessment in six African countries-part II.到2030年消除宫颈癌目标:六个非洲国家的基线评估——第二部分
Ecancermedicalscience. 2022 Oct 7;16:1454. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2022.1454. eCollection 2022.
5
Are we ready to manage an opioid epidemic in the intensive care unit?我们是否已准备好应对重症监护病房中的阿片类药物流行?
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2022;54(3):271-278. doi: 10.5114/ait.2022.118881.
6
Room for Improvement in Kerala's Palliative Care Delivery.喀拉拉邦姑息治疗服务的改进空间。
Indian J Palliat Care. 2021 Jul-Sep;27(3):452. doi: 10.25259/IJPC_42_21. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
7
Improving Access and Quality of Palliative Care in Kerala: A Cross-sectional Study of Providers in Routine Practice.改善喀拉拉邦姑息治疗的可及性与质量:一项针对常规实践中提供者的横断面研究
Indian J Palliat Care. 2020 Oct-Dec;26(4):500-505. doi: 10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_17_20. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
8
Geographical and socioeconomic disparities in opioid access in Mexico, 2015-19: a retrospective analysis of surveillance data.墨西哥阿片类药物获取的地理和社会经济差异,2015-19 年:监测数据的回顾性分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2021 Feb;6(2):e88-e96. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30260-7.
9
Palliative care needs among patients with advanced illnesses in Bhutan.不丹晚期疾病患者的姑息治疗需求。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Jan 9;20(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00697-9.
10
Palliative Care Program Development in a Low- to Middle-Income Country: Delivery of Care by a Nongovernmental Organization in India.低收入和中等收入国家的姑息治疗项目发展:印度一家非政府组织提供的护理服务
J Glob Oncol. 2018 Sep;4:1-8. doi: 10.1200/JGO.17.00168.
一项关于印度癌症疼痛管理障碍及阿片类药物可及性的人种志研究。
Oncologist. 2014 May;19(5):515-22. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0435. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
4
Cancer research in India: national priorities, global results.印度癌症研究:国家重点,全球成果。
Lancet Oncol. 2014 May;15(6):e213-22. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70109-3. Epub 2014 Apr 11.
5
The growing burden of cancer in India: epidemiology and social context.印度癌症负担日益加重:流行病学和社会背景。
Lancet Oncol. 2014 May;15(6):e205-12. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70115-9. Epub 2014 Apr 11.
6
The Global Opioid Policy Initiative (GOPI) project to evaluate the availability and accessibility of opioids for the management of cancer pain in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean, and the Middle East: introduction and methodology.全球阿片类药物政策倡议(GOPI)项目评估非洲、亚洲、拉丁美洲和加勒比以及中东地区管理癌症疼痛的阿片类药物的可及性和可及性:介绍和方法。
Ann Oncol. 2013 Dec;24 Suppl 11:xi7-13. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt498.
7
Next steps in access and availability of opioids for the treatment of cancer pain: reaching the tipping point?癌症疼痛治疗中阿片类药物的可及性和可获得性的下一步:达到临界点了吗?
Ann Oncol. 2013 Dec;24 Suppl 11:xi60-4. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt504.
8
Formulary availability and regulatory barriers to accessibility of opioids for cancer pain in India: a report from the Global Opioid Policy Initiative (GOPI).在印度,癌症疼痛阿片类药物的处方供应情况和可及性的监管障碍:全球阿片类药物政策倡议(GOPI)的报告。
Ann Oncol. 2013 Dec;24 Suppl 11:xi33-40. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt501.
9
Adequacy of opioid analgesic consumption at country, global, and regional levels in 2010, its relationship with development level, and changes compared with 2006.2010年各国、全球及区域层面阿片类镇痛药的消费充足情况、其与发展水平的关系以及与2006年相比的变化。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Feb;47(2):283-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.03.015. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
10
Cancer survival in Africa, Asia, and Central America: a population-based study.癌症在非洲、亚洲和中美洲的生存情况:基于人群的研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2010 Feb;11(2):165-73. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70335-3. Epub 2009 Dec 10.