Department of Psychology, Northumbria University, UK.
Department of Marketing, Sunway University, Bandar Sunway, Malaysia.
Nutr Res. 2017 Dec;48:65-75. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2017.10.011. Epub 2017 Oct 14.
Behavioral flexibility (BF) performance is influenced by both psychological and physiological factors. Recent evidence suggests that impulsivity and blood glucose can affect executive function, of which BF is a subdomain. Here, we hypothesized that impulsivity, fasting blood glucose (FBG), glucose changes (ie, glucoregulation) from postprandial blood glucose (PBG) following the intake of a 15-g glucose beverage could account for variability in BF performance. The Stroop Color-Word Test and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) were used as measures of BF, and the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11) to quantify participants' impulsivity. In Study 1, neither impulsivity nor FBG could predict performance on the Stroop or the WCST. In Study 2, we tested whether blood glucose levels following the intake of a sugary drink, and absolute changes in glucose levels following the intake of the glucose beverage could better predict BF. Results showed that impulsivity and the difference in blood glucose between time 1 (postprandial) and time 2, but not blood glucose levels at time 2 per se could account for variation in performance on the WCST but not on the Stroop task. More specifically, lower impulsivity scores on the BIS-11, and smaller differences in blood glucose levels from time 1 to time 2 predicted a decrease in the number of total and perseverative errors on the WCST. Our results show that measures of impulsivity and glucoregulation can be used to predict BF. Importantly our data extend the work on glucose and cognition to a clinically relevant domain of cognition.
行为灵活性(BF)表现受到心理和生理因素的影响。最近的证据表明,冲动和血糖会影响执行功能,BF 是其一个子领域。在这里,我们假设冲动、空腹血糖(FBG)、餐后血糖(PBG)摄入 15 克葡萄糖饮料后的血糖变化(即血糖调节)可以解释 BF 表现的可变性。Stroop 颜色-单词测试和威斯康星卡片分类测试(WCST)被用作 BF 的测量指标,而巴瑞特冲动量表(BIS-11)用于量化参与者的冲动。在研究 1 中,冲动和 FBG 都不能预测 Stroop 或 WCST 的表现。在研究 2 中,我们测试了摄入含糖饮料后血糖水平以及摄入葡萄糖饮料后血糖水平的绝对变化是否可以更好地预测 BF。结果表明,冲动和时间 1(餐后)与时间 2 之间的血糖差异,而不是时间 2 时的血糖水平本身,可以解释 WCST 但不能解释 Stroop 任务的表现差异。更具体地说,BIS-11 上的冲动得分较低,以及时间 1 到时间 2 的血糖水平差异较小,可预测 WCST 上总错误和坚持性错误数量的减少。我们的结果表明,冲动和血糖调节的测量可以用于预测 BF。重要的是,我们的数据将血糖和认知的研究扩展到认知的一个临床相关领域。